RE: [WSG] Site Check - amplify.com.au

2007-02-12 Thread Gav....
Nice site,

 

You never asked I know but .

 

There's a few '&' in the code instead of '&'

 

There some hacks causing your CSS to be invalid that I think anyway are not
necessary.

 

That 'Strategy' Volume graphic is just asking to be pressed, couldn't you be
different and style

Your Navigation around that graphic.

 

Gav.

 

  _  

From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Scott Swabey
Sent: Monday, 12 February 2007 7:33 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Site Check - amplify.com.au

 

Hi all

We have just completed a redesign/redevelopment of the www.amplify.com.au
website, and would appreciate any feedback, especially from Mac users.

 



Many thanks

-- 
Scott Swabey
www.lafinboy.com
www.thought-after.com 
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: [WSG] Standards War - HTML 5 vs XHTML 2.0

2007-02-12 Thread Gav....


> -Original Message-
> From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Lachlan Hunt
> Sent: Monday, 12 February 2007 8:37 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Standards War - HTML 5 vs XHTML 2.0
> 
> Paul Ross wrote:
> > I was there at the WSG Sydney meeting last Thursday and was very
> > interested to hear Lachlan Hunt ("the tallest WSG member" according
> > to Russ) talking about the "Future of HTML".
> 
> Thanks, I'm glad you liked it. :-)
> 
> > Lachlan's talk raised a lot of questions (which I wished I'd asked at
> > the meeting but felt like a noob at the time).
> 
> HTML 5 was new to most people at the meeting, there's no need to feel
> like a noob when everyone else around is too. :-)
> 
> > Is this a fork in the specs road or a "standards war" in the making?
> 
> No, I wouldn't call it a standards war, the major browser vendors have
> already unanimously decided what they will be implementing.  It is a
> minor fork in the road, but it's not a big issue since the other
> alternative is a dead end.  XHTML 2.0 is effectively dead and is
> relatively safe to ignore.  HTML 5 is the most relevant spec.  In many
> ways, it's already far more relevant than HTML 4.01.
> 
> There are numerous, significant problems with XHTML 2.0, which make it
> extremely difficult, if not impossible, to implement interoperably in
> the real world.  Although, we recognise the fact that there are some
> features in XHTML 2 that people like, and many of them have already been
> incorporated in, or being considered for, HTML5.

Hi Lachlan, Over at Apache Forrest, our next version of the Web Publishing 
Framework is to be based around XHTML 2.0. 

For this reason alone, I would like to quote to the members your message
Above. Can I do that ? If yes would you rather it be to a public or
Private list.

Thanks.

Gav...

> 
> If anyone is interested in learning more about, or getting involved
> with, HTML5, there are several things that you can do.  Read the blog,
> FAQ or wiki; ask questions in the forum, #whatwg on IRC or the new
> whatwg help mailing list; or read the specs and contribute to the main
> mailing list.  More information about these is available from the WHATWG
> home page.
> 
> http://whatwg.org/
> 
> --
> Lachlan Hunt
> http://lachy.id.au/
> 
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.411 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 2/10/2007



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Accessibility - display: none v.s. left: -9999px

2007-02-12 Thread Gav....


> -Original Message-
> From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Blake
> Sent: Monday, 12 February 2007 5:20 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: [WSG] Accessibility - display: none v.s. left: -px
> 
> Which is more accessible to screen readers and the like?
> 
> display: none;
> 
> or
> 
> position: absolute;
> left: -px;
> 
> I think I've read that screen readers will read content that is
> positioned off-screen, but will not read content that is set to
> display: none.

Yep, correct on both counts.

Gav...

> 
> --
> Australian Web Designer - http://www.blakehaswell.com/
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.411 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 2/10/2007



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] HTTP compression in Apache

2007-02-08 Thread Gav....
No idea what this has to do with Web Standards, but anyway ...

> -Original Message-
> From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Nisha Kumari
> Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2007 6:16 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: [WSG] HTTP compression in Apache
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I am trying to implement HTTP compression in Apache.  Have included
> following code in my httpd.conf file
> 
> 
>   SetOutputFilter Deflate
> 
> 
> 
>   Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Includes
>   AllowOverride None
> 
>   Order allow,deny
>   Allow from all
> 
>   AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/plain text/xml
> 
> 
> But I am getting error in my apache error.log file saying " [Thu Feb 08
> 14:38:04 2007] [error] an unknown filter was not added: deflate".
> 
> If anybody has done this please let me know if I need to do any thing
> more or if m I doing any thing wrong here.

I'm pretty sure the Deflate you have needs capitalising also.

SetOutputFilter DEFLATE

Also, AddOutputFilterByType is deprecated in Apache 2.1.

Try just AddOutputFilter instead if it will serve your needs.

Apache Docs are your friend :
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#addoutputfilterbytype

Best not ask any more Apache questions here I would have thought.

Gav...
> 
> Regards,
> Nisha.
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.411 / Virus Database: 268.17.30/674 - Release Date: 2/7/2007



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] XML driven websites

2007-01-06 Thread Gav....
Relevant to the thread but not this message exactly - 

Apache Forrest (forrest.apache.org) is an XML Publishing Framework. Converts
XDoc to (X)HTML. Worth a look for those considering using XML as a base
Document format.

Gav...

> -Original Message-
> From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Juergen Auer
> Sent: Friday, 5 January 2007 11:14 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] XML driven websites
> 
> On 5 Jan 2007 at 13:44, David Dorward wrote:
> > Client side XSLT isn't (generally) a great idea though. You do want
> > search engines to be able to read the menu, don't you?
> 
> All search engines and most of the browsers (all instead of IE6) get
> the Html-Version. The Xml-Version is blocked by the robots.txt. Users
> with the IE6 and activated JavaScript are redirected to the Xml-
> Version. Other can use the link at the page
> 
> Xml-Praxis: Diese Website
> 
> there is a german description.
> 
> The Domain exists since 2003 in these two versions, only my Unicode-
> Database is plain XHtml (no Xml-Version). And I have enough of google-
> traffic, this may not be visible using google.com.
> 
> Its easier to manage the complete domain, its like a small content
> management system.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Juergen Auer
> 
> 
> Jürgen Auer
> http://www.sql-und-xml.de/
> Web-Datenbanken zum Mieten
> Friedenstr. 37, 10 249 Berlin
> Tel.: +49 (0)30 / 420 200 60
> Fax: +49 (0)30 / 420 198 19
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.5/616 - Release Date: 1/4/2007



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] list-style: decimal

2006-10-31 Thread Gav....
Hi,


> -Original Message-
> From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Tee G. Peng
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 November 2006 7:26 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] list-style: decimal
> 
> 
> On Oct 31, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Tee G. Peng wrote:
> 
> >>
> >> Unless I'm missing something, if you want a numbered list 1-15,
> >> just use
> >> ordered list element: ol
> >>
> >> 
> >>   List item one
> >>   List item two
> >>[...]
> >>   List item fourteen
> >>   List item fifteen
> >> 
> >>
> 
> Hmmm, OL gives a 25 pixel default space between number and the
> content. There isn't seemed a way to override it, this is really
> undesirable.

Try using 'list-style:inside' maybe that cures it for you.

Gav...

> 
> tee
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.21/509 - Release Date:
> 10/31/2006




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] list-style: decimal

2006-10-31 Thread Gav....
Hi,

> -Original Message-
> From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Tee G. Peng
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 November 2006 6:34 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: [WSG] list-style: decimal
> 
> Hi, I try to use 'list-style: decimal' for the first time.

What difference does it make if you used

'list-style-type: decimal' 

Instead.


> 
>   The list has some 15 items, at tenth, it goes with '0' and the
> following items start from 1, 2, 3... again.
> 
> The W3C CSS 2 spec about list style for decimal is vague.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/generate.html#lists
> 
> decimal - Decimal numbers, beginning with 1.
> 
> Except from adding the numbers, any other way I can do?

Try the alternative 'list-style-type: decimal-leading-zero'

Gav...

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> tee
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.21/509 - Release Date:
> 10/31/2006




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Html Question Please Help

2006-08-23 Thread Gav...


> Hi.
> developing a disability links information site.
> got my main country page, say Australia.
> got my disability pages in a folder called MarvinsWebsite, and now the
> main
> pages for the main page, are just under the root directory.
> i created a folder called MarvinsWebfiles, and put two other folders
> called
> Images and WebPages.
> now there is a link to link back to the main page.
> when i move the main files from the root to the two folder, when i try to
> link back to the main page, says it cannot find it, but when i put them
> back
> to the root folder, it works.

So it sounds like the link href path you are trying is wrong.

> now how do i fix this, and the code i have is:
>
>
>   target="content" accesskey="W">Return To Marvins Web Portal Page 
> as a sample.
> cannot upload my site, as my college will not allow ftp uploading.
> and cannot install java and the java acess bridge to use the bravehost
> upload file utility.
> now, how do i fix this problem?
> let me know asap.
> cheers Marvin.

Thats the trouble with dotdots, move some files around and you need to
change the depth of relatvity to the file(s).

Personally in your case I would use the relative from root method.

To link to an index.html page that is in root, all files however deeply
nested need only use 

To link to index.html that has been moved to /marvinswebfiles/ then use


Can not totally understand your folder convension as you have described it
so maybe a touch of ascii art would help describe it.

Anyway, try the above method.

Gav...
>
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>


-- 
Gav...




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***