RE: RE : Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.

2006-12-01 Thread Ming Liu 

Dear Chris,
Thanks for your telling. I have seen that guidance. But I think that is 
specific for the MontaVista linux. In that guidance, it just says to copy 
the generated directories and files into the kernel tree and then configure 
and make zImage. However it doesn't work for my 2.6.16 kernel. 

Any other idea on how to implement such an EDK-generated BSP in the kernel 
like mine? Thanks for any suggestion.


BR
Ming



From: alayrac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Ming Liu' [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: RE : Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:14:43 +0100

Hi Ming

You will find informations to build linux 2.6 BSP in the file
EDK_8.2\sw\ThirdParty\bsp\linux_2_6_v1_00_a\doc\linux_2_6_v1_00_a.pdf

This file is installed with plateform Studio

Regards

Chris

CRESITT INDUSTRIE
12 Rue de Blois, BP6744
45067 ORLEANS Cedex 2
Tel : 02.38.49.45.59
Fax :02.38.49.45.55
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.cresitt.com


 -Message d'origine-
 De : linuxppc-embedded-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linuxppc-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
 part de Ming Liu
 Envoy茅 : jeudi 30 novembre 2006 17:37
 �� : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc : linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
 Objet : Re: Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.

 Dear Michael,
 Now I update my Xilinx design software from 8.1 to 8.2 and notice
 that
 there is already linux_2_6 support. Then I generated the BSP for
 linux 2.6.
 I found that there are some differences from the older version, 

e.g.

 there
 are some files such as XMakefile, xps_connected.cud, etc. I am
 confused
 with this. So could you please give me a hand on how to use such a
 generated BSP to build my linux 2.6 kernel? I cannot find any
 guidance on
 how to do that. Thanks for your help.

 BR
 Ming


 From: Michael Galassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Michael Galassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Ming Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
 Subject: Re: Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.
 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:38:37 -0800
 
 If you use the latest xilinx ISE/EDK/IP update and let it overlay
 your
 mvl source tree with it's files it shouldn't take you more than a
 few
 hours to patch things up to where you can compile a kernel which
 will
 work on the 3.00b IP.  The PHY support is useless but you can work
 around that easily enough.  I've not tried to get any of that
 working
 with a semi-current kernel so if you're not using mvl's flavor of
 2.6.10
 you may run into other issues.
 
 -michael
 
  Dear Andrei,
  I have some questions about your xilinx Temac driver. If 

possible,

 please
  give me a hand on such confusing problems.
  
  1. I am using the driver from
  http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/, and the 

IP

 cores
 of
  plb_temac and hard_temac whose hardware versions are 2.00a and
 1.00a
  specifically. I know the newest versions of those hardwares are
 3.00a
 and
  3.00a. Is your driver support the 3.00a version hardware? Also, 

is

 the
  driver from 

http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/

 the
  latest one for Xilinx Temac? If you have some updated version,
 please
 tell
  me the address.
  
  2. Is that driver from the above address able to support SGDMA? 

In

 fact,
 I
  am testing the throughput of the Temac enet by my own little
 program
 which
  is very simple. In the program running on the board, the pseudo
 code
 looks
  just like this:
   for(;;){
 select();
 if(FD_ISSET()){
   recvfrom();
 }
  
 sendto();
   }
  
  The program is just to receive packets from a pc and then 

transfer

 them
  back. But in this condition, the embedded PowerPC CPU is easily
 used by
  100. So I suspect that maybe the DMA is not running properly.
 Could you
  please say something about the DMA in your driver?
  
  Thanks a lot for your telling.
  
  Regards
  Ming
  
  
_

  ���璐逛��杞� MSN Explorer:   http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/
  
  
  --===1695844909==
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  Content-Disposition: inline
  
  ___
  Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
  Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
  https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
  --===1695844909

RE : Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.

2006-11-30 Thread alayrac 
Hi Ming

You will find informations to build linux 2.6 BSP in the file
EDK_8.2\sw\ThirdParty\bsp\linux_2_6_v1_00_a\doc\linux_2_6_v1_00_a.pdf 

This file is installed with plateform Studio

Regards

Chris

CRESITT INDUSTRIE
12 Rue de Blois, BP6744
45067 ORLEANS Cedex 2
Tel : 02.38.49.45.59
Fax :02.38.49.45.55
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Web : http://www.cresitt.com


 -Message d'origine-
 De : linuxppc-embedded-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linuxppc-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
 part de Ming Liu
 Envoyé : jeudi 30 novembre 2006 17:37
 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc : linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
 Objet : Re: Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.
 
 Dear Michael,
 Now I update my Xilinx design software from 8.1 to 8.2 and notice
 that
 there is already linux_2_6 support. Then I generated the BSP for
 linux 2.6.
 I found that there are some differences from the older version, e.g.
 there
 are some files such as XMakefile, xps_connected.cud, etc. I am
 confused
 with this. So could you please give me a hand on how to use such a
 generated BSP to build my linux 2.6 kernel? I cannot find any
 guidance on
 how to do that. Thanks for your help.
 
 BR
 Ming
 
 
 From: Michael Galassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Michael Galassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Ming Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
 Subject: Re: Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.
 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:38:37 -0800
 
 If you use the latest xilinx ISE/EDK/IP update and let it overlay
 your
 mvl source tree with it's files it shouldn't take you more than a
 few
 hours to patch things up to where you can compile a kernel which
 will
 work on the 3.00b IP.  The PHY support is useless but you can work
 around that easily enough.  I've not tried to get any of that
 working
 with a semi-current kernel so if you're not using mvl's flavor of
 2.6.10
 you may run into other issues.
 
 -michael
 
  Dear Andrei,
  I have some questions about your xilinx Temac driver. If possible,
 please
  give me a hand on such confusing problems.
  
  1. I am using the driver from
  http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/, and the IP
 cores
 of
  plb_temac and hard_temac whose hardware versions are 2.00a and
 1.00a
  specifically. I know the newest versions of those hardwares are
 3.00a
 and
  3.00a. Is your driver support the 3.00a version hardware? Also, is
 the
  driver from http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/
 the
  latest one for Xilinx Temac? If you have some updated version,
 please
 tell
  me the address.
  
  2. Is that driver from the above address able to support SGDMA? In
 fact,
 I
  am testing the throughput of the Temac enet by my own little
 program
 which
  is very simple. In the program running on the board, the pseudo
 code
 looks
  just like this:
   for(;;){
 select();
 if(FD_ISSET()){
   recvfrom();
 }
  
 sendto();
   }
  
  The program is just to receive packets from a pc and then transfer
 them
  back. But in this condition, the embedded PowerPC CPU is easily
 used by
  100. So I suspect that maybe the DMA is not running properly.
 Could you
  please say something about the DMA in your driver?
  
  Thanks a lot for your telling.
  
  Regards
  Ming
  
  _
  免费下载 MSN Explorer:   http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/
  
  
  --===1695844909==
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  Content-Disposition: inline
  
  ___
  Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
  Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
  https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
  --===1695844909==--
 
 _
 与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger:  http://messenger.msn.com/cn


___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

Re: RE : Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.

2006-11-30 Thread Pradeep Sampath 
Hi Ming,
   
  See previous postings from Robert Corley. 
   
  Pradeep

alayrac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Ming

You will find informations to build linux 2.6 BSP in the file
EDK_8.2\sw\ThirdParty\bsp\linux_2_6_v1_00_a\doc\linux_2_6_v1_00_a.pdf 

This file is installed with plateform Studio

Regards

Chris

CRESITT INDUSTRIE
12 Rue de Blois, BP6744
45067 ORLEANS Cedex 2
Tel : 02.38.49.45.59
Fax :02.38.49.45.55
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Web : http://www.cresitt.com


 -Message d'origine-
 De : linuxppc-embedded-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linuxppc-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
 part de Ming Liu
 Envoyé : jeudi 30 novembre 2006 17:37
 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc : linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
 Objet : Re: Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.
 
 Dear Michael,
 Now I update my Xilinx design software from 8.1 to 8.2 and notice
 that
 there is already linux_2_6 support. Then I generated the BSP for
 linux 2.6.
 I found that there are some differences from the older version, e.g.
 there
 are some files such as XMakefile, xps_connected.cud, etc. I am
 confused
 with this. So could you please give me a hand on how to use such a
 generated BSP to build my linux 2.6 kernel? I cannot find any
 guidance on
 how to do that. Thanks for your help.
 
 BR
 Ming
 
 
 From: Michael Galassi 
 Reply-To: Michael Galassi 
 To: Ming Liu 
 CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
 Subject: Re: Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.
 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:38:37 -0800
 
 If you use the latest xilinx ISE/EDK/IP update and let it overlay
 your
 mvl source tree with it's files it shouldn't take you more than a
 few
 hours to patch things up to where you can compile a kernel which
 will
 work on the 3.00b IP. The PHY support is useless but you can work
 around that easily enough. I've not tried to get any of that
 working
 with a semi-current kernel so if you're not using mvl's flavor of
 2.6.10
 you may run into other issues.
 
