Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-30 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote:
 Jan Dittmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Same error, you write above that a newer compiler version should
 not need -m32 or --with-cpu=default32 any more?
 
 ??? Where did I say that?

Your mail from 2007-10-29 4:39 pm (CET)

  Your compiler still needs -m32 to generate 32-bit code (or use
  --with-cpu=default32 to make that the default).

See the 'still' ? I just assumed that it must have been changed
in newer versions.

But to sum up. I've to compile with '--with-cpu=default32' and all
should be fine? Because I have no idea how to pass the -m32 flag
just to the 32-bit code generation. Passing it via CFLAGS obviously
does not work as it also passes it to the 64 bit code generation.

Jan
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-30 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote:
 Jan Dittmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Your mail from 2007-10-29 4:39 pm (CET)

 Your compiler still needs -m32 to generate 32-bit code (or use
 --with-cpu=default32 to make that the default).
 See the 'still' ?
 
 How would the compiler know whether to generate 64bit or 32bit code??

Andreas, I think we both got a bit lost. Lets take a step back.

The original problem was that after 2.6.23 cross compiling
powerpc/g5_defconfig broke (Regression). Using gcc 4.0.4, powerpc64
target as cross compiler and powerpc target as 32-bit cross compiler.

Since 2.6.23-git1 it is now broken. Using gcc 4.1.2 didn't fix this. Neither
with --with-cpu=default32 present nor without. So could you please
explain to me how I'm supposed to cross compile powerpc/g5_defconfig now?
Passing CFLAGS=-m32 didn't help too.

Or is it just a new bug in the kernel make system?

Just for reference up till 2.6.23 I used the following command:
make ARCH=powerpc HOSTCC=gcc-4.0 CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux-  \
CROSS32_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-

Thanks,

Jan
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-30 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote:
 Jan Dittmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Your mail from 2007-10-29 4:39 pm (CET)

 Your compiler still needs -m32 to generate 32-bit code (or use
 --with-cpu=default32 to make that the default).
 See the 'still' ?
 
 How would the compiler know whether to generate 64bit or 32bit code??

... and it works again with .24-rc1-git6. So whatever the problem
was. Consider it resolved.

Jan
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Anton Blanchard

Hi,

Jan is seeing the following fail:

WRAParch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pmac
powerpc-linux-objcopy: vmlinux: File format not recognized

He is using a cross compile toolchain invoked with the following command
line:

# make HOSTCC=gcc-4.0 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- 
CROSS32_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-

It seems like boot/wrap wants to use both 64bit and 32bit tools, however
it only receives the 32bit path:

ifneq ($(CROSS32_COMPILE),)
CROSSWRAP := -C $(CROSS32_COMPILE)
else
ifneq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
CROSSWRAP := -C $(CROSS_COMPILE)
endif
endif

Thoughts? I guess we have to pass in both cross compile targets.

One way to make this go away would be to build binutils as biarch:

# configure --target=powerpc-linux --enable-targets=powerpc64-linux ...

Anton
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Andreas Schwab
Anton Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 One way to make this go away would be to build binutils as biarch:

 # configure --target=powerpc-linux --enable-targets=powerpc64-linux ...

If you configure your toolchain for powerpc64-linux you get a biarch
toolchain by default.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
And now for something completely different.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Anton Blanchard
 
Hi,

 If you configure your toolchain for powerpc64-linux you get a biarch
 toolchain by default.

I was wondering about people using pre biarch gcc toolchains. But I take
your point - I'm guessing binutils has been biarch for a long time.
Since we are only calling binutils functions in boot/wrap, maybe we can
just do:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
index 18e3271..8961afd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
@@ -121,13 +121,9 @@ wrapperbits:= $(extra-y) $(addprefix 
$(obj)/,addnote hack-coff mktree) \
 #
 # Bits for building various flavours of zImage
 
-ifneq ($(CROSS32_COMPILE),)
-CROSSWRAP := -C $(CROSS32_COMPILE)
-else
 ifneq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
 CROSSWRAP := -C $(CROSS_COMPILE)
 endif
-endif
 
 # args (to if_changed): 1 = (this rule), 2 = platform, 3 = dts 4=dtb 5=initrd
 quiet_cmd_wrap = WRAP$@
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Andreas Schwab
Jan Dittmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 $ powerpc64-linux-gcc-4.0.4 -v
 Using built-in specs.
 Target: powerpc64-linux
 Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/cc217
 --exec-prefix=/usr/cc217/powerpc64 --target=powerpc64-linux
 --disable-shared --disable-werror --disable-nls --disable-threads
 --disable-werror --disable-libmudflap --with-newlib --with-gnu-as
 --with-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c
 Thread model: single
 gcc version 4.0.4

 g5_defconfig:

 $ make ARCH=powerpc HOSTCC=gcc-4.0 CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- 
 CROSS32_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux-

Your compiler still needs -m32 to generate 32-bit code (or use
--with-cpu=default32 to make that the default).

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
And now for something completely different.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote:
 Jan Dittmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Andreas Schwab wrote:
 Jan Dittmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 $ powerpc64-linux-gcc-4.0.4 -v
 Using built-in specs.
 Target: powerpc64-linux
 Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/cc217
 --exec-prefix=/usr/cc217/powerpc64 --target=powerpc64-linux
 --disable-shared --disable-werror --disable-nls --disable-threads
 --disable-werror --disable-libmudflap --with-newlib --with-gnu-as
 --with-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c
 Thread model: single
 gcc version 4.0.4

 g5_defconfig:

 $ make ARCH=powerpc HOSTCC=gcc-4.0 CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- 
 CROSS32_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux-
 Your compiler still needs -m32 to generate 32-bit code (or use
 --with-cpu=default32 to make that the default).
 4.1.2 exhibits the same behavior.
 
 What do you mean with the same behavior?

Same error, you write above that a newer compiler version should
not need -m32 or --with-cpu=default32 any more? But I still get:

   CC  arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.o
   LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vdso32.lds
   VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/sigtramp.o
   VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.o
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S: 
Assembler messages:
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:33: 
Error: syntax error; found `@' but expected `,'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:33: 
Error: junk at end of line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:37: 
Error: syntax error; found `@' but expected `,'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:37: 
Error: junk at end of line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:95: 
Error: syntax error; found `@' but expected `,'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:95: 
Error: junk at end of line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:103: 
Error: syntax error; found `@' but expected `,'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:103: 
Error: junk at end of line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:130: 
Error: syntax error; found `@' but expected `,'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:130: 
Error: junk at end of line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
make[3]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32] Error 2
make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2

Jan

 
 Andreas.
 

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote:
 Jan Dittmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 $ powerpc64-linux-gcc-4.0.4 -v
 Using built-in specs.
 Target: powerpc64-linux
 Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/cc217
 --exec-prefix=/usr/cc217/powerpc64 --target=powerpc64-linux
 --disable-shared --disable-werror --disable-nls --disable-threads
 --disable-werror --disable-libmudflap --with-newlib --with-gnu-as
 --with-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c
 Thread model: single
 gcc version 4.0.4

 g5_defconfig:

 $ make ARCH=powerpc HOSTCC=gcc-4.0 CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- 
 CROSS32_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux-
 
 Your compiler still needs -m32 to generate 32-bit code (or use
 --with-cpu=default32 to make that the default).

4.1.2 exhibits the same behavior. When did it start to work without
additional options? 4.2?

Jan
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote:
 Anton Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 One way to make this go away would be to build binutils as biarch:

 # configure --target=powerpc-linux --enable-targets=powerpc64-linux ...
 
 If you configure your toolchain for powerpc64-linux you get a biarch
 toolchain by default.

Hmm:

$ powerpc64-linux-ld -V
GNU ld (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.17.50.0.17.20070615
   Supported emulations:
elf64ppc
elf32ppclinux
elf32ppc
elf32ppcsim

$ powerpc64-linux-gcc-4.0.4 -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc64-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/cc217 
--exec-prefix=/usr/cc217/powerpc64 --target=powerpc64-linux --disable-shared 
--disable-werror --disable-nls --disable-threads --disable-werror 
--disable-libmudflap --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld 
--enable-languages=c
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.0.4

g5_defconfig:

$ make ARCH=powerpc HOSTCC=gcc-4.0 CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- 
CROSS32_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux-
...
   CC  arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.o
   LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vdso32.lds
   VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/sigtramp.o
   VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.o
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S: Assembler 
messages:
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:33: Error: 
syntax error; found `@' but expected `,'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:33: Error: 
junk at end of line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:37: Error: 
syntax error; found `@' but expected `,'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:37: Error: 
junk at end of line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:95: Error: 
syntax error; found `@' but expected `,'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:95: Error: 
junk at end of line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:103: Error: 
syntax error; found `@' but expected `,'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:103: Error: 
junk at end of line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:130: Error: 
syntax error; found `@' but expected `,'
/usr/src/xtest/linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:130: Error: 
junk at end of line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
make[3]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32] Error 2
make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2


Jan

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Andreas Schwab
Jan Dittmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Same error, you write above that a newer compiler version should
 not need -m32 or --with-cpu=default32 any more?

??? Where did I say that?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
And now for something completely different.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev