Re: Perl Geek Code
PLPM++I answer questions (correctly) on #london.pm
But aren't most of the questions on #london.pm of the form "shall we
go down the pub then?", to which there is a simple answer that's
almost always correct...
I toyed with the idea of taking this out, but I wanted it to be the same
as for PP, so that someone who is PP+++ is basically the same as someone
who is HLPM++ or suchlike...
Later.
Mark.
--
print "\n",map{my$a="\n"if(length$_6);' 'x(36-length($_)/2)."$_\n$a"} (
Name = 'Mark Fowler',Title = 'Technology Developer' ,
Firm = 'Profero Ltd',Web = 'http://www.profero.com/' ,
Email = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', Phone = '+44 (0) 20 7700 9960' )
Re: Perl Geek Code
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 04:00:35PM +, Mark Fowler wrote: PLPM++I answer questions (correctly) on #london.pm But aren't most of the questions on #london.pm of the form "shall we go down the pub then?", to which there is a simple answer that's almost always correct... PLPM+ I occasionally visit #london.pm I like the idea that we're an actual place. Maybe a good bar or curryhouse.
Re: Perl Geek Code
Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I like the idea that we're an actual place. Maybe a good bar or curryhouse. That wouldn't be Penderel's Oak then... We're meeting on Thursday, right? -- Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com Apache, mod_perl, MySQL, Sybase hired gun for, well, hire -
Re: Perl Geek Code
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 06:28:29PM +, David Hodgkinson wrote: Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I like the idea that we're an actual place. Maybe a good bar or curryhouse. That wouldn't be Penderel's Oak then... We're meeting on Thursday, right? If we aren't I'm going to be getting pretty lonely drinking on my own...
Re: Perl Geek Code
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 07:45:56PM +, David Hodgkinson wrote: Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 06:28:29PM +, David Hodgkinson wrote: We're meeting on Thursday, right? If we aren't I'm going to be getting pretty lonely drinking on my own... I'll join you. Leo said he was coming too. I may even make it this time. R
Re: Perl Geek Code
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 08:52:56PM +, Roger Burton West wrote: I'll join you. Leo said he was coming too. I may even make it this time. I think we *are* having a proper meeting, anyway. Looking forward to recover from spending christmas at home... Michael
Re: Perl Geek Code
* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 07:45:56PM +, David Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 06:28:29PM +, David Hodgkinson wrote: Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I like the idea that we're an actual place. Maybe a good bar or curryhouse. That wouldn't be Penderel's Oak then... We're meeting on Thursday, right? If we aren't I'm going to be getting pretty lonely drinking on my own... I'll join you. Leo said he was coming too. I'll be there too. There will be moaning about firewalls :( i'm already planning my drinks, virgin marys, pints of coke and more virgin marys -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
Re: Perl Geek Code
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 07:31:21PM +, Dave Cross wrote: Interesting post on PerlMonks today: http://perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=48718 Ok, I'm really confused where *I* fit in in the MO (perl mongers) category... ok, for the complet(ish) sections so far i come in as ... C W+++ R++ M++ O+++ C+ X++ WP PM++ o CO+ LCJP uBLS Ee i'm just surprised that this hasnt been done as XML from v1 so it would be easier to write the code2plaintext ;-) greg -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
Re: Perl Geek Code
David H. Adler [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: * *I'm not sure how I should feel about this We should make a scotch category :) e.
