Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Dan Langille
There's been a bug open for 14 days regarding the configuration issues:

https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307

I will try the packaged binaries again.

 On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Porter jpor...@electricsheepfencing.com 
 wrote:
 
 I'd just like to point out, that the Webui installs binaries via PBI
 into different locations, than the pkg installer does, and this is likely to
 cause problems mixing them.  Installing packages via pkg that are
 already in the pfsenes package repo is likely to cause a lot of grief
 down the road.  If the official package doesn't work, please open a
 ticket on https://redmind.pfsenes.org under Packages.  There are a
 number of broken ones, we're working on getting fixed.
 
 On 2/8/2015 10:07 PM, Brady, Mike wrote:
 The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the
 forum post that I referenced.
 
 On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote:
 On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz
 wrote:
 
 It isn't you or the binaries.
 
 I also think it's the binaries.
 
 The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been
 for a while.  Even prior to 2.2.
 
 I agree those are broken.  However, I am unable to get the webui
 packages binaries to work.  However, installing via pkg works fine,
 with the same configuration file.
 
 
 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0
 
 It was broken long before that.  :)
 
  https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0
 
 
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
 
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

— 
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/





___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Brady, Mike
Yes backups run successfully.  Easiest thing to do while testing is to 
just run a status client command in bconsole.  Once that works you 
should be good to go.


On 2015-02-10 00:46, Dan Langille wrote:

Before I go down that road again: by working, do you mean you've
successfully run a backup?

--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/


On Feb 8, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz 
wrote:


The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the 
forum post that I referenced.



On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz 
wrote:

It isn't you or the binaries.

I also think it's the binaries.
The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been 
for a while.  Even prior to 2.2.

I agree those are broken.  However, I am unable to get the webui
packages binaries to work.  However, installing via pkg works fine,
with the same configuration file.

https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0

It was broken long before that.  :)
 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold


Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Dan Langille
Status client was failing.  That is what I spent hours upon.

 On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 
 Yes backups run successfully.  Easiest thing to do while testing is to just 
 run a status client command in bconsole.  Once that works you should be good 
 to go.
 
 On 2015-02-10 00:46, Dan Langille wrote:
 Before I go down that road again: by working, do you mean you've
 successfully run a backup?
 --
 Dan Langille
 http://langille.org/
 On Feb 8, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the forum 
 post that I referenced.
 On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote:
 On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 It isn't you or the binaries.
 I also think it's the binaries.
 The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a 
 while.  Even prior to 2.2.
 I agree those are broken.  However, I am unable to get the webui
 packages binaries to work.  However, installing via pkg works fine,
 with the same configuration file.
 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0
 It was broken long before that.  :)
 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

— 
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/





___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Dan Langille
No mixed binaries were used in this endeavor.

 On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Porter jpor...@electricsheepfencing.com 
 wrote:
 
 I'd just like to point out, that the Webui installs binaries via PBI
 into different locations, than the pkg installer does, and this is likely to
 cause problems mixing them.  Installing packages via pkg that are
 already in the pfsenes package repo is likely to cause a lot of grief
 down the road.  If the official package doesn't work, please open a
 ticket on https://redmind.pfsenes.org under Packages.  There are a
 number of broken ones, we're working on getting fixed.
 
 On 2/8/2015 10:07 PM, Brady, Mike wrote:
 The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the
 forum post that I referenced.
 
 On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote:
 On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz
 wrote:
 
 It isn't you or the binaries.
 
 I also think it's the binaries.
 
 The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been
 for a while.  Even prior to 2.2.
 
 I agree those are broken.  However, I am unable to get the webui
 packages binaries to work.  However, installing via pkg works fine,
 with the same configuration file.
 
 
 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0
 
 It was broken long before that.  :)
 
  https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0
 
 
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
 
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

— 
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/





___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Dan Langille
PLEASE NOTE: Once I removed the PBI binaries and tried pkg binaries, I was then 
able to run
status client and run backups.  This was done *without* modifying the 
configuration files on the client.

 On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 
 Yes backups run successfully.  Easiest thing to do while testing is to just 
 run a status client command in bconsole.  Once that works you should be good 
 to go.
 
 On 2015-02-10 00:46, Dan Langille wrote:
 Before I go down that road again: by working, do you mean you've
 successfully run a backup?
 --
 Dan Langille
 http://langille.org/
 On Feb 8, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the forum 
 post that I referenced.
 On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote:
 On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 It isn't you or the binaries.
 I also think it's the binaries.
 The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a 
 while.  Even prior to 2.2.
 I agree those are broken.  However, I am unable to get the webui
 packages binaries to work.  However, installing via pkg works fine,
 with the same configuration file.
 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0
 It was broken long before that.  :)
 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

— 
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/





___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Jim Pingle
On 02/09/2015 11:30 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
 There's been a bug open for 14 days regarding the configuration issues:
 
 https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307
 
 I will try the packaged binaries again.

FYI for others (Dan already knows from Twitter):

Bacula should be OK now on 2.2, as of package version 1.0.6.

The main problem was the paths being used for the various configuration
file and startup script references. Once those were fixed up things seem
to be OK.

There is still some awkwardness in how to set the package GUI up but
that's the same as it always was. Have to add two directors, one local
for the firewall itself and another for the remote bacula server.

There is still a lingering issue with the rc script not restarting
properly but we're looking into that as well. Not as critical as the
other issues at least.

If anyone wants to work on making the GUI more intuitive, feel free to
collaborate and submit some patches.

Jim

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold


Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Dan Langille

 On Feb 9, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
 
 On 02/09/2015 11:30 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
 There's been a bug open for 14 days regarding the configuration issues:
 
 https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307
 
 I will try the packaged binaries again.
 
 FYI for others (Dan already knows from Twitter):
 
 Bacula should be OK now on 2.2, as of package version 1.0.6.
 
 The main problem was the paths being used for the various configuration
 file and startup script references. Once those were fixed up things seem
 to be OK.
 
 There is still some awkwardness in how to set the package GUI up but
 that's the same as it always was. Have to add two directors, one local
 for the firewall itself and another for the remote bacula server.
 
 There is still a lingering issue with the rc script not restarting
 properly but we're looking into that as well. Not as critical as the
 other issues at least.
 
 If anyone wants to work on making the GUI more intuitive, feel free to
 collaborate and submit some patches.

Thanks Jim.

— 
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/





___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Dan Langille
Short version of this post: I removed the pkg, tried PBI, didn't work, 
installed pkg, worked.

Here is what I just tried:

* pkg delete bacula-client
* install bacula-client via webgui
* copy my working configuration file:
  cp  /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf 
/usr/pbi/bacula-amd64/local/etc/bacula-fd.conf
* /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd  -u root -g wheel -v -c  
/usr/pbi/bacula-amd64/local/etc/bacula-fd.conf

*status client=bast-fd
Connecting to Client bast-fd at bast.int.unixathome.org:9102
Failed to connect to Client bast-fd.

You have messages.
*m
09-Feb 17:05 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: Unable to authenticate with File 
daemon at bast.int.unixathome.org:9102. Possible causes:
Passwords or names not the same or
Maximum Concurrent Jobs exceeded on the FD or
FD networking messed up (restart daemon).
Please see 
http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Bacula_Freque_Asked_Questi.html#SECTION0026
 for help.
*

To go back to the pkg binaries:

* delete the PBI bacula via the webui
* confirm it is no longer running / installed:

 ps auwx | grep bacula
root   44932   0.0  0.4  61028  7748  -  Ss4:58PM 0:00.02 
/usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c 
/usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf
root   71389   0.0  0.1  18884  2376  0  S+5:06PM 0:00.00 grep bacula
[2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: 

Oh, it's still running after PBI removal. kill it:

[2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: kill -TERM 44932
[2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: ps auwx | grep bacula
root   68728   0.0  0.1  18884  2376  0  S+5:11PM 0:00.00 grep bacula
[2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: 

Yes, it's really gone:

ls -l /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd
ls: /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd: No such file or directory

And the conf file is still there, good:

ls -l  /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf
-rw-r-  1 bacula  bacula  493 Feb  8 22:17 
/usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf


Now it's dead.  Let's install via pkg:

 pkg install bacula-client
Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue...
FreeBSD repository is up-to-date.
All repositories are up-to-date.
Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
The following 2 packages will be affected (of 0 checked):

New packages to be INSTALLED:
bacula-client: 7.0.5_2
lzo2: 2.08_1

The process will require 1 MiB more space.

Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y
[1/2] Installing lzo2-2.08_1...
[1/2] Extracting lzo2-2.08_1: 100%
[2/2] Installing bacula-client-7.0.5_2...
=== Creating users and/or groups.
Using existing group 'bacula'.
Using existing user 'bacula'.
[2/2] Extracting bacula-client-7.0.5_2: 100%
Message for bacula-client-7.0.5_2:
 


NOTE:
Sample files are installed in /usr/local/etc/bacula:

  bconsole.conf.sample, bacula-fd.conf.sample





It's back:

ls -l /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  225067 Jan 28 12:46 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd



Start it:

[2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u 
root -g wheel -v -c  /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf
[2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: ps auwx | grep bacula
root   50020   0.3  0.4  54288  7256  -  Ss5:14PM 0:00.01 
/usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c 
/usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf
root   50266   0.0  0.1  18884  2376  0  S+5:14PM 0:00.00 grep bacula
[2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root:

and test it:

*status client=bast-fd
Connecting to Client bast-fd at bast.int.unixathome.org:9102

bast-fd Version: 7.0.5 (28 July 2014)  amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0 freebsd 
10.0-RELEASE-p9
Daemon started 09-Feb-15 17:14. Jobs: run=0 running=0.
 Heap: heap=0 smbytes=186,074 max_bytes=186,221 bufs=52 max_bufs=53
 Sizes: boffset_t=8 size_t=8 debug=0 trace=0 mode=0,0 bwlimit=0kB/s

Running Jobs:
Director connected at: 09-Feb-15 17:14
No Jobs running.


Terminated Jobs:
 JobId  LevelFiles  Bytes   Status   FinishedName 
===
198845  Full  6115.6 K  OK   08-Feb-15 23:07 
bast_pfsense_config.xml
198850  Incr  1113.5 K  OK   09-Feb-15 05:55 
bast_pfsense_config.xml

*







 On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 
 Yes backups run successfully.  Easiest thing to do while testing is to just 
 run a status client command in bconsole.  Once that works you should be good 
 to go.
 
 On 2015-02-10 00:46, Dan Langille wrote:
 Before I go down that road again: by working, do you mean you've
 successfully run a backup?
 --
 Dan Langille
 http://langille.org/
 On Feb 8, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the forum 
 post that I referenced.

Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Brady, Mike

Thanks for the update Jim.

It does now work, after some messing around.  But, the required messing 
around may well have been required due to the messing around that I had 
done previously, so your mileage may vary.


What I did:
1) Reinstall the package in the GUI
2) Delete and redo the the configuration on the GUI
3) ssh on to the pfsense box and kill the running bacula-fd.  This was 
still there from before the reinstall!  Stopping/restarting in the GUI 
silently did nothing.


For reference the running process should be:
/usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c 
/usr/pbi/bacula-amd64/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf


mine was still:
/usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c 
/usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf


I have now done this on two machines and status client command in 
bconsole connects for both.  I haven't done a backup yet.


On 2015-02-10 08:10, Jim Pingle wrote:

On 02/09/2015 11:30 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
There's been a bug open for 14 days regarding the configuration 
issues:


https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307

I will try the packaged binaries again.


FYI for others (Dan already knows from Twitter):

Bacula should be OK now on 2.2, as of package version 1.0.6.

The main problem was the paths being used for the various configuration
file and startup script references. Once those were fixed up things 
seem

to be OK.

There is still some awkwardness in how to set the package GUI up but
that's the same as it always was. Have to add two directors, one local
for the firewall itself and another for the remote bacula server.

There is still a lingering issue with the rc script not restarting
properly but we're looking into that as well. Not as critical as the
other issues at least.

If anyone wants to work on making the GUI more intuitive, feel free to
collaborate and submit some patches.

Jim

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold


Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Dan Langille
Before I go down that road again: by working, do you mean you've successfully 
run a backup?

-- 
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/


 On Feb 8, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 
 The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the forum post 
 that I referenced.
 
