Re: PIMB THC-shirts

2001-01-19 Thread Paul Makepeace

From: "Steve Mynott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> THC isn't water soluble at all which is why you have to dissolve the
> stuff in hot fat before cooking it.

It is soluble, especially in smoke form. Perhaps not *miscible* but certainly
it'll end up in suspension. Not much admittedly, but it is and crucially from
a health angle, more so than tar. If you don't think so, try drinking some
bong water :-)

Paul





Re: PIMB THC-shirts

2001-01-19 Thread Andy Wardley

On Jan 19,  9:39am, Steve Mynott wrote:
> THC isn't water soluble at all which is why you have to dissolve the
> stuff in hot fat before cooking it.

I belive that's true, but according to the paper I just found, presumably
the one Paul was referring to, the paper suggests that some THC *is* lost
when using a bong.

  http://www.ukcia.org/lib/pipes.htm

But note that the paper doesn't offer or claim any scientific evidence to
back this up, merely notes that "This suggests...".  I suspect the goodies
are getting stuck to the bowl, pipe, dirt and tar particles in the water,
but not actually dissolving the water as such.

If I were the kind of person to partake in such affairs, I'd suggest
that some objective testing is required.  But of course, I wouldn't want
to indulge in any activity which our wise and esteemed goverments have
decided is dangerous, immoral and quite sensibly illegal.  Nor would I
want to encourage anyone else to break the law.

Note that I also refrain from drinking tea as it's known to be
a gateway drug, according to the clear evidence that 97.2% of all
heroin addicts drank tea before progressing onto harder substance
abuse.  Be warned people!  Stick with tobacco, alcohol and the other
drugs which have been deemed safe enough for us to be trusted with.


A




-- 
Andy Wardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   Signature regenerating.  Please remain seated.
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   For a good time: http://www.kfs.org/~abw/



Re: PIMB THC-shirts

2001-01-19 Thread Steve Mynott

Redvers Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > Water pipes/bongs are actually worse than joints for avoiding nasty stuff in
> > the smoke: THC is more soluble in the water than tar so you end up reducing
> 
> So do people smoke the stuff (as opposed to consumption) for convenience
> or maybe the familiarity of the ritual of smoking?

Yes and because the effects are faster to notice when smoked and it's
less effort than cooking.

THC isn't water soluble at all which is why you have to dissolve the
stuff in hot fat before cooking it.

The effects are different eaten -- stronger, longer lasting and more
hallucinogenic.  This is either an advantage or disadvantage depending
on your point of view.

-- 
1024/D9C69DF9 steve mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED]

if we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research,
would it?  - albert einstein



Re: PIMB THC-shirts

2001-01-19 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Redvers Davies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Water pipes/bongs are actually worse than joints for avoiding nasty stuff in
> > the smoke: THC is more soluble in the water than tar so you end up reducing
> 
> So do people smoke the stuff (as opposed to consumption) for convenience
> or maybe the familiarity of the ritual of smoking?

IIRC from academic research, if you eat/drink the active ingredient is
absorbed by your liver first and broken down a little so is less effective
that smoking it

others may be able to explain this better

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: PIMB THC-shirts

2001-01-18 Thread Redvers Davies

> Water pipes/bongs are actually worse than joints for avoiding nasty stuff in
> the smoke: THC is more soluble in the water than tar so you end up reducing

So do people smoke the stuff (as opposed to consumption) for convenience
or maybe the familiarity of the ritual of smoking?



Re: PIMB THC-shirts

2001-01-18 Thread Paul Makepeace

From: "Andy Wardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> More effective, yes, because none of the THC is lost to the atmosphere.
> However, it takes an hour or so to notice the effects coming on and
> when they do, there's no way to stop them.  So you might end up ingesting
> twice as much as you planned, which you may (or may not :-) consider
> wasteful if half as much would have had the desired effect.

A friend (*ahem*) lost an entire 24hr period at Glastonbury owing to a
mistakenly consuming a 'teenth spilt between two people on a peanut butter
sandwich.

Water pipes/bongs are actually worse than joints for avoiding nasty stuff in
the smoke: THC is more soluble in the water than tar so you end up reducing
the good:bad ratio. There is a paper somewhere on http://www.norml.org/ about
this.

Paul





Re: PIMB THC-shirts

2001-01-18 Thread Andy Wardley

On Jan 17,  4:05pm, Redvers Davies wrote:
> Myself and a couple of friends of mine were talking about this before
> and someone suggested that ingestion in cakes was healthier still and
> more "effective".

Healthier, certainly.  Smoking anything is bad for your respiratory
tract and lungs.  However, there is evidence to suggest that smoking
weed is nothing like as harmful as smoking tobacco.  It's not the tar
or the nicotine in tobacco that gives you lung cancer, but the
radiation...

More effective, yes, because none of the THC is lost to the atmosphere.
However, it takes an hour or so to notice the effects coming on and
when they do, there's no way to stop them.  So you might end up ingesting
twice as much as you planned, which you may (or may not :-) consider
wasteful if half as much would have had the desired effect.

Or so I've been told.  :-)=


A

-- 
Andy Wardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   Signature regenerating.  Please remain seated.
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   For a good time: http://www.kfs.org/~abw/