Re: [WSG] [WSG CMS] Etomite CMS
Well I have tried most of the WYSIWYG editors (open source and commercial) and have settled on http://www.innovastudio.com/This one was simply the easiest to use, and whilst its commercial, by far the least expensive. Works great for FF and IE, and most importantly you can create XHTML compliant pages. Mind you if you use it in a CMS, you cant stop the end user from just messing it up.Other favourites FCK Editor ( http://www.fckeditor.net/), and Xinha (http://xinha.python-hosting.com/) although the latter is not fully developed yet.Hope that helps :) **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
Re: [WSG] [WSG CMS] Etomite CMS
Ryan Moore wrote: Hopefully this is not off-topic, It is. Go to the WSG site and subscribe to the CMS list. This was discussed - and moved over to that list - just a few days ago! C'mon, people. Too many posts recently have been OT, or simple thanks messages which would be better sent directly to their intended recipients. Can we cut some of this noise, please? It's very frustrating. but every CMS in my belief she be equipped with a powerful WYSIWYG editor. What is the preferred editor some may use in their cms' that keep things standard. I'd be interested in an editor that will validate XHTML strict. Ryan snip Thx - Nick ___ Omnivision. Websight. http://www.omnivision.com.au/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] [WSG CMS] Etomite CMS
On 6/5/06 11:15 PM Stephen Neate [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: Hope that helps :) Even while this discussion moves off to the CMS list, could everyone please post text-only format to this list please? I can't read all that tiny type and I just have to delete those posts! Please cooperate! Thanks :-) Rick ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] [WSG CMS] Etomite CMS
On Jun 5, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Nick Gleitzman wrote: Ryan Moore wrote: Hopefully this is not off-topic, It is. Go to the WSG site and subscribe to the CMS list. This was discussed - and moved over to that list - just a few days ago! C'mon, people. Too many posts recently have been OT, or simple thanks messages which would be better sent directly to their intended recipients. Can we cut some of this noise, please? It's very frustrating. Nick, I think you are the one who got confused. I am the author of the original post and I SENT it to CMS at webstandardsgroup.org. As far as I am aware, the thread stays in CMS at all time. Or perhaps you were saying I started a off-topic thread (that is about CMS) to CMS list?! Regards, tee ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] [WSG CMS] Etomite CMS
Tee G Peng said I would like to hear from those who have plenty of CMSs experiences or who are CMS developers, how do you think of Etomite CMS. You should go with what works for you. drupal.org works for me. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] [WSG CMS] Etomite CMS
Hopefully this is not off-topic, but every CMS in my belief she be equipped with a powerful WYSIWYG editor. What is the preferred editor some may use in their cms' that keep things standard. I'd be interested in an editor that will validate XHTML strict. Ryan -Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sime Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 11:44 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] [WSG CMS] Etomite CMS Tee G Peng said I would like to hear from those who have plenty of CMSs experiences or who are CMS developers, how do you think of Etomite CMS. You should go with what works for you. drupal.org works for me. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **