DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34945] ThrowableInformation has dubious Stack Trace extraction feature
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34945 --- Comment #4 from Prasad Gawande gawandepra...@gmail.com 2011-08-25 06:45:12 UTC --- Created attachment 27433 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27433 SimpleERRdcProject -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34945] ThrowableInformation has dubious Stack Trace extraction feature
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34945 Curt Arnold carn...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Curt Arnold carn...@apache.org 2011-08-26 05:02:02 UTC --- Prasad could you file this as new bug. The original bug report was against the long abandoned log4j 1.3 branch and the current log4j 1.2.x code is quite a bit different and I'm not sure how you could be sure that you are reporting on the same bug as the original poster. I took a quick look inside the zip and there is a lot of code, but no apparent explanation of what you observed and how it differed from what you expected. It would be good to know those things, that you are observing the problem log4j 1.2.16 and any platform information (app server, OS, java version) that would allow us to reproduce the problem. Marking the original bug as WONTFIX since it relates to the abandoned log4j 1.3 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34945] ThrowableInformation has dubious Stack Trace extraction feature
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34945 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #3 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 15:09:25 PST --- I think it is fine to have a better stack trace print mechanism, but removing it for pre 1.4 JVM's must go in a later release than 1.2 (as it changes functionality). Could you pleasee provide a test case demonstrating where log4j does not work correctly with your exceptions? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34945] - ThrowableInformation has dubious Stack Trace extraction feature
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34945. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34945 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-14 14:38 --- No patch is attached, so it is hard to review this bug report. If the changes that your suggesting would change behavior of existing applications running under earlier JVM's and would require client's to modify their code, then it can't go into log4j 1.2 or 1.3. Marking bug as NEEDINFO, pending a patch file or more information. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
