Re: [pfSense] Samba4 package and extend services with pfsense

[Kendrick Vargas]

We are talking about a package, right? Something people can choose to
install or... you know... not?

I like the idea of being able to turn on windows domain services on my
router. For sites with smaller installations, or where all-in-one makes
more sense than having a VM server, I don't see where this would be a
problem, so long as it's optional. This isn't any different from DNS from
my perspective. Will it integrate with the pfsense authentication? How
about WINS/DNS/DHCP integration?

I agree that a full on file server with shares is a bit much, but that
should be left up to the end user.

 -peace


On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Diego Barrios s...@dmesg.com.br wrote:

 Sorry but I can`t see any good point for this.

 PFsense is a well known distribution due to the stability of it`s
 core-components and as a Firewall/Router appliance, not an all in one
 distribution.

 There are dozens of linux-based file-server distributions around, even at
 a small-office you can have both PFsense and younameit sharing the same
 physical hardware but on separate VMs.

 My $0.02

 Seko




 --
 *From: *Luiz Gustavo Costa luizgust...@luizgustavo.pro.br
 *To: *list@lists.pfsense.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:49:30 AM
 *Subject: *[pfSense] Samba4 package and extend services with pfsense

 Hi guys !


 I have worked in the Samba4 package for pfsense, not only act as a
 domain member, but also act as a domain controller and i see this as an
 opportunity to extend the pfsense to be more than a firewall and act as
 a new service on the network in a new installation in another hardware
 to act as a domain controller in Active Directory with power tools
 native firewall.

 ...

 ___
 List mailing list
 List@lists.pfsense.org
 http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Re: [pfSense] successor to ALIX is here

[Kendrick Vargas]

Might be a little pricey, but I got Lanner to sell me a single unit. With
the hard drive mounts, etc., it was about $384 shipped and it's been a
champ. I got the 7539 just before they released the 7540. Basically the
same unit, but with Ddr3 and a better cpu.

http://www.lannerinc.com/products/x86-network-appliances/desktop/fw-7540

Comes with 4 Intel PHY's... I've had mine for over a year I believe...
Reach out to them. It isn't like ordering something through Amazon, but
it's not impossible.
On Apr 3, 2014 9:43 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos math...@eternamente.info wrote:


 On Wed, April 2, 2014 11:35, Eugen Leitl wrote:
 
  Apu.1c
 
 http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Embeddded-Mainboard-mit-x86-CPU-und-Coreboot-2160404.html
 
  http://www.pcengines.ch/apu1c.htm
 
  in stock, EURO 105.13

 a little off, but are those better as home fileserver then the soekris
 6501 ?

 for some bus links, soekris is really slow on that matter (I have one,
 tested more than once :( )

 looking for small form factor system to house an USB/eSATA HD enclosure. I
 talked to pcengines
 staff and said there is another on plans, but will take some time. So I
 ask :)

 thanks,

 matheus

 --
 We will call you Cygnus,
 The God of balance you shall be

 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
 Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
 ___
 List mailing list
 List@lists.pfsense.org
 https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Re: [pfSense] looking for perfect pfsense box for home?

[Kendrick Vargas]

Don't know how late I am to the game on this suggestion, but I am quite
happy with the Lanner Inc. product I bought. I was able to get them to sell
me a single unit, the cost was fine for my needs (at the time an Atom
D510). They're rackable, and my FW-7539 has been running non-stop for
years. I can't speak for performance as my needs are really simple.

http://www.lannerinc.com/products/x86-network-appliances/desktop/

Just make sure to get the components necessary to boot it up (you may need
vga adapters, etc.)


 -peace

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Dave Warren  wrote:

> On 2016-08-20 04:02, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Aug 20, 2016, at 3:10 AM, Dave Warren  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016-08-03 08:43, Steve Yates wrote:
 I'm being serious but what is your rationale for not using
 pfSense's/NetGate's?

 https://www.pfsense.org/products/

 The "cheap" part (< $299)?  We tried a "build our own" approach and
 it's tough to get a small package.  Any old PC will do just fine if one
 adds an SSD but as someone pointed out that may use far more power in the
 long run.

>>> For me, it's the fact that I want to rackmount my gear, but $1,799.00 is
>>> the cheapest option offered on pfSense.org that can rackmount.
>>>
>> You seem to have added $1000 without justification:
>>
>> https://store.pfsense.org/SG-4860-1U/
>>
>
> Perhaps someone should put that on the https://pfsense.org/ website?
>
> I started at https://pfsense.org/, then clicked on Products, which took
> me to https://pfsense.org/products/ which only offers
> https://store.pfsense.org/XG-2758/ when I was looking for a new product a
> couple weeks ago. It didn't occur to me you would have multiple incomplete
> lists of products, so I ordered hardware elsewhere already. Shame, I'd
> rather have supported pfSense, but it's too late now.
>
> --
> Dave Warren
> http://www.hireahit.com/
> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren
>
>
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold