Re: [WSG] In the 'Wow, if only everyone did this category...
...morphs to this, seamlessly, on resize... http://www.omnivision.com.au/safari/resize.png ...and to this, even if you get carried away. http://www.omnivision.com.au/safari/extreme.png N Gday Nick, I am getting a 404 on the resize.png? Kat *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] In the 'Wow, if only everyone did this category...
Kat wrote: http://www.omnivision.com.au/safari/resize.png http://www.omnivision.com.au/safari/extreme.png N Gday Nick, I am getting a 404 on the resize.png? Kat Unh. Try these: http://www.omnivision.com.au/safari/resized.htm http://www.omnivision.com.au/safari/extreme.htm Apologies. N ___ Omnivision. Websight. http://www.omnivision.com.au/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] In the 'Wow, if only everyone did this category...
Actually, the reason that you can't see the text in any other browser is due to the use of a drop shadow - something else that only Safari and its siblings renders. Mike -Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Faulds Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 1:01 AM The reason you can't see anything is because the text is set to white - with a bg-image, you'd be able to see it. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] swift - only windows browser with a webkit?
Hi, I got this idea from the 'Wow, if only everyone did this' conversation. Swift seems to be the only Windows browser with a webkit, making it an idea to test websites for mac-compatibility if you don't have a mac. But any link I found so far to download this new, open source web browser leeds to www.getswift.org which refuses the connection. Does anyone know where to get swift? Thanx, Daniela *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] swift - only windows browser with a webkit?
On 06/10/10 11:30 (GMT+0200) [EMAIL PROTECTED] apparently typed: I got this idea from the 'Wow, if only everyone did this' conversation. Swift seems to be the only Windows browser with a webkit, making it an idea to test websites for mac-compatibility if you don't have a mac. But any link I found so far to download this new, open source web browser leeds to www.getswift.org which refuses the connection. Does anyone know where to get swift? I was able to download from http://getswiftfox.com/ , but not get it installed, and found the help forum of no value in trying. -- The Lord is my strength and my shield; my heart trusts in him, and I am helped. Psalm 28:7 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] Safari and bg-images for list bullets
I have a couple of problems with Safari which can be seen on this page: http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/examples/test.html The first is the misalignment of the bg-images that I'm using for bullets. Every other browser including IE5 displays them how I want them except for Safari. I did a quick search but the only thing I came up with was that this was a bug that only affected earlier versions but it seems to be the same in Safari 2.0 too. So, is there a solution? Does it require using a Safari-only filter? Which brings me on to the next problem which is illustrated by the search box. Most browsers displayed it how I wanted, but I had to use a filter to give Opera 8.5 a different height (Opera 9 is OK). It seems like Safari has the same problem, so again, do I need to add a filter for Safari, or is there a better way to do this without resorting to any filters/hacks? Cheers John -- Tyssen Design www.tyssendesign.com.au Ph: (07) 3300 3303 Mb: 0405 678 590 *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] swift - only windows browser with a webkit?
Felix Miata wrote: On 06/10/10 11:30 (GMT+0200) [EMAIL PROTECTED] apparently typed: I got this idea from the 'Wow, if only everyone did this' conversation. Swift seems to be the only Windows browser with a webkit, making it an idea to test websites for mac-compatibility if you don't have a mac. But any link I found so far to download this new, open source web browser leeds to www.getswift.org which refuses the connection. Does anyone know where to get swift? The page in Google's cache currently leads to a page with the following message: | I'm taking a break from Swift. Right now I haven't got the | time nor cash to finish this project. I want to open it up | again, and release my 0.2 version and keep developing, but | right now (as i'm in the middle of setting up the new server) | don't have the time needed. I get paid jack for this. | I have spent $350 out of my own pocket on this. I have | recieved $130 in ad revenue. Big difference. Please keep | checking in, I will have a release within a week or 2. http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.getwebkit.org So, it seems the project may be returning in the future. But given that the site is now completely dead, who knows?! I was able to download from http://getswiftfox.com/ , but not get it installed, and found the help forum of no value in trying. No, that's a completely different browser. That one is based upon Gecko (Firefox). Swift is based upon WebKit, which is the same rendering engine used by Safari. I have the Swift_0.1.msi installer if anyone wants it. It's got a terrible user interface, but it will at least render the pages reasonably well. Compare for yourself: http://lachy.id.au/lib/images/2006/swift-multibg-image-20061010 http://lachy.id.au/lib/images/2006/safari-multibg-image-20061010 -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] swift - only windows browser with a webkit?
That would appear to be a completely different beast, despite the similarity of name. When I tried the Safari-based Swift a month or so ago, I was able to install it okay, but there seemed to be no way to configure a proxy, which made it completely useless. Mike -Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Felix Miata I was able to download from http://getswiftfox.com/ , but not get it installed, and found the help forum of no value in trying. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Safari and bg-images for list bullets
On 10/10/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a couple of problems with Safari which can be seen on this page:http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/examples/test.htmlSo, is there a solution? Does it require using a Safari-only filter? I ran into the same problem not long ago, and solved by simply altering the image itself - to have more whitespace between the two states (hover and not-hover). Using a gif it won't make the image file any (noticeably) larger. It's not an ideal solution, but it's a means to an end. ~eys ***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]***
RE: Re: [WSG] swift - only windows browser with a webkit?
Felix, I would like a copy of the msi. Matthew Vanderhorst www.montgomeryohio.org Felix Miata wrote: On 06/10/10 11:30 (GMT+0200) [EMAIL PROTECTED] apparently typed: I got this idea from the 'Wow, if only everyone did this' conversation. Swift seems to be the only Windows browser with a webkit, making it an idea to test websites for mac-compatibility if you don't have a mac. But any link I found so far to download this new, open source web browser leeds to www.getswift.org which refuses the connection. Does anyone know where to get swift? The page in Google's cache currently leads to a page with the following message: | I'm taking a break from Swift. Right now I haven't got the | time nor cash to finish this project. I want to open it up | again, and release my 0.2 version and keep developing, but | right now (as i'm in the middle of setting up the new server) | don't have the time needed. I get paid jack for this. | I have spent $350 out of my own pocket on this. I have | recieved $130 in ad revenue. Big difference. Please keep | checking in, I will have a release within a week or 2. http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.getwebkit.org So, it seems the project may be returning in the future. But given that the site is now completely dead, who knows?! I was able to download from http://getswiftfox.com/ , but not get it installed, and found the help forum of no value in trying. No, that's a completely different browser. That one is based upon Gecko (Firefox). Swift is based upon WebKit, which is the same rendering engine used by Safari. I have the Swift_0.1.msi installer if anyone wants it. It's got a terrible user interface, but it will at least render the pages reasonably well. Compare for yourself: http://lachy.id.au/lib/images/2006/swift-multibg-image-20061010 http://lachy.id.au/lib/images/2006/safari-multibg-image-20061010 -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** -- Matthew Vanderhorst *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Safari and bg-images for list bullets
I've already done that though. The space between the two states is about 5 times the height of the actual bullet. In Safari you can actually seem the on state appearing above the off state even though it's about 40px below it in the image file and bg-repeat is set to no-repeat. On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:11:20 +1000, Eystein Alnaes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/10/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a couple of problems with Safari which can be seen on this page: http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/examples/test.html So, is there a solution? Does it require using a Safari-only filter? I ran into the same problem not long ago, and solved by simply altering the image itself - to have more whitespace between the two states (hover and not-hover). Using a gif it won't make the image file any (noticeably) larger. It's not an ideal solution, but it's a means to an end. ~eys *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** -- Tyssen Design www.tyssendesign.com.au Ph: (07) 3300 3303 Mb: 0405 678 590 *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Safari and bg-images for list bullets
On 10/10/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a couple of problems with Safari which can be seen on this page: http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/examples/test.html So, is there a solution? Does it require using a Safari-only filter? I ran into the same problem not long ago, and solved by simply altering the image itself - to have more whitespace between the two states (hover and not-hover). Using a gif it won't make the image file any (noticeably) larger. It's not an ideal solution, but it's a means to an end. I've already done that though. The space between the two states is about 5times the height of the actual bullet. In Safari you can actually seem theon state appearing above the off state even though it's about 40px below it in the image file and bg-repeat is set to no-repeat.I should've remembered, I added whitespace at the top and bottom of the image, and adjusted the background-postition accordingly. In other words, it's still showing the bottom/top in the wrong place, but since you've changed it to the same backgroundcolor (or transparent) it won't show. If anyone knows why the bottom of the bg shows above the top on no-repeat please feel free to enlighten us! ~eys ***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]***
Re: [WSG] Safari and bg-images for list bullets
On Oct 10, 2006, at 6:59 PM, John Faulds wrote: http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/examples/test.html The first is the misalignment of the bg-images that I'm using for bullets. Every other browser including IE5 displays them how I want them except for Safari. I did a quick search but the only thing I came up with was that this was a bug that only affected earlier versions but it seems to be the same in Safari 2.0 too. So, is there a solution? Does it require using a Safari-only filter? It is a known bug with Safari: happens when the background image is too large for the container. part of that bug has been fixed in nightly builds, but the 'hover' problems still is buggy in the latest Webkit build I have. A bug report has been filed ages ago (2years at least in my case), but the engineers there are not overtly concerned, it seems. Workarounds include: let the image move horizontally instead of vertically or vice-versa, use an oversized image with loads of white space, use different image for the various states... Here is a page of mines that tested this (created in June 2004, according to my notes). http://dev.l-c-n.com/Safari/background-hover.php Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh http://emps.l-c-n.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Getting the layout to work and with all browsers
I suppose after a week I should assume no replies = nothing forthcoming? Ta folks! Dave Cameron *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] swift - only windows browser with a webkit?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: I have the Swift_0.1.msi installer if anyone wants it. Felix, I would like a copy of the msi. It was I, not Felix, who has it. I received a couple of requests for it, so I put it up online. http://lachy.id.au/dev/swift/binaries/ -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Getting the layout to work and with all browsers
Copy and paste ;) Hi there. I'm looking to adopt a drop-down menu theme on my site. I've got most of it sorted, but there's still a few teething problems. If you look at www.camieabz.co.uk for an example of the existing navigation tabs first (no drop-down). The testsite link is www.camieabz.co.uk/menutest/index.html The pertinent CSS file is www.camieabz.co.uk/menutest/menustyle.css and is solely for the menu section of the styling. There may be bits and pieces in the other style sheet which need to come out. Problems: Opera / Firefox menu bar sits higher that drop-down menu, making navigation impossible. Original site tabs have an image which forms the left border of the tabs. On the new version, they don't show. Also there should be a small black arrow image on menu items 1.5 and 5.5 to indicate another sub level menu. No show either. Those are the important ones. The only other I can think of is that the original site tab colours are preferred, but the new ones are different. Appreciate any help, as the template I'm using has (for me at least) slightly more complicated selectors than usual. Many thanks! Dave Cameron. From: ~davidLaakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Getting the layout to work and with all browsers Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:24:11 -0400 David Cameron wrote: I suppose after a week I should assume no replies = nothing forthcoming? Dave Cameron I no longer have your post, nor am I able to find it in the archives (not that I could answer the question, even if I could find it :-) ). You may want to post again with a link to the page in question-- if there is one. Regards, ~dL -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] can i access any element in a nested form
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 07:09:34PM +0530, nishak wrote: Can I access any element, Define access. Match with a CSS selector? which is there inside a nested form tag? Nested suggests form form /form /form, which is forbidden. I tried but I guess there is some syntactical problem, What did you try? Show us the code. it's saying there is no property for form. What is it? Can u pl Can you avoid butching the language like that, please? -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] -moz-border-bottom-colors. Help
On 10/10/06, Tee G. Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wanted to use -moz-border-bottom-colors just for this tab, it doesn't seem working with this line of code -moz-border-bottom-colors: 1px solid #000; Width and style aren't valid values for border-color or -moz-border-bottom-color or this -moz-border-bottom-colors: #000; Did you supply a width and style for that? border-bottom-width:3px; border-bottom-style:solid; -moz-border-bottom-colors:#f0f #555 #c00; According to http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/ Creating_a_Skin_for_Mozilla:In-Depth#-moz-border-bottom-colors -moz-border-bottom-colors: ThreeDDarkShadow ThreeDShadow transparent; I must confess I do not quite understand ThreeDDarkShadow ThreeDShadow . ThreeDShadow and ThreeDShadow is part of the system-colours in css2. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/ui.html#system-colors *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Getting the layout to work and with all browsers
David Cameron wrote: Problems: Opera / Firefox menu bar sits higher that drop-down menu, making navigation impossible. do you think that enclosing the drop down in a table has anything to do with the positioning? dwain *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] can i access any element in a nested form
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:49:10PM +0100, David Dorward wrote: Can you avoid butching the language like that, please? ... OK, the irony of misspelling butchering in that context is not lost on me. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Getting the layout to work and with all browsers
David Cameron wrote:
Problems:
Opera / Firefox menu bar sits higher that drop-down menu, making
navigation impossible.
