[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-557) Create a Replacement/Alternative to RollingFileAppender that works
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901686#comment-15901686 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-557: - Is this not a duplicate of LOG4NET-367? > Create a Replacement/Alternative to RollingFileAppender that works > -- > > Key: LOG4NET-557 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-557 > Project: Log4net > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Appenders >Reporter: Stefan Bodewig > Labels: RollingFileAppender > > The number of bugs raised against {{RollingFileAppender}} is pretty huge and > it is full of bad assumptions. I (Stefan) am convinced that it is impossible > to fix the code as it is, we need a new one. > ANY HELP IS VERY MUCH APPRECIATED. > It doesn't have to mimic the current appender, quite the opposite. Maybe we > should look over to log4j to see how they have structured things, maybe > something completely different is needed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-557) Create a Replacement/Alternative to RollingFileAppender that works
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901154#comment-15901154 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-557: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-427?jql=text%20~%20%22RollingFileAppender%22%20and%20project%20%3D%20Log4net%20and%20status%20%3D%20Open lists 45 issues as of this writing. > Create a Replacement/Alternative to RollingFileAppender that works > -- > > Key: LOG4NET-557 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-557 > Project: Log4net > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Appenders >Reporter: Stefan Bodewig > Labels: RollingFileAppender > > The number of bugs raised against {{RollingFileAppender}} is pretty huge and > it is full of bad assumptions. I (Stefan) am convinced that it is impossible > to fix the code as it is, we need a new one. > ANY HELP IS VERY MUCH APPRECIATED. > It doesn't have to mimic the current appender, quite the opposite. Maybe we > should look over to log4j to see how they have structured things, maybe > something completely different is needed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)