Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree

2020-08-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Christoph,

On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:11:06 +0200 Christoph Hellwig  wrote:
>
> please drop my set_fs tree from linux-next.  It is not going to be
> merged for 5.9 in this form.

OK, done from tomorrow.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpWqA2LVLZSU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree

2020-08-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Hi Stephen,

please drop my set_fs tree from linux-next.  It is not going to be
merged for 5.9 in this form.

Thanks!


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the powerpc tree

2020-08-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:09:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell  
wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the set_fs tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   c30f931e891e ("powerpc/numa: remove ability to enable topology updates")
> 
> from the powerpc tree and commit:
> 
>   16a04bde8169 ("proc: switch over direct seq_read method calls to 
> seq_read_iter")
> 
> from the set_fs tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former removed the code updated by the latter, so I
> just did that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as
> far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
> mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the set_fs tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpgoL2PCd_XS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature