Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] PCManFM 0.9.7 + libfm 0.1.12 RC1
Thanks, I also had to mv pcmanfm2 to pcmanfm2_v0.95 and create a new soft link to the new version over at /usr/local/bin/pcmanfm for it to launch, Regards, Phill. On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Jaeic Lee zerax...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by 'killing' version 0.95, but you could change /usr/bin/pcmanfm (which is a soft-link to pcmanfm2 at the same folder) so that it points to your newly compiled version. It shouldn't cause much problem as long as you remember to change it back after you are done testing. On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Phillip Whiteside phi...@phillw.netwrote: Hi, well, after a few set backs I've got pcmanfm v0.97 installed. Is there a way to make it my default within lubuntu instead of having to kill 0.95? (I have also compiled it with debug enabled so that should it give problems I can re-run inside gdb) - If i need to just compile it all in non-debug mode and delete something let me know :-) Regards, Phill. On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 4:14 AM, PCMan pcman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! Tarballs: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcmanfm/files/ HowTo: http://wiki.lxde.org/en/PCManFM_build_and_setup_guide We need to know if the smb:// thing works with Windows and if not, why? This is a must-have and we need to fix it before 1.0. On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Phillip Whiteside phi...@phillw.net wrote: Hi pcman, as promised in the #lubuntu IRC last night I have put WinXP back onto the other laptop. Can you tell me where to get the latest release of the pcman and libfm from? If I need to compile them up, I should be able to that without too many problems (You got me through the last time I did it). the only step I do not know is that of removing the existing versions so that the system uses only the new ones (If you recall, I did manage to have two instances of pcmanfm running at once). I've got a 'clean' lubuntu partition installed, would you prefer that i pull in the proposed updates from the main ubuntu library (those that are queuing for 10.04.1) or leave it as 'pure' lubuntu 10.04 installation? Regards, Phill. On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 11:39 AM, PCMan pcman...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, The new file manager is now entering RC1. Most of the bugs in pcmanfm bug tracker are cleared and the stability is generally good. As we are now in feature-freeze, no new features are added and this is a bug fix release. Please get it heavily tested. Current plan is to make 2 ~ 3 RC release before the final stable release. I'll make RC release when I fix most of the solvable problems. However, I won't decide when to release final stable version myself this time. I leave the decision regarding to when to make a 1.0 stable release to our package maintainers for ArchLinux, Debian, Fedora, SuSE, and Ubuntu and our translation coordinator. If all of them agree that the file manager is stable enough and there should be a 1.0 stable release, we'll make one. This should ensure enough quality assurance for this major component of LXDE. Thank you all ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Cleaning Lubuntu applications (part 1)
I could never get pyNeighborhood to work so I installed Nautilus instead to connect to my Windows network. If the new pcmanfm can handle the task, then I would be happy to remove pyNeighborhood. This was using the pyNeighborhood that was installed by default with Lubuntu, I did not install the PPA version you mentioned. From: gi...@ubuntu.com To: lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 00:22:26 +0200 Subject: [Lubuntu-desktop] Cleaning Lubuntu applications (part 1) Hi, I would like to discuss the removal of several applications : - parcelite The main goal was to add a clipboard manager, because old pcmanfm didn't manage it well. Now that pcmanfm2 is used, I would like to know if people experiment problems with copy paste without parcelite. If you don't have any problems, we could remove it from the meta-package. Also, parcelite is abandoned upstream (http://parcellite.sourceforge.net/?p=89), so don't expect improvement in maverick cycle. - pyNeighborhood With pcmanfm now using gvfs, we have good support for mounting. I wonder if we really need a GUI for managing mounts. Also, It seems that the current version on 10.04 is broken, if you want to test and add feedbacks, be sure to test the PPA version (https://launchpad.net/~pyneighborhood/+archive/stable) If you think about other things to remove, feel free to add them in the discussion. Please note that adding and replacing applications should be discuss in separate topics :) Regards, Julien Lavergne ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _ The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendarocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Lubuntu Desktop] Replace Aqualung with deadbeef.
deadbeef is blocked by a license problem on Debian. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533555 and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576975 Regards, Julien Lavergne Le mardi 01 juin 2010 à 00:18 +0100, Phillip Whiteside a écrit : Is there any chance of deadbeef getting into the ubuntu repos? imho, it does seem at a more advanced stage of development than aqualung. Regards, Phill. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Lubuntu-desktop] Installing Lubuntu on software RAID
Hi everyone! I'm trying to install Lubuntu but I can't find a way to configure software RAID.. Should I do it by hand before running the installation? (that is, sudo apt-get install mdadm, mdadm -A etc etc..) Or is it better to avoid this completely (because it's untested or whatever) and install a normal Ubuntu followed by LXDE? Many thanks for your time, and Lubuntu too of course :) ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Installing Lubuntu on software RAID
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:34:11 +0100, Federico Fanton jor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone! I'm trying to install Lubuntu but I can't find a way to configure software RAID.. Should I do it by hand before running the installation? (that is, sudo apt-get install mdadm, mdadm -A etc etc..) Or is it better to avoid this completely (because it's untested or whatever) and install a normal Ubuntu followed by LXDE? Many thanks for your time, and Lubuntu too of course :) The easist/safest way, is to use the Ubuntu alternative ISO to set up RAID and install Ubuntu minimal. The enable the Lubuntu-Desktop PPA and install lubuntu-desktop. This worked for me anyway :) -- Steve (Yorvyk) http://lubuntu.net ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Lubuntu Desktop] Replace Aqualung with deadbeef.
Hi, I've had a read through that bug list. ::smacks head on wall:: libdumb is well named, their web-page is about as infantile as well. I've emailed off to the link on the source-forge page for deadbeef letting them know that there is a problem, I guess we just have to wait. Putting stuff out with such silly things in the license agreement as libdumb have is just asking for problems. If some one would like to tell the authors of libdumb, just how silly they are being that is up to them, I'm more interested in getting deadbeef available. And, yes, I also think libdumb should be struck from the Debian library, but that's got nothing to do with me either. Regards, Phill. On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Glenn glenn_de_gr...@hotmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am sorry but, wait again: How come libdumb itself can be in the ubuntu repo´s with the debian guys complaining, but deadbeef cant? Op 01-06-10 20:26, Julien Lavergne schreef: deadbeef is blocked by a license problem on Debian. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533555 and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576975 Regards, Julien Lavergne Le mardi 01 juin 2010 à 00:18 +0100, Phillip Whiteside a écrit : Is there any chance of deadbeef getting into the ubuntu repos? imho, it does seem at a more advanced stage of development than aqualung. Regards, Phill. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMBVT6AAoJEFx07M0xzp8wpQcH/1FbTWxLyvGarbpIskYzQGvl CSus6wKsg8JB36vZgn1KMO6woFYtUECzfpahi8cyFCB5XpP3X4YKA5MOic7l5ILP 844J5NrkNCxu0PiFout8L8CDaUW9lp9/qMBwFKKwKwbpRJr6FD9iyCl2giMI/NKF OJ+5bAC/8t6U5Kh/it4YWv27sLKQPOgGsNDR5w4DFQNHRcnEjOfDBEKFY7HcE8jM jSYObY8SBjNvP0hd58kHkcdCiIE5huSP7WsR9+fo8Eb8T4vqy0v7eqgp7Wbfuw3t e431xVUmP5Tl6Z7s6IRbsYxpscgtI+OH+1nyV9UoPxsvcqjVqLvGoc3/0UPHlgk= =Jxjo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Lubuntu-desktop] [Ubuntu Desktop] Required
Hi, I guess this is more a question for Juliene, but one of things that has been raised a few times on IRC is why lubuntu *insists *on having all the packages that it does, for example you cannot remove Mplayer to free room up and put an alternative on, nor xfburn if you wish brasserro. Whilst the list of default packages is commendable, it does seem somewhat odd that none of them may be removed without it taking out the whole of lubuntu. The argument of 'more difficult to support' does not really stand, people want to make their computer their own, the whole idea of *buntu is choice, we can easily say that we cannot support xyz, but forcing people to have applications on that they do not want seems odd. Regards, Phill. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Ubuntu Desktop] Required
If you are talking about why 'lubuntu-desktop' package would be removed when one small part of its dependency is removed, you can choose to ignore it and remove that package since it is only a meta-package that contains (literally) nothing inside it. It won't hurt other programs. Besides, the first thing that I did when I installed lubuntu in my netbook was to remove xfburn, and my desktop works just as fine :) Of course, if your package manager insists that other parts of lubuntu-desktop to be removed as well, that's another story... On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Phillip Whiteside phi...@phillw.net wrote: Hi, I guess this is more a question for Juliene, but one of things that has been raised a few times on IRC is why lubuntu *insists *on having all the packages that it does, for example you cannot remove Mplayer to free room up and put an alternative on, nor xfburn if you wish brasserro. Whilst the list of default packages is commendable, it does seem somewhat odd that none of them may be removed without it taking out the whole of lubuntu. The argument of 'more difficult to support' does not really stand, people want to make their computer their own, the whole idea of *buntu is choice, we can easily say that we cannot support xyz, but forcing people to have applications on that they do not want seems odd. Regards, Phill. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Lubuntu Desktop] Replace Aqualung with deadbeef.
We already knew this long time ago. Last week we've contacted author of deadbeef and some debian devs trying to solve this. The latest version of deadbeef now includes a newer version of libdumb whose license is more debian-friendly. Now let's see what debian people think. If this is still not acceptable, turning off libdumb while compiling deadbeef is the solution. This lib is optional and rarely used. It provides decoder for *.mod music only. libdumb can be safely removed if the license issue cannot be handled. Cheers On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Phillip Whiteside phi...@phillw.net wrote: Hi, I've had a read through that bug list. ::smacks head on wall:: libdumb is well named, their web-page is about as infantile as well. I've emailed off to the link on the source-forge page for deadbeef letting them know that there is a problem, I guess we just have to wait. Putting stuff out with such silly things in the license agreement as libdumb have is just asking for problems. If some one would like to tell the authors of libdumb, just how silly they are being that is up to them, I'm more interested in getting deadbeef available. And, yes, I also think libdumb should be struck from the Debian library, but that's got nothing to do with me either. Regards, Phill. On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Glenn glenn_de_gr...@hotmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am sorry but, wait again: How come libdumb itself can be in the ubuntu repo´s with the debian guys complaining, but deadbeef cant? Op 01-06-10 20:26, Julien Lavergne schreef: deadbeef is blocked by a license problem on Debian. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533555 and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576975 Regards, Julien Lavergne Le mardi 01 juin 2010 à 00:18 +0100, Phillip Whiteside a écrit : Is there any chance of deadbeef getting into the ubuntu repos? imho, it does seem at a more advanced stage of development than aqualung. Regards, Phill. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMBVT6AAoJEFx07M0xzp8wpQcH/1FbTWxLyvGarbpIskYzQGvl CSus6wKsg8JB36vZgn1KMO6woFYtUECzfpahi8cyFCB5XpP3X4YKA5MOic7l5ILP 844J5NrkNCxu0PiFout8L8CDaUW9lp9/qMBwFKKwKwbpRJr6FD9iyCl2giMI/NKF OJ+5bAC/8t6U5Kh/it4YWv27sLKQPOgGsNDR5w4DFQNHRcnEjOfDBEKFY7HcE8jM jSYObY8SBjNvP0hd58kHkcdCiIE5huSP7WsR9+fo8Eb8T4vqy0v7eqgp7Wbfuw3t e431xVUmP5Tl6Z7s6IRbsYxpscgtI+OH+1nyV9UoPxsvcqjVqLvGoc3/0UPHlgk= =Jxjo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Lubuntu Desktop] Replace Aqualung with deadbeef.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 That´s good news! Let´s hope the Debian people will cooperate. - -Glenn Op 02-06-10 06:56, PCMan schreef: We already knew this long time ago. Last week we've contacted author of deadbeef and some debian devs trying to solve this. The latest version of deadbeef now includes a newer version of libdumb whose license is more debian-friendly. Now let's see what debian people think. If this is still not acceptable, turning off libdumb while compiling deadbeef is the solution. This lib is optional and rarely used. It provides decoder for *.mod music only. libdumb can be safely removed if the license issue cannot be handled. Cheers -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMBeg1AAoJEFx07M0xzp8wlL4H/1GsfknVoQwExkpNI79UG/W6 BktJI9+4bV1/UqjXTuW6MAmDdoZucGkzs30DUNfrgLvJoJIKHGXzyucCnNsMpBGx EjnLMPb7ewOtt09FxYCFx346J2LJETwhPwcpvl53jkCZyjyJRyJokYLvCo7JMuUE RSIVn4xnVw1UMtQDP1g1SQd2WXeDa+neioABAPzCkVF3Da3Y756JkTwV1qRlY40X ijuclpMgG6Nw7M1MxDM4AQQKV+z8SgIle1SPjurjppBwxr8m/f0Cn4ff93hpmVle q9IcVs/IONJUNqKnGodR4E4pAI2WjuvOZ2tKQMaNTU5M7dTd/6+bvfvDMtfQXvQ= =sLC8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
