Re: device tree variations

2008-10-21 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt

 Thanks.  The fdt_del_node approach works pretty nicely.  I added a
 dt_ops hook since fdt is static in libfdt-wrapper.c.

 .../...

David says your patch is ok, However it's not in the right form. Could
you repost it please with a proper changeset comment and signed-off-by:
line ?

Thanks !

Cheers,
Ben.


___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: device tree variations

2008-10-20 Thread David Gibson
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 07:14:05PM -0700, Mike Ditto wrote:
 David Gibson wrote:
  Deleting the irrelevant parts or picking a device tree to pass to
  fdt_init() are both reasonable solutions.  libfdt which is included in
  the bootwrapper has functions for removing unwanted nodes: either
  fdt_nop_node() or fdt_del_node() will suffice.  There isn't currently
  a dt_ops hook to call though to those functions though.  You could
  either add one, or (knowing that your platform always has a flat dt)
  bypass the dt_ops hooks and call libfdt directly.
 
 Thanks.  The fdt_del_node approach works pretty nicely.  I added a
 dt_ops hook since fdt is static in libfdt-wrapper.c.
 
 At first I tried fdt_nop_node, fearing that find_node_by_prop_value()
 and fdt_del_node() would interact badly when deleting in
 mid-traversal,

Ah, yes, it would.

 but it turns out that fdt_nop_node() upsets find_node_by_prop_value()
 anyway.

Oh... it shouldn't, I think that's a bug.  I'll try to look into that
and fix it.

  Plus, the kernel prints harmless but strange messages when
 there are NOPs in the tree.

We should probably fix that too.

  So I use fdt_del_node() and rescan from
 the top each time I delete a node and it works fine.

Kind of ugly, but ok.

-- 
David Gibson| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: device tree variations

2008-10-17 Thread Mike Ditto
David Gibson wrote:
 Deleting the irrelevant parts or picking a device tree to pass to
 fdt_init() are both reasonable solutions.  libfdt which is included in
 the bootwrapper has functions for removing unwanted nodes: either
 fdt_nop_node() or fdt_del_node() will suffice.  There isn't currently
 a dt_ops hook to call though to those functions though.  You could
 either add one, or (knowing that your platform always has a flat dt)
 bypass the dt_ops hooks and call libfdt directly.

Thanks.  The fdt_del_node approach works pretty nicely.  I added a
dt_ops hook since fdt is static in libfdt-wrapper.c.

At first I tried fdt_nop_node, fearing that find_node_by_prop_value()
and fdt_del_node() would interact badly when deleting in mid-traversal,
but it turns out that fdt_nop_node() upsets find_node_by_prop_value()
anyway.  Plus, the kernel prints harmless but strange messages when
there are NOPs in the tree.  So I use fdt_del_node() and rescan from
the top each time I delete a node and it works fine.

/* Find all product-dependent nodes and delete inapplicable ones. */
dev = NULL;
while ((dev = find_node_by_prop_value(dev,
  product-dependent,
  , 0)) != NULL) {
u32 mask;
int len;

len = getprop(dev, productmask, mask, sizeof mask);
if (len == sizeof mask) {
if ((mask  (1  product_id)) == 0) {
del_node(dev);
/* Have to restart from the beginning. */
dev = NULL;
}
}
}

I had to fix the memcmp bug I mentioned in an earlier posting to allow
searching for a boolean (empty) property.

If anyone cares, below is a trivial patch to expose the del_node()
operation via dt_ops.

Thanks again,
-=] Mike [=-


Index: arch/powerpc/boot/ops.h
===
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -r1.1.1.1 ops.h
--- arch/powerpc/boot/ops.h 11 Oct 2008 02:51:35 -  1.1.1.1
+++ arch/powerpc/boot/ops.h 18 Oct 2008 02:06:45 -
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
const int buflen);
int (*setprop)(const void *phandle, const char *name,
const void *buf, const int buflen);
+   int (*del_node)(const void *phandle);
void *(*get_parent)(const void *phandle);
/* The node must not already exist. */
void *(*create_node)(const void *parent, const char *name);
@@ -124,6 +125,11 @@
return dt_ops.setprop(devp, name, buf, strlen(buf) + 1);

return -1;
+}
+
+static inline int del_node(const void *devp)
+{
+   return dt_ops.del_node ? dt_ops.del_node(devp) : -1;
 }

 static inline void *get_parent(const char *devp)
Index: arch/powerpc/boot/libfdt-wrapper.c
===
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -r1.1.1.1 libfdt-wrapper.c
--- arch/powerpc/boot/libfdt-wrapper.c  11 Oct 2008 02:51:35 -  1.1.1.1
+++ arch/powerpc/boot/libfdt-wrapper.c  17 Oct 2008 22:08:44 -
@@ -105,6 +105,11 @@
return check_err(rc);
 }

+static int fdt_wrapper_del_node(const void *devp)
+{
+   return fdt_del_node(fdt, devp_offset(devp));
+}
+
 static void *fdt_wrapper_get_parent(const void *devp)
 {
return offset_devp(fdt_parent_offset(fdt, devp_offset(devp)));
@@ -173,6 +178,7 @@
dt_ops.create_node = fdt_wrapper_create_node;
dt_ops.find_node_by_prop_value = fdt_wrapper_find_node_by_prop_value;
dt_ops.find_node_by_compatible = fdt_wrapper_find_node_by_compatible;
+   dt_ops.del_node = fdt_wrapper_del_node;
dt_ops.get_path = fdt_wrapper_get_path;
dt_ops.finalize = fdt_wrapper_finalize;

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev