Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/512x: add a device tree binding for LocalPlus Bus FIFO

2015-09-29 Thread Alexander Popov
On 28.09.2015 16:26, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Alexander Popov wrote:
>> I've just followed devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt...
>> This "rx-tx" doesn't mean much but it could show that LocalPlus Bus FIFO
>> uses a single DMA read-write channel. Should I really drop it?
> 
> Hmmm, I'm not sure.  Is there anything else (besides your driver) that
> parses this device tree node?

No, mpc512x_lpbfifo.c is the only piece of code which is going to use this
device tree node.

> dma.txt says this:
> 
> "The specific strings that can be used are defined in the binding of the
> DMA client device."
> 
> So this looks like it's driver-specific,

Yes.
MPC512x LocalPlus Bus FIFO uses the channel #26 of the DMA controller
both for reading and writing, and other DMA clients use other specific
DMA channels. This channel assignment is fixed in hardware and described
in the Reference Manual.

> but it is a required property.
> I guess you should keep it, but I think you should get a second opinion.

Ok, thanks.

Best regards,
Alexander
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/512x: add a device tree binding for LocalPlus Bus FIFO

2015-09-28 Thread Alexander Popov
On 25.09.2015 03:18, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Alexander Popov wrote:
>> +- dma-names: should be "rx-tx";
> 
> Why bother, if it can only be one value?

I've just followed devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt...
This "rx-tx" doesn't mean much but it could show that LocalPlus Bus FIFO
uses a single DMA read-write channel. Should I really drop it?

Best regards,
Alexander
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/512x: add a device tree binding for LocalPlus Bus FIFO

2015-09-28 Thread Timur Tabi

Alexander Popov wrote:

I've just followed devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt...
This "rx-tx" doesn't mean much but it could show that LocalPlus Bus FIFO
uses a single DMA read-write channel. Should I really drop it?


Hmmm, I'm not sure.  Is there anything else (besides your driver) that 
parses this device tree node?


dma.txt says this:

	"The specific strings that can be used are defined in the binding of 
the DMA client device."


So this looks like it's driver-specific, but it is a required property.
I guess you should keep it, but I think you should get a second opinion.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/512x: add a device tree binding for LocalPlus Bus FIFO

2015-09-24 Thread Timur Tabi

Alexander Popov wrote:

+- dma-names: should be "rx-tx";


Why bother, if it can only be one value?
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev