Hi WG,

This version addresses all comments from the IETF117th meeting.
The updates mainly include:
1. Added the use case for AC-flag.
2.Added description of how router will use AC-flag.

Any comments or suggestions are welcome.

Best Regards,
Ran


Original


From: internet-dra...@ietf.org <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
To: 赵德涛10132546;Ketan Talaulikar <ketan.i...@gmail.com>;Peter Psenak 
<ppse...@cisco.com>;陈然00080434;
Date: 2024年01月25日 15:38
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-05.txt

A new version of Internet-Draft draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-05.txt has been
successfully submitted by Ran Chen and posted to the
IETF repository.
 
Name:     draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag
Revision: 05
Title:    Updates to Anycast Property advertisement for OSPFv2
Date:     2024-01-25
Group:    Individual Submission
Pages:    6
URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-05.txt
Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag/
HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag
Diff:     
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-05
 
Abstract:
 
   Both SR-MPLS prefix-SID and IPv4 prefix may be configured as anycast
   and as such the same value can be advertised by multiple routers.  It
   is useful for other routers to know that the advertisement is for an
   anycast identifier.
 
   Each prefix is advertised along with an 8-bit field of
   capabilities,by using the flag flield in the OSPFv2 Extended Prefix
   TLV [RFC7684], but the definition of anycast flag to identify the
   prefix as anycast has not yet been defined.
 
   This document updates [RFC7684], by defining a new flag in the OSPFv2
   Extended Prefix TLV Flags [RFC7684] to advertise the anycast
   property.
 
 
 
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to