here's your problem:
.menu ul li
{
float:left;
position:relative;
list-style-type: none;
padding-left:0px;
font-size: 93%;
display:inline;
margin:0;
padding:0;
font-size: 100%;
/*line-height: 1em*/;
the line-height was killing you. take it out and you can navigate.
dwain
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Re: [WSG] can i access any element in a nested form
nishak wrote: Can I access any element, which is there inside a nested form tag? Using JavaScript? If it is present in the DOM, you can access it. I tried but I guess there is some syntactical problem, it's saying there is no property for form. Hmm... My powers of telepathy seem to be failing this evening. I can't seem to see the code you are thinking about, let alone find the errors in it. If I have to guess, I'd say check line 42. ;-) -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Getting the layout to work and with all browsers
David Cameron wrote: The pertinent CSS file is www.camieabz.co.uk/menutest/menustyle.css and is solely for the menu section of the styling. There may be bits and pieces in the other style sheet which need to come out. There's bits and pieces in this one which need to come out, too. For instance, there are multiple, conflicting instances of padding declared in a number of rules. Keeping your css clean makes it much easier to debug. N ___ Omnivision. Websight. http://www.omnivision.com.au/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] swift - only windows browser with a webkit?
On 10/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I got this idea from the 'Wow, if only everyone did this' conversation. Swift seems to be the only Windows browser with a webkit, making it an idea to test websites for mac-compatibility if you don't have a mac. But any link I found so far to download this new, open source web browser leeds to www.getswift.org which refuses the connection. Does anyone know where to get swift? An alternative for you Windows folks -- Webkit was based on and is still a close cousin of KHTML, the rendering engine in KDE's Konqueror. Lots of Linux live CDs will let you run Konqueror from a CD. Knoppix comes to mind (and it's handy to have a copy of that anyway for performing surgery on Windows) but any of them that run Konqueror will allow you to test how your pages render in a KHTML-based browser. HTH -- Philip http://NikitaTheSpider.com/ Whole-site HTML validation, link checking and more *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] *Pure* CSS drop down menu
Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] *Pure* CSS drop down menu document: wasDennis Lapcewich/R6/USDAFS received by: at:10/10/2006 08:59:59 *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] swift - only windows browser with a webkit?
Hi folks,Lachlan wrote:It's got a terrible user interface...Would also be nice if the Tools menu actually worked (I click, nothing happens).One site I tested got rendered without styles but the same site looks just fine with BrowsrCamp.com.Interesting.lib. ***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]***
Re: [WSG] swift - only windows browser with a webkit?
On 10/10/06, libwebdev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, Lachlan wrote: It's got a terrible user interface... Would also be nice if the Tools menu actually worked (I click, nothing happens). One site I tested got rendered without styles but the same site looks just fine with BrowsrCamp.com. Interesting. I had some problems with Swift and had to uninstall it. I think it had to do with the face that it's just too young and buggy right now. The live CD option sounds a lot better. -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... portfolio.christianmontoya.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Getting the layout to work and with all browsers
Right. Decided to solve it all a better way (I think).
I've installed IE7, Firefox and Opera and will redesign to meet their
requirements. IE versions prior to 7 get second place now.
Thanks though. I changed things as you said, but I saw how it reacted with
Opera and decided it needed severe attention. Back to the drawing board.
Dave Cameron.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Getting the layout to work and with all browsers
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:16:04 -0500
David Cameron wrote:
Problems:
Opera / Firefox menu bar sits higher that drop-down menu, making
navigation impossible.
here's your problem:
.menu ul li
{
float:left;
position:relative;
list-style-type: none;
padding-left:0px;
font-size: 93%;
display:inline;
margin:0;
padding:0;
font-size: 100%;
/*line-height: 1em*/;
the line-height was killing you. take it out and you can navigate.
dwain
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Re: [WSG] Safari and bg-images for list bullets
use an oversized image with loads of white space I ended up doing this as per the example in your link with the extra white space below (as well as in between) and now it's fine. Thanks. Any ideas on the height of the input problem? -- Tyssen Design Web print design services www.tyssendesign.com.au Ph: (07) 3300 3303 Mb: 0405 678 590 *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
