sfx.c driver build failure

2008-07-25 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Hi Michael !

The sfx driver (which happens to be part of some of our test configs)
fails to build in current Linus tree on powerpc with this error:

/home/benh/kernels/linux-powerpc/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c: In function 
‘efx_probe_interrupts’:
/home/benh/kernels/linux-powerpc/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c:845: error: lvalue 
required as unary ‘’ oper
and

Cheers,
Ben.


___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: sfx.c driver build failure

2008-07-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:15:59 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 The sfx driver (which happens to be part of some of our test configs)
 fails to build in current Linus tree on powerpc with this error:
 
 /home/benh/kernels/linux-powerpc/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c: In function 
 ‘efx_probe_interrupts’:
 /home/benh/kernels/linux-powerpc/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c:845: error: lvalue 
 required as unary ‘’ operand

Commit 695a6b456307455a10059512208e8ed0d376ecd3 topology: work around
topology_core_siblings() breakage in linux-next (from the cpus4096 tree)
comments out the offending lines ...  With the comment the topology API
is a mess right now.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/


pgpmfbW5J1PAU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: sfx.c driver build failure

2008-07-25 Thread Ingo Molnar

* Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:15:59 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  The sfx driver (which happens to be part of some of our test configs)
  fails to build in current Linus tree on powerpc with this error:
  
  /home/benh/kernels/linux-powerpc/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c: In function 
  ‘efx_probe_interrupts’:
  /home/benh/kernels/linux-powerpc/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c:845: error: lvalue 
  required as unary ‘’ operand
 
 Commit 695a6b456307455a10059512208e8ed0d376ecd3 topology: work around 
 topology_core_siblings() breakage in linux-next (from the cpus4096 
 tree) comments out the offending lines ...  With the comment the 
 topology API is a mess right now.

there's a patch from Mike Travis that solves it all from grounds up and 
which approach has the ack of Rusty as well, but it's not fully tested 
through yet - i will get to it later today.

Ingo
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: sfx.c driver build failure

2008-07-25 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 08:35 +0100, Michael Brown wrote:
 On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
  The sfx driver (which happens to be part of some of our test configs) 
  fails to build in current Linus tree on powerpc with this error:
  
  /home/benh/kernels/linux-powerpc/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c: In function 
  ÿÿefx_probe_interruptsÿÿ:
  /home/benh/kernels/linux-powerpc/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c:845: error: lvalue 
  required as unary  oper
  and
 
 I'm not the maintainer of that code; I wrote the original version, but 
 it's now maintained by Solarflare.
 
 I don't see anything on that line that ought to be architecture-specific.  
 Could you send me the preprocessed efx.c from your powerpc build?

Apparently, it's a know generic breakage of the topology stuff,
it's beeing sorted out.

Cheers,
Ben.


___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: sfx.c driver build failure

2008-07-25 Thread Michael Brown
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
 The sfx driver (which happens to be part of some of our test configs) 
 fails to build in current Linus tree on powerpc with this error:
 
 /home/benh/kernels/linux-powerpc/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c: In function 
 ÿÿefx_probe_interruptsÿÿ:
 /home/benh/kernels/linux-powerpc/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c:845: error: lvalue 
 required as unary  oper
 and

I'm not the maintainer of that code; I wrote the original version, but 
it's now maintained by Solarflare.

I don't see anything on that line that ought to be architecture-specific.  
Could you send me the preprocessed efx.c from your powerpc build?

Michael___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev