Re: Schroedingers Computer
"Barbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://www.nature.com/nsu/010503/010503-6.html > > "So far, demonstrations of quantum computing have been limited to the most > rudimentary of calculations, involving only two or three bits of > information. " > > I'm sure Damian could them straight on that one ;-P And there was a demonstration of a 7 qubit computer last year! -- 1024/D9C69DF9 steve mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED] i gained nothing at all from supreme enlightenment, and for that very reason it is called supreme enlightenment. -- gotama buddha
Re: Schroedingers Computer
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:55:47PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > "So far, demonstrations of quantum computing have been limited to the most > rudimentary of calculations, involving only two or three bits of > information. " > > I'm sure Damian could them straight on that one ;-P Hmm, I think Damian's module ought to be called Classical::NonDeterminism. Lovely though it is, it's (theoretically) more powerful than quantum computers are known to be... .robin. -- A man, a plan, a cat, a ham, a yak, a yam, a hat, a canal--Panama! --Guy Jacobson
Schroedingers Computer
http://www.nature.com/nsu/010503/010503-6.html "So far, demonstrations of quantum computing have been limited to the most rudimentary of calculations, involving only two or three bits of information. " I'm sure Damian could them straight on that one ;-P Barbie
