[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] release/21.x: [clang-format] Fix a crash on BAS_BlockIndent (#164047) (PR #164126)
https://github.com/owenca milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164126 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [LoongArch] Add patterns to support vector type average instructions generation (PR #161079)
tangaac wrote: We could make these `ISD` legal. ```bash AVGFLOORS -> avg AVGFLOORU -> avg.u AVGCEILS -> avgr AVGCEILU -> avgr.u ``` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161079 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] release/21.x: [libc++] Implement comparison operators for `tuple` added in C++23 (#148799) (PR #151808)
https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151808 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] 2b5c693 - Revert "[clang] separate recursive instantiation check from CodeSynthesisCont…"
Author: Matheus Izvekov
Date: 2025-10-19T16:19:06-03:00
New Revision: 2b5c693610d5e52663e534ab7af9d30fdac3c2e0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2b5c693610d5e52663e534ab7af9d30fdac3c2e0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2b5c693610d5e52663e534ab7af9d30fdac3c2e0.diff
LOG: Revert "[clang] separate recursive instantiation check from
CodeSynthesisCont…"
This reverts commit fd073a3fbaf0b05fae61cca5def80ce0adaeadb3.
Added:
Modified:
clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h
clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
clang/test/SemaCXX/libstdcxx_pair_swap_hack.cpp
clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-self.cpp
Removed:
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h b/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h
index cb21335ede075..add4c1596ab86 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h
@@ -13007,37 +13007,6 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
/// default arguments of its methods have been parsed.
UnparsedDefaultArgInstantiationsMap UnparsedDefaultArgInstantiations;
- using InstantiatingSpecializationsKey = llvm::PointerIntPair;
-
- struct RecursiveInstGuard {
-enum class Kind {
- Template,
- DefaultArgument,
- ExceptionSpec,
-};
-
-RecursiveInstGuard(Sema &S, Decl *D, Kind Kind)
-: S(S), Key(D->getCanonicalDecl(), unsigned(Kind)) {
- auto [_, Created] = S.InstantiatingSpecializations.insert(Key);
- if (!Created)
-Key = {};
-}
-
-~RecursiveInstGuard() {
- if (Key.getOpaqueValue()) {
-[[maybe_unused]] bool Erased =
-S.InstantiatingSpecializations.erase(Key);
-assert(Erased);
- }
-}
-
-operator bool() const { return Key.getOpaqueValue() == nullptr; }
-
- private:
-Sema &S;
-Sema::InstantiatingSpecializationsKey Key;
- };
-
/// A context in which code is being synthesized (where a source location
/// alone is not sufficient to identify the context). This covers template
/// instantiation and various forms of implicitly-generated functions.
@@ -13399,9 +13368,14 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
/// recursive template instantiations.
bool isInvalid() const { return Invalid; }
+/// Determine whether we are already instantiating this
+/// specialization in some surrounding active instantiation.
+bool isAlreadyInstantiating() const { return AlreadyInstantiating; }
+
private:
Sema &SemaRef;
bool Invalid;
+bool AlreadyInstantiating;
InstantiatingTemplate(Sema &SemaRef,
CodeSynthesisContext::SynthesisKind Kind,
@@ -13531,7 +13505,7 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
SmallVector CodeSynthesisContexts;
/// Specializations whose definitions are currently being instantiated.
- llvm::DenseSet InstantiatingSpecializations;
+ llvm::DenseSet> InstantiatingSpecializations;
/// Non-dependent types used in templates that have already been instantiated
/// by some template instantiation.
@@ -13806,14 +13780,6 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
const MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList &TemplateArgs,
TemplateSpecializationKind TSK, bool Complain = true);
-private:
- bool InstantiateClassImpl(SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation,
-CXXRecordDecl *Instantiation,
-CXXRecordDecl *Pattern,
-const MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList &TemplateArgs,
-TemplateSpecializationKind TSK, bool Complain);
-
-public:
/// Instantiate the definition of an enum from a given pattern.
///
/// \param PointOfInstantiation The point of instantiation within the
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
index 7f858050db13e..038f39633760d 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
@@ -639,8 +639,15 @@ Sema::InstantiatingTemplate::InstantiatingTemplate(
}
Invalid = SemaRef.pushCodeSynthesisContext(Inst);
- if (!Invalid)
+ if (!Invalid) {
+AlreadyInstantiating =
+!Inst.Entity
+? false
+: !SemaRef.InstantiatingSpecializations
+ .insert({Inst.Entity->getCanonicalDecl(), Inst.Kind})
+ .second;
atTemplateBegin(SemaRef.TemplateInstCallbacks, SemaRef, Inst);
+ }
}
Sema::InstantiatingTemplate::InstantiatingTemplate(
@@ -895,6 +902,13 @@ void Sema::popCodeSynthesisContext() {
void Sema::InstantiatingTemplate::Clear() {
if (!Invalid) {
+if (!AlreadyInstantiating) {
+ auto &Active = SemaRef.CodeSynthesisContexts.back();
+ if (Active.Entity)
+SemaRef.InstantiatingSpecializations.erase(
+{Active.Entity->getCa
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] RuntimeLibcalls: Make sure _Unwind_Resume entries are mutually exclusive (PR #164195)
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195
None
>From 69a5b22cd1e47f53bbc779a6cb87ed94c55e39bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 01:13:16 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] RuntimeLibcalls: Make sure _Unwind_Resume entries are
mutually exclusive
---
llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
index e853f427d532a..243b864ccf033 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
@@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ def ExceptionModelIsNotNone : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
[{ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::None}]
>;
+def ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
+ [{ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::None &&
+ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::SjLj}]
+>;
+
def ExceptionModelIsSjLj : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
[{ExceptionModel == ExceptionHandling::SjLj}]
>;
@@ -1153,8 +1158,10 @@ def __ssp_canary_word :
RuntimeLibcallImpl;
//===--===//
defvar ExceptionModelCalls = (add
- LibcallImpls<(add DefaultExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
+ LibcallImpls<(add __cxa_end_cleanup),
ExceptionModelIsNotNone>,
+ LibcallImpls<(add _Unwind_Resume),
+ ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume>,
LibcallImpls<(add SjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
ExceptionModelIsSjLj>
);
@@ -1396,8 +1403,10 @@ defset list
WinArm64ECSjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls = {
}
defvar ExceptionModelCallsArm64EC = (add
- LibcallImpls<(add WinArm64ECDefaultExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
+ LibcallImpls<(add arm64ec___cxa_end_cleanup),
ExceptionModelIsNotNone>,
+ LibcallImpls<(add arm64ec__Unwind_Resume),
+ ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume>,
LibcallImpls<(add WinArm64ECSjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
ExceptionModelIsSjLj>
);
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] RuntimeLibcalls: Make sure _Unwind_Resume entries are mutually exclusive (PR #164195)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td (+11-2)
``diff
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
index e853f427d532a..243b864ccf033 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
@@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ def ExceptionModelIsNotNone : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
[{ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::None}]
>;
+def ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
+ [{ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::None &&
+ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::SjLj}]
+>;
+
def ExceptionModelIsSjLj : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
[{ExceptionModel == ExceptionHandling::SjLj}]
>;
@@ -1153,8 +1158,10 @@ def __ssp_canary_word :
RuntimeLibcallImpl;
//===--===//
defvar ExceptionModelCalls = (add
- LibcallImpls<(add DefaultExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
+ LibcallImpls<(add __cxa_end_cleanup),
ExceptionModelIsNotNone>,
+ LibcallImpls<(add _Unwind_Resume),
+ ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume>,
LibcallImpls<(add SjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
ExceptionModelIsSjLj>
);
@@ -1396,8 +1403,10 @@ defset list
WinArm64ECSjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls = {
}
defvar ExceptionModelCallsArm64EC = (add
- LibcallImpls<(add WinArm64ECDefaultExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
+ LibcallImpls<(add arm64ec___cxa_end_cleanup),
ExceptionModelIsNotNone>,
+ LibcallImpls<(add arm64ec__Unwind_Resume),
+ ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume>,
LibcallImpls<(add WinArm64ECSjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
ExceptionModelIsSjLj>
);
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] RuntimeLibcalls: Make sure _Unwind_Resume entries are mutually exclusive (PR #164195)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-arm
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td (+11-2)
``diff
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
index e853f427d532a..243b864ccf033 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
@@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ def ExceptionModelIsNotNone : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
[{ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::None}]
>;
+def ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
+ [{ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::None &&
+ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::SjLj}]
+>;
+
def ExceptionModelIsSjLj : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
[{ExceptionModel == ExceptionHandling::SjLj}]
>;
@@ -1153,8 +1158,10 @@ def __ssp_canary_word :
RuntimeLibcallImpl;
//===--===//
defvar ExceptionModelCalls = (add
- LibcallImpls<(add DefaultExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
+ LibcallImpls<(add __cxa_end_cleanup),
ExceptionModelIsNotNone>,
+ LibcallImpls<(add _Unwind_Resume),
+ ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume>,
LibcallImpls<(add SjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
ExceptionModelIsSjLj>
);
@@ -1396,8 +1403,10 @@ defset list
WinArm64ECSjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls = {
}
defvar ExceptionModelCallsArm64EC = (add
- LibcallImpls<(add WinArm64ECDefaultExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
+ LibcallImpls<(add arm64ec___cxa_end_cleanup),
ExceptionModelIsNotNone>,
+ LibcallImpls<(add arm64ec__Unwind_Resume),
+ ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume>,
LibcallImpls<(add WinArm64ECSjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
ExceptionModelIsSjLj>
);
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] RuntimeLibcalls: Make sure _Unwind_Resume entries are mutually exclusive (PR #164195)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td (+11-2)
``diff
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
index e853f427d532a..243b864ccf033 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
@@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ def ExceptionModelIsNotNone : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
[{ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::None}]
>;
+def ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
+ [{ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::None &&
+ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::SjLj}]
+>;
+
def ExceptionModelIsSjLj : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
[{ExceptionModel == ExceptionHandling::SjLj}]
>;
@@ -1153,8 +1158,10 @@ def __ssp_canary_word :
RuntimeLibcallImpl;
//===--===//
defvar ExceptionModelCalls = (add
- LibcallImpls<(add DefaultExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
+ LibcallImpls<(add __cxa_end_cleanup),
ExceptionModelIsNotNone>,
+ LibcallImpls<(add _Unwind_Resume),
+ ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume>,
LibcallImpls<(add SjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
ExceptionModelIsSjLj>
);
@@ -1396,8 +1403,10 @@ defset list
WinArm64ECSjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls = {
}
defvar ExceptionModelCallsArm64EC = (add
- LibcallImpls<(add WinArm64ECDefaultExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
+ LibcallImpls<(add arm64ec___cxa_end_cleanup),
ExceptionModelIsNotNone>,
+ LibcallImpls<(add arm64ec__Unwind_Resume),
+ ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume>,
LibcallImpls<(add WinArm64ECSjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
ExceptionModelIsSjLj>
);
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] RuntimeLibcalls: Make sure _Unwind_Resume entries are mutually exclusive (PR #164195)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td (+11-2)
``diff
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
index e853f427d532a..243b864ccf033 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
@@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ def ExceptionModelIsNotNone : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
[{ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::None}]
>;
+def ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
+ [{ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::None &&
+ExceptionModel != ExceptionHandling::SjLj}]
+>;
+
def ExceptionModelIsSjLj : RuntimeLibcallPredicate<
[{ExceptionModel == ExceptionHandling::SjLj}]
>;
@@ -1153,8 +1158,10 @@ def __ssp_canary_word :
RuntimeLibcallImpl;
//===--===//
defvar ExceptionModelCalls = (add
- LibcallImpls<(add DefaultExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
+ LibcallImpls<(add __cxa_end_cleanup),
ExceptionModelIsNotNone>,
+ LibcallImpls<(add _Unwind_Resume),
+ ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume>,
LibcallImpls<(add SjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
ExceptionModelIsSjLj>
);
@@ -1396,8 +1403,10 @@ defset list
WinArm64ECSjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls = {
}
defvar ExceptionModelCallsArm64EC = (add
- LibcallImpls<(add WinArm64ECDefaultExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
+ LibcallImpls<(add arm64ec___cxa_end_cleanup),
ExceptionModelIsNotNone>,
+ LibcallImpls<(add arm64ec__Unwind_Resume),
+ ExceptionModelHasUnwindResume>,
LibcallImpls<(add WinArm64ECSjLjExceptionHandlingLibcalls),
ExceptionModelIsSjLj>
);
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] RuntimeLibcalls: Make sure _Unwind_Resume entries are mutually exclusive (PR #164195)
arsenm wrote: > [!WARNING] > This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is > open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/164195?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning"; > >on Graphite. > https://graphite.dev/docs/merge-pull-requests";>Learn more * **#164195** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/164195?utm_source=stack-comment-icon"; target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite" width="10px" height="10px"/> 👈 https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/164195?utm_source=stack-comment-view-in-graphite"; target="_blank">(View in Graphite) * **#164133** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/164133?utm_source=stack-comment-icon"; target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite" width="10px" height="10px"/> * **#164044** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/164044?utm_source=stack-comment-icon"; target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite" width="10px" height="10px"/> * `main` This stack of pull requests is managed by https://graphite.dev?utm-source=stack-comment";>Graphite. Learn more about https://stacking.dev/?utm_source=stack-comment";>stacking. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] RuntimeLibcalls: Make sure _Unwind_Resume entries are mutually exclusive (PR #164195)
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164195 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [NFC][llvm-ir2vec] Standardize error message format using WithColor (PR #164032)
https://github.com/mtrofin approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164032 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [NFC][llvm-ir2vec] Standardize error message format using WithColor (PR #164032)
https://github.com/mtrofin edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164032 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [MLGO] Add MIR2Vec embedding framework documentation (PR #164033)
https://github.com/mtrofin approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164033 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [MLGO] Add MIR2Vec embedding framework documentation (PR #164033)
https://github.com/mtrofin edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164033 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [FPEnv][SDAG] Implement FNEARBYINT with optional chain (PR #163081)
spavloff wrote: The use of mandatory chain argument is discussed here: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-change-of-strict-fp-operation-representation-in-ir/85021. Using null chain is an interesting solution, because it allows detecting problems earlier. If we choose mandatory chain, it could be better than using the entry node. > Is this a prerequisite for the IR refactoring you're looking at, or just a > related cleanup? I don't see any obvious connection (as long as there's some > way to translate from LLVM IR to SelectionDAG, it doesn't matter if it > exactly matches). No, this is independent solution for similar problem. > If this optional-chain thing works well, maybe we could also use it for > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/2535. It is very interesting case. Solving that problem probably requires setting memory effects for sdiv/udiv, but DAG definitely has to be fixed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163081 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
