Re: [lisp] Review for LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases

2022-12-12 Thread Dino Farinacci

> 
> Hi Dino,
> 
>> On 9 Dec 2022, at 22:20, Dino Farinacci  wrote:
>> 
>> I agree with all your comments and will do a revision. 
>> 
>> Regarding Type 5, that type was previously allocated *for this draft*. 
>> Sometimes it is hard to remember since so much time has passed.
> 
> Indeed it has been quite some time….
> 
> If you look Section 4.3 of RFC 8060 you can see Type 5 LCAF Format that is 
> completely incompatible with the specs in this document.

We need to update RFC 8060 so the format in the geo draft matches and points to 
this use-case draft. That is what we have done with the other LCAF types. So we 
just need to be consistent.

> What about asking for type 15 and name it “extended Geo-coordinates”?

There is no point to have 2 code points for Geo-Coordinates.

Want me to start on a 8060bis document?

Dino

> 
> Ciao
> 
> L.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> So we do not need a new type.
>> 
>> Dino
>> 
>>> On Dec 9, 2022, at 6:38 AM, Luigi Iannone  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Dino,
>>> 
>>> I reviewed the lisp-geo document. My comments inline.
>>> 
>>> Ciao
>>> 
>>> L.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 
 
 
 
 
 Network Working Group   D. Farinacci
 Internet-Draft   lispers.net
 Intended status: Experimental   23 November 2022
 Expires: 27 May 2023
 
 
   LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases
   draft-ietf-lisp-geo-00
 
 Abstract
 
 This draft describes how Geo-Coordinates can be used in the LISP
 Architecture and Protocols.
 
>>> 
>>> Would be good to add more word. The document does 2 things: propose uses 
>>> cases, define geo coordinates encoding.
>>> 
>>> 
 Status of This Memo
 
 This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
 provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
 
 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
 Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
 working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
 Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
 
 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
 and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
 time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
 material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
 
 This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 May 2023.
 
 Copyright Notice
 
 Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.
 
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
 license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
 Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
 and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
 extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
 described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
 provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Farinacci  Expires 27 May 2023  [Page 1]
 Internet-DraftLISP Geo-Coordinate Use-CasesNovember 2022
 
 
 Table of Contents
 
 1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
 2.  Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
 3.  Geo-Points in RLOC-records  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
 4.  Geo-Prefixes in EID-records and RLOC-records  . . . . . . . .   3
 5.  Geo-Prefix and Geo-Point Encodings  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
 6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
 7.  Privacy Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
 8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
 9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
 Appendix A.  Acknowledgments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
 Appendix B.  Document Change Log  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   B.1.  Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-geo-00 . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   B.2.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-15  . . . . . . . . .  11
   B.3.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-14  . . . . . . . . .  11
   B.4.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-13  . . . . . . . . .  11
   B.5.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-12  . . . . . . . . .  11
   B.6.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-11  . . . . . . . . .  11
   B.7.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-10  . . 

Re: [lisp] Review for LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases

2022-12-12 Thread Luigi Iannone
Hi Dino,

> On 9 Dec 2022, at 22:20, Dino Farinacci  wrote:
> 
> I agree with all your comments and will do a revision. 
> 
> Regarding Type 5, that type was previously allocated *for this draft*. 
> Sometimes it is hard to remember since so much time has passed.

Indeed it has been quite some time….

If you look Section 4.3 of RFC 8060 you can see Type 5 LCAF Format that is 
completely incompatible with the specs in this document.

What about asking for type 15 and name it “extended Geo-coordinates”?

Ciao

L.