 On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote:
 On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 It isn't you or the binaries.
 I also think it's the binaries.
 The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a 
 while.  Even prior to 2.2.
 I agree those are broken.  However, I am unable to get the webui
 packages binaries to work.  However, installing via pkg works fine,
 with the same configuration file.
 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0
 It was broken long before that.  :)
  https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold


Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-09 Thread Jeremy Porter
I'd just like to point out, that the Webui installs binaries via PBI
into different locations, than the pkg installer does, and this is likely to
cause problems mixing them.  Installing packages via pkg that are
already in the pfsenes package repo is likely to cause a lot of grief
down the road.  If the official package doesn't work, please open a
ticket on https://redmind.pfsenes.org under Packages.  There are a
number of broken ones, we're working on getting fixed.

On 2/8/2015 10:07 PM, Brady, Mike wrote:
 The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the
 forum post that I referenced.

 On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote:
 On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz
 wrote:

 It isn't you or the binaries.

 I also think it's the binaries.

 The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been
 for a while.  Even prior to 2.2.

 I agree those are broken.  However, I am unable to get the webui
 packages binaries to work.  However, installing via pkg works fine,
 with the same configuration file.


 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0

 It was broken long before that.  :)

   https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0


 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold


[pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-08 Thread Dan Langille
Let me add my voice to the post at 
http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/2015-February/008038.html

I was running daily backups prior to my upgrade to 2.2.

pfSense creates a mangled configuration file.  I filed a bug: 
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307

Today, I managed to get bacula-fd running by manually creating 
/usr/local/etc/bacula and placing a valid bacula-fd.conf file in that directory.

I am unable to get bacula-fd to authenticate.

At this point, I'm beginning to suspect the bacula binaries.  Installing and 
running via pkg succeeds with the same configuration file.

Disclosure: I am a committer on the Bacula project and the FreeBSD maintainer 
for the Bacula ports. I'm not a Bacula novice,
but I would like it if someone showed me what I am doing wrong.

— 
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/





___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-08 Thread Brady, Mike
It isn't you or the binaries.  The configuration and startup scripts are 
just broken and have been for a while.  Even prior to 2.2.


https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0

On 2015-02-09 11:57, Dan Langille wrote:

Let me add my voice to the post at
http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/2015-February/008038.html

I was running daily backups prior to my upgrade to 2.2.

pfSense creates a mangled configuration file.  I filed a bug:
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307

Today, I managed to get bacula-fd running by manually creating
/usr/local/etc/bacula and placing a valid bacula-fd.conf file in that
directory.

I am unable to get bacula-fd to authenticate.

At this point, I'm beginning to suspect the bacula binaries.
Installing and running via pkg succeeds with the same configuration
file.

Disclosure: I am a committer on the Bacula project and the FreeBSD
maintainer for the Bacula ports. I'm not a Bacula novice,
but I would like it if someone showed me what I am doing wrong.

—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/





___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-08 Thread Dan Langille
On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
 
 It isn't you or the binaries.  

I also think it's the binaries.

 The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a 
 while.  Even prior to 2.2.

I agree those are broken.  However, I am unable to get the webui packages 
binaries to work.  However, installing via pkg works fine, with the same 
configuration file.

 
 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0

It was broken long before that.  :)

  https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0

 
 On 2015-02-09 11:57, Dan Langille wrote:
 Let me add my voice to the post at
 http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/2015-February/008038.html
 I was running daily backups prior to my upgrade to 2.2.
 pfSense creates a mangled configuration file.  I filed a bug:
 https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307
 Today, I managed to get bacula-fd running by manually creating
 /usr/local/etc/bacula and placing a valid bacula-fd.conf file in that
 directory.
 I am unable to get bacula-fd to authenticate.
 At this point, I'm beginning to suspect the bacula binaries.
 Installing and running via pkg succeeds with the same configuration
 file.
 Disclosure: I am a committer on the Bacula project and the FreeBSD
 maintainer for the Bacula ports. I'm not a Bacula novice,
 but I would like it if someone showed me what I am doing wrong.
 —
 Dan Langille
 http://langille.org/
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
 ___
 pfSense mailing list
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

— 
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/





___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2

2015-02-08 Thread Brady, Mike
The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the forum 
post that I referenced.


On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz 
wrote:


It isn't you or the binaries.


I also think it's the binaries.

The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been 
for a while.  Even prior to 2.2.


I agree those are broken.  However, I am unable to get the webui
packages binaries to work.  However, installing via pkg works fine,
with the same configuration file.



https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0


It was broken long before that.  :)

  https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0



___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold