RE: NLucene up to date ?
It would be great to see Nlucene continue. I've been using 1.2b2 and have a few bug fixes (some critical) which I'd be delighted to contribute. Alas, the sourceforge project doesn't show a lot of vitality of late, but the authors have suggest a new version is coming RSN... I know there has been some considerable debate about whether to keep with the translation to C# or just to re-host the Java Lucene 1.3 using vs.net's java compiler... -Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NLucene up to date ? Hi all, http://sourceforge.net/projects/nlucene/ has a version numbered 1.2b2. Does anyone know if this source is still being maintained to be closer to the java developments ? Was this an external project to Apache Jakarta ? I (we) have just successfully released a search engine using a c# implmentation of Lucene. Code had to be brought up to date in line with recent java builds, and enhanced with additional features (eg field sorting, term position score factoring, etc). Any other c# users who would like to see NLucene kept in line with the java version ? Maybe I'm just being lazy with having to maintain my own version of Lucene =). Surely there are others out there who are c# users and follow the mailing lists (I remember a Brian somewhere !) but seldom post. Brendon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NLucene up to date ?
Yes, given the lack of updating the c# version I thought users would be maintaining their own version in line with current developments. I too had to add those items you mentioned. What I would like to see is all these 'implementations' consolidated and maintained regularly as per java. I am not sure how widely known Lucene is in the .NET community - my guess it it isn't. A tried and tested Lucene .NET version will definitely help it reach other audiences. I am pleased to hear Pasha (re)taking up the reigns. Brendon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I talked to one of the maintainers of NLucene and he said that he was planning on releasing a 1.2 version (not beta apparently) in two months. That was back in June and I haven't heard or seen anything since then so I cant really say if it is still being actively developed. Sounds like you are doing the same thing I am doing which is adding functionality that you need on your own. I've also added a few things to NLucene like multifield queries and the default boolean operator setting. Brian Hi all, http://sourceforge.net/projects/nlucene/ has a version numbered 1.2b2. Does anyone know if this source is still being maintained to be closer to the java developments ? Was this an external project to Apache Jakarta ? I (we) have just successfully released a search engine using a c# implmentation of Lucene. Code had to be brought up to date in line with recent java builds, and enhanced with additional features (eg field sorting, term position score factoring, etc). Any other c# users who would like to see NLucene kept in line with the java version ? Maybe I'm just being lazy with having to maintain my own version of Lucene =). Surely there are others out there who are c# users and follow the mailing lists (I remember a Brian somewhere !) but seldom post. Brendon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NLucene up to date ? Lucene.Net is up to date.
Excellent news. Will you be keeping the source up to date with the java developments ? Can't wait to get my hands on the source, yes that damn bit shift operator (unsigned ?) always worried me =) Just by the way, would the .NET version have a similar style sandbox area where users can submit small add-on type functionality ? For example, field sorting. Would love to share the code for use and comment as this seems to be a common request. Big thanks Pasha, Brendon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I talked to one of the maintainers of NLucene and he said that he was planning on releasing a 1.2 version (not beta apparently) in two months. That was back in June and I haven't heard or seen anything since then so I cant really say if it is still being actively developed. Sounds like you are doing the same thing I am doing which is adding functionality that you need on your own. I've also added a few things to NLucene like multifield queries and the default boolean operator setting. By the way, I hope that Lucene.Net 1.3rc1 will be available from http://sourceforge.net/ in this week. Lucene.Net is ready, but sourceforge is not :) Lucene.Net is a complete up to date port of Lucene 1.3rc1 includes samples and demos (web demo also). A few differences between nLucene and Lucene.net are: 1. version of Lucene: Lucene.Net is a 1.3rc1, nLucene - is a 1.2 2. java code compatible: Lucene.Net only change naming notation, like IndexWriter, nLucene implement some methods as a attributes and others 3. demos: Lucene.Net contain all of Lucene demos and tests include web demos. nLucene does not. 4. .NET Framework 1.1 and VS 2003 compatible 5. (for internal developer only): correct implement of java operator :) Pasha - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lucene.Net 1.3.rc1 now available from http://sourceforge.net/projects/lucenedotnet/
Hi, Lucene.Net 1.3.rc1 now available from http://sourceforge.net/projects/lucenedotnet/ Lucene.Net is a complete up to date port of Lucene 1.3.rc1 without any modifications and extentions of original Lucene code. Lucene.Net includes all original Lucene demos and tests, but not all work correct :) For example, HTMLTest doesn't work. Pasha - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
broken links
when I run the web demo, all the links are formed with luceneweb/ preceding them (the links are incorrect): ie-- the links come out as: http://localhost:8080/luceneweb/examples/foo.jsp when it should be: http://localhost:8080/examples/foo.jsp and I'm using tomcat, btw. (I sent this earlier along with a javacc question; which people did answerbut then this part was ignored, so I'm resending it.since the above is the problem that I'm really trying to solve) thanks -Jill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: broken links
solved. I was building the index incorrectly; the lucene code works just fine. -Jill (you need to go to a subdirectory directly under webapps, and use .. as the argument for the base of the index, I was using .. and doing it from webapps (Or from luceneweb ) that's why I got the broken links. but it works now :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ssoc.com To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: 08/04/2003 04:53 Subject: broken links PM Please respond to Lucene Users List when I run the web demo, all the links are formed with luceneweb/ preceding them (the links are incorrect): ie-- the links come out as: http://localhost:8080/luceneweb/examples/foo.jsp when it should be: http://localhost:8080/examples/foo.jsp and I'm using tomcat, btw. (I sent this earlier along with a javacc question; which people did answerbut then this part was ignored, so I'm resending it.since the above is the problem that I'm really trying to solve) thanks -Jill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AND instead OR for the search
Hi everybody, When I make a search, for example : Jakarta lucene The search engine interpret the query like Jakarta OR lucene I wish this could be Jakarta AND lucene (like the most of internet search engine) because the OR clause is not very intuitive for the users. Could we use a method for using AND instead OR when we use Lucene? Tanks for advance Sébastien
Re: AND instead OR for the search
I believe what you want is to use the setOperator function: QueryParser qp = new QueryParser(contents, analyzer); qp.setOperator(QueryParser.DEFAULT_OPERATOR_AND); Brian - Original Message - From: Sebastien X [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:19 PM Subject: AND instead OR for the search Hi everybody, When I make a search, for example : Jakarta lucene The search engine interpret the query like Jakarta OR lucene I wish this could be Jakarta AND lucene (like the most of internet search engine) because the OR clause is not very intuitive for the users. Could we use a method for using AND instead OR when we use Lucene? Tanks for advance Sébastien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