> 
> So we do not need a new type.
> 
> Dino
> 
>> On Dec 9, 2022, at 6:38 AM, Luigi Iannone  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Dino,
>> 
>> I reviewed the lisp-geo document. My comments inline.
>> 
>> Ciao
>> 
>> L.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Network Working Group   D. Farinacci
>>> Internet-Draft   lispers.net
>>> Intended status: Experimental   23 November 2022
>>> Expires: 27 May 2023
>>> 
>>> 
>>>LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases
>>>draft-ietf-lisp-geo-00
>>> 
>>> Abstract
>>> 
>>>  This draft describes how Geo-Coordinates can be used in the LISP
>>>  Architecture and Protocols.
>>> 
>> 
>> Would be good to add more word. The document does 2 things: propose uses 
>> cases, define geo coordinates encoding.
>> 
>> 
>>> Status of This Memo
>>> 
>>>  This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
>>>  provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
>>> 
>>>  Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
>>>  Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
>>>  working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
>>>  Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
>>> 
>>>  Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
>>>  and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
>>>  time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
>>>  material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
>>> 
>>>  This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 May 2023.
>>> 
>>> Copyright Notice
>>> 
>>>  Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
>>>  document authors.  All rights reserved.
>>> 
>>>  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
>>>  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
>>>  license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
>>>  Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
>>>  and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
>>>  extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
>>>  described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
>>>  provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Farinacci  Expires 27 May 2023  [Page 1]
>>> Internet-DraftLISP Geo-Coordinate Use-CasesNovember 2022
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Table of Contents
>>> 
>>>  1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
>>>  2.  Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
>>>  3.  Geo-Points in RLOC-records  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
>>>  4.  Geo-Prefixes in EID-records and RLOC-records  . . . . . . . .   3
>>>  5.  Geo-Prefix and Geo-Point Encodings  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
>>>  6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
>>>  7.  Privacy Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>>>  8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>>>  9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>>>9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>>>9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
>>>  Appendix A.  Acknowledgments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
>>>  Appendix B.  Document Change Log  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
>>>B.1.  Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-geo-00 . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
>>>B.2.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-15  . . . . . . . . .  11
>>>B.3.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-14  . . . . . . . . .  11
>>>B.4.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-13  . . . . . . . . .  11
>>>B.5.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-12  . . . . . . . . .  11
>>>B.6.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-11  . . . . . . . . .  11
>>>B.7.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-10  . . . . . . . . .  11
>>>B.8.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-09  . . . . . . . . .  11
>>>B.9.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-08  . . . . . . . . .  11
>>>B.10. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-07  . . . . . . . . .  12
>>>B.11. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-06  . . . . . . . . .  12
>>>B.12. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-05  . . . . . . . . .  12
>>>

Re: [lisp] Review for LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases

2022-12-09 Thread Dino Farinacci
I agree with all your comments and will do a revision. 

Regarding Type 5, that type was previously allocated *for this draft*. 
Sometimes it is hard to remember since so much time has passed.

So we do not need a new type.

Dino

> On Dec 9, 2022, at 6:38 AM, Luigi Iannone  wrote:
> 
> Hi Dino,
> 
> I reviewed the lisp-geo document. My comments inline.
> 
> Ciao
> 
> L.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Network Working Group   D. Farinacci
>> Internet-Draft   lispers.net
>> Intended status: Experimental   23 November 2022
>> Expires: 27 May 2023
>> 
>> 
>> LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases
>> draft-ietf-lisp-geo-00
>> 
>> Abstract
>> 
>>   This draft describes how Geo-Coordinates can be used in the LISP
>>   Architecture and Protocols.
>> 
> 
> Would be good to add more word. The document does 2 things: propose uses 
> cases, define geo coordinates encoding.
> 
> 
>> Status of This Memo
>> 
>>   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
>>   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
>> 
>>   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
>>   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
>>   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
>>   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
>> 
>>   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
>>   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
>>   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
>>   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
>> 
>>   This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 May 2023.
>> 
>> Copyright Notice
>> 
>>   Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
>>   document authors.  All rights reserved.
>> 
>>   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
>>   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
>>   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
>>   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
>>   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
>>   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
>>   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
>>   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Farinacci  Expires 27 May 2023  [Page 1]
>> Internet-DraftLISP Geo-Coordinate Use-CasesNovember 2022
>> 
>> 
>> Table of Contents
>> 
>>   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
>>   2.  Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
>>   3.  Geo-Points in RLOC-records  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
>>   4.  Geo-Prefixes in EID-records and RLOC-records  . . . . . . . .   3
>>   5.  Geo-Prefix and Geo-Point Encodings  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
>>   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
>>   7.  Privacy Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>>   8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>>   9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>> 9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>> 9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
>>   Appendix A.  Acknowledgments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
>>   Appendix B.  Document Change Log  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
>> B.1.  Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-geo-00 . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
>> B.2.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-15  . . . . . . . . .  11
>> B.3.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-14  . . . . . . . . .  11
>> B.4.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-13  . . . . . . . . .  11
>> B.5.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-12  . . . . . . . . .  11
>> B.6.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-11  . . . . . . . . .  11
>> B.7.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-10  . . . . . . . . .  11
>> B.8.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-09  . . . . . . . . .  11
>> B.9.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-08  . . . . . . . . .  11
>> B.10. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-07  . . . . . . . . .  12
>> B.11. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-06  . . . . . . . . .  12
>> B.12. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-05  . . . . . . . . .  12
>> B.13. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-04  . . . . . . . . .  12
>> B.14. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-03  . . . . . . . . .  12
>> B.15. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-02  . . . . . . . . .  12
>> B.16. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-01  . . . . . . . . .  12
>> B.17. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-00  . . . . . . . . .  13
>>   Author's Address  . . . . 

[lisp] Review for LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases

2022-12-09 Thread Luigi Iannone
Hi Dino,

I reviewed the lisp-geo document. My comments inline.

Ciao

L.







> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Network Working Group   D. Farinacci
> Internet-Draft   lispers.net
> Intended status: Experimental   23 November 2022
> Expires: 27 May 2023
> 
> 
>  LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases
>  draft-ietf-lisp-geo-00
> 
> Abstract
> 
>This draft describes how Geo-Coordinates can be used in the LISP
>Architecture and Protocols.
> 

Would be good to add more word. The document does 2 things: propose uses cases, 
define geo coordinates encoding.


> Status of This Memo
> 
>This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
>provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
> 
>Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
>Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
>working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
>Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
> 
>Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
>and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
>time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
>material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
> 
>This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 May 2023.
> 
> Copyright Notice
> 
>Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
>document authors.  All rights reserved.
> 
>This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
>Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
>license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
>Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
>and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
>extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
>described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
>provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Farinacci  Expires 27 May 2023  [Page 1]
> Internet-DraftLISP Geo-Coordinate Use-CasesNovember 2022
> 
> 
> Table of Contents
> 
>1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
>2.  Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
>3.  Geo-Points in RLOC-records  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
>4.  Geo-Prefixes in EID-records and RLOC-records  . . . . . . . .   3
>5.  Geo-Prefix and Geo-Point Encodings  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
>6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
>7.  Privacy Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>  9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
>  9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
>Appendix A.  Acknowledgments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
>Appendix B.  Document Change Log  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
>  B.1.  Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-geo-00 . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
>  B.2.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-15  . . . . . . . . .  11
>  B.3.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-14  . . . . . . . . .  11
>  B.4.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-13  . . . . . . . . .  11
>  B.5.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-12  . . . . . . . . .  11
>  B.6.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-11  . . . . . . . . .  11
>  B.7.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-10  . . . . . . . . .  11
>  B.8.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-09  . . . . . . . . .  11
>  B.9.  Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-08  . . . . . . . . .  11
>  B.10. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-07  . . . . . . . . .  12
>  B.11. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-06  . . . . . . . . .  12
>  B.12. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-05  . . . . . . . . .  12
>  B.13. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-04  . . . . . . . . .  12
>  B.14. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-03  . . . . . . . . .  12
>  B.15. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-02  . . . . . . . . .  12
>  B.16. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-01  . . . . . . . . .  12
>  B.17. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-00  . . . . . . . . .  13
>Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
> 
> 1.  Introduction
> 
>The LISP architecture and protocols [RFC9300] introduces two new
>namespaces, Endpoint Identifiers (EIDs) and Routing Locators (RLOCs)
>which are intended to separate the semantics of identity and
>topological location from an IP address.  To provide flexibility for
>