 -michael
 
  Dear Andrei,
  I have some questions about your xilinx Temac driver. If possible,
 please
  give me a hand on such confusing problems.
  
  1. I am using the driver from
  http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/, and the IP
 cores
 of
  plb_temac and hard_temac whose hardware versions are 2.00a and
 1.00a
  specifically. I know the newest versions of those hardwares are
 3.00a
 and
  3.00a. Is your driver support the 3.00a version hardware? Also, is
 the
  driver from http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/
 the
  latest one for Xilinx Temac? If you have some updated version,
 please
 tell
  me the address.
  
  2. Is that driver from the above address able to support SGDMA? In
 fact,
 I
  am testing the throughput of the Temac enet by my own little
 program
 which
  is very simple. In the program running on the board, the pseudo
 code
 looks
  just like this:
   for(;;){
   select();
   if(FD_ISSET()){
   recvfrom();
   }
  
   sendto();
   }
  
  The program is just to receive packets from a pc and then transfer
 them
  back. But in this condition, the embedded PowerPC CPU is easily
 used by
  100. So I suspect that maybe the DMA is not running properly.
 Could you
  please say something about the DMA in your driver?
  
  Thanks a lot for your telling.
  
  Regards
  Ming
  
  _
  免费下载 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/
  
  
  --===1695844909==
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  Content-Disposition: inline
  
  ___
  Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
  Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
  https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
  --===1695844909==--
 
 _
 与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger: 
http://messenger.msn.com/cn


___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.

2006-11-29 Thread Ming Liu 

Dear Andrei,
I have some questions about your xilinx Temac driver. If possible, please 
give me a hand on such confusing problems. 

1. I am using the driver from 
http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/, and the IP cores of 
plb_temac and hard_temac whose hardware versions are 2.00a and 1.00a 
specifically. I know the newest versions of those hardwares are 3.00a and 
3.00a. Is your driver support the 3.00a version hardware? Also, is the 
driver from http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/ the 
latest one for Xilinx Temac? If you have some updated version, please tell 
me the address. 

2. Is that driver from the above address able to support SGDMA? In fact, I 
am testing the throughput of the Temac enet by my own little program which 
is very simple. In the program running on the board, the pseudo code looks 
just like this:

for(;;){
  select();
  if(FD_ISSET()){
recvfrom();
  }
  
  sendto();

}

The program is just to receive packets from a pc and then transfer them 
back. But in this condition, the embedded PowerPC CPU is easily used by 
100. So I suspect that maybe the DMA is not running properly. Could you 
please say something about the DMA in your driver? 


Thanks a lot for your telling.

Regards
Ming

_
免费下载 MSN Explorer:   http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/  

___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

Re: Some questions about the Xilinx Temac driver.

2006-11-29 Thread Michael Galassi 
If you use the latest xilinx ISE/EDK/IP update and let it overlay your
mvl source tree with it's files it shouldn't take you more than a few
hours to patch things up to where you can compile a kernel which will
work on the 3.00b IP.  The PHY support is useless but you can work
around that easily enough.  I've not tried to get any of that working
with a semi-current kernel so if you're not using mvl's flavor of 2.6.10
you may run into other issues.

-michael

Dear Andrei,
I have some questions about your xilinx Temac driver. If possible, please 
give me a hand on such confusing problems. 

1. I am using the driver from 
http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/, and the IP cores of 
plb_temac and hard_temac whose hardware versions are 2.00a and 1.00a 
specifically. I know the newest versions of those hardwares are 3.00a and 
3.00a. Is your driver support the 3.00a version hardware? Also, is the 
driver from http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/ the 
latest one for Xilinx Temac? If you have some updated version, please tell 
me the address. 

2. Is that driver from the above address able to support SGDMA? In fact, I 
am testing the throughput of the Temac enet by my own little program which 
is very simple. In the program running on the board, the pseudo code looks 
just like this:
 for(;;){
   select();
   if(FD_ISSET()){
 recvfrom();
   }
   
   sendto();
 }

The program is just to receive packets from a pc and then transfer them 
back. But in this condition, the embedded PowerPC CPU is easily used by 
100. So I suspect that maybe the DMA is not running properly. Could you 
please say something about the DMA in your driver? 

Thanks a lot for your telling.

Regards
Ming

_
Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ MSN Explorer:   http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/  


--===1695844909==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
--===1695844909==--
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded