Re: [Lsr] Adjacency SID and Passive Interface
On 5/10/19 9:58 AM, olivier.dug...@orange.com wrote: > In the current state of Segment Routing drafts, do you think it is possible > to advertise > Adjacency SID on such passive or inter-domain interfaces or do we need to > specify this behaviour > in a new draft ? > > For me I don't see anything in the drafts that prohibits this kind of > advertisement, but perhaps I'm wrong. My understanding is that the SID is specific to an adjacency and advertised in IS-IS in either TLV 22, 222, 23, 223. As adjacencies will not be formed on a passive interface, an adjacency SID should not be advertised for the passive interface. I might also be wrong here, though. All Best, Chris ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
[Lsr] Implementation of Source/Destination Routing for IS-IS
Hello, just wanted to let you know that with the recently released version 6.0, FRRouting has gained support for draft-ietf-isis-ipv6-dst-src-routing-00, a control plane for draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-06. A simple sample configuration looks like this: ! ipv6 route 2001:db8::/64 from 2001:db8:1::/64 fe80::2 dummy0 ! interface dummy0 ipv6 address fe80::1/64 ! interface src-rtr-b ipv6 address fe80::1/64 ipv6 router isis 1 isis network point-to-point ! router isis 1 net 49...0001.00 redistribute ipv6 static level-1 topology ipv6-dstsrc ! Feel free to take it for a spin and let me know if you encounter any issues or have suggestions for any improvements. All Best, Chris ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
