Re: [Linuxptp-devel] CMLDS Patches
Thank you very much Richard! Best regards, -Fred On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 6:23 AM Richard Cochran wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:44:27AM +0200, Walfred Tedeschi wrote: > > On 11.08.23 19:13, Richard Cochran wrote: > > > The CMLDS series will require careful review. My superficial review > > > gave me the impression that the approach was too complex. > > Do you have an indication on how it could be simplified? > > I commented on the v2 patch series just now. > > Thanks, > Richard > ___ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
Re: [Linuxptp-devel] CMLDS Patches
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:44:27AM +0200, Walfred Tedeschi wrote: > On 11.08.23 19:13, Richard Cochran wrote: > > The CMLDS series will require careful review. My superficial review > > gave me the impression that the approach was too complex. > Do you have an indication on how it could be simplified? I commented on the v2 patch series just now. Thanks, Richard ___ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
Re: [Linuxptp-devel] CMLDS Patches
On 11.08.23 19:13, Richard Cochran wrote: HI Richard, Thanks a lot for the prompt answer! On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 02:51:23PM +0200, Walfred Tedeschi via Linuxptp-devel wrote: Dear List, I kindly come to you to ask attention on the patches regarding the multi-domain implementation. I have limited time for reviewing patches, but I will eventually get to this series. The CMLDS series will require careful review. My superficial review gave me the impression that the approach was too complex. Do you have an indication on how it could be simplified? Also, I tend to merge obvious bug fixes and improvements first, because those require fewer brain cells. Thanks, Richard Thank you! -Fred ___ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
Re: [Linuxptp-devel] CMLDS Patches
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 02:51:23PM +0200, Walfred Tedeschi via Linuxptp-devel wrote: > Dear List, > > I kindly come to you to ask attention on the patches regarding the > multi-domain implementation. I have limited time for reviewing patches, but I will eventually get to this series. The CMLDS series will require careful review. My superficial review gave me the impression that the approach was too complex. Also, I tend to merge obvious bug fixes and improvements first, because those require fewer brain cells. Thanks, Richard ___ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
[Linuxptp-devel] CMLDS Patches
Dear List, I kindly come to you to ask attention on the patches regarding the multi-domain implementation. Having a different role than my colleagues that are presenting the patch for review, I write you to bring a bit more motivation for the series. Multi-domain is an important part for IEC 60802 (TSN Profile for Industrial Automation) and the industry is arriving at this point. Said that, the patches presented here: https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxptp/mailman/message/37844977/ Are part of this journey and will increase the users of linuxptp into the industry, and for some sectors like energy generation, multi-domain is requirement as the global time has to be kept to correlate control with external events. In this sense, we would like to thank who already provided feedback and kindly ask for additional feedback on the series to continue growing the usage of linuxptp. Thanks a lot for the good work and best regards, Walfred Tedeschi ___ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
