Redefine the wildcards

2003-09-26 Thread paladin3
Hello
I use lucene to index a big database (3 millions of articles).
When i search the ref number 1423* all is fine but when i search the 142* i have a 
java.lang.outofmemory.
I've read here that it is because a too big number of possibilities (for exemple 
142001, 14200A etc) and not because of too much hits.
So i wonder if it possible to redefine the wildcards in lucene to make them replace 
only numbers and not caracters .

Thanks for your advices and excuse me for my poor english


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Document size

2003-09-26 Thread Carsten Khler
Hi!
How can I find out how many words of a document have been indexed?

Text of my document: Lucene is great
Indexed: 'Lucene','great'
...should return '2'.

Thanks in advance. Carsten


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Redefine the wildcards

2003-09-26 Thread lucene
On Friday 26 September 2003 15:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 because of too much hits. So i wonder if it possible to redefine the
 wildcards in lucene to make them replace only numbers and not caracters .

What about regular expressions?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Announcing SearchBlox Search Application 1.0

2003-09-26 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 07:58  AM, Robert Selvaraj wrote:
The SearchBlox FREE Edition is available free of charge and can index 
up to 1000 HTML documents.
This looks very slick!  I'd guess you'd not be interested in 
open-sourcing what you've done, but here's an idea to consider - use 
the free edition as an open source contribution to Lucene's codebase as 
a demo application :))  You'd get a lot of publicity for your 
commercial versions!

	Erik

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Announcing SearchBlox Search Application 1.0

2003-09-26 Thread Robert Selvaraj
Thanks Eric.

I definitely like the idea of including the FREE Edition's WAR file to 
the Lucene code base as a demo application. On one hand, it demonstrates 
the power of Lucene and on the other, as you have already pointed out, 
it will give SearchBlox a lot of publicity.

Let me know how we can take this further.

Robert

Erik Hatcher wrote:

On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 07:58  AM, Robert Selvaraj wrote:

The SearchBlox FREE Edition is available free of charge and can index 
up to 1000 HTML documents.


This looks very slick!  I'd guess you'd not be interested in 
open-sourcing what you've done, but here's an idea to consider - use the 
free edition as an open source contribution to Lucene's codebase as a 
demo application :))  You'd get a lot of publicity for your commercial 
versions!

Erik

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Announcing SearchBlox Search Application 1.0

2003-09-26 Thread Erik Hatcher
Robert,

On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 09:45  AM, Robert Selvaraj wrote:
Thanks Eric.
That's Erik, with a k :))

I definitely like the idea of including the FREE Edition's WAR file to 
the Lucene code base as a demo application. On one hand, it 
demonstrates the power of Lucene and on the other, as you have already 
pointed out, it will give SearchBlox a lot of publicity.
We would require the source code itself to be included in Apache's CVS 
repository for it to be included.  I'm in the midst of revamping the 
Lucene demo application, but your application certainly far supersedes 
any plans I had for it, so searchblox would make for an excellent 
replacement.

	Erik

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Announcing SearchBlox Search Application 1.0

2003-09-26 Thread Robert Selvaraj
It will not be possible to provide you with the source code!

All the editions of SearchBlox are built on the same code base and 
releasing the source code to Lucene will have a adverse impact on our 
commercial versions with the business model we are adopting at the moment.

Robert

Erik Hatcher wrote:

Robert,

On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 09:45  AM, Robert Selvaraj wrote:

Thanks Eric.


That's Erik, with a k :))

I definitely like the idea of including the FREE Edition's WAR file to 
the Lucene code base as a demo application. On one hand, it 
demonstrates the power of Lucene and on the other, as you have already 
pointed out, it will give SearchBlox a lot of publicity.


We would require the source code itself to be included in Apache's CVS 
repository for it to be included.  I'm in the midst of revamping the 
Lucene demo application, but your application certainly far supersedes 
any plans I had for it, so searchblox would make for an excellent 
replacement.

Erik

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Announcing SearchBlox Search Application 1.0

2003-09-26 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 10:16  AM, Robert Selvaraj wrote:
It will not be possible to provide you with the source code!

All the editions of SearchBlox are built on the same code base and 
releasing the source code to Lucene will have a adverse impact on our 
commercial versions with the business model we are adopting at the 
moment.
Well, it was worth a try :)

And I definitely understand your position.  The demo app of Lucene will 
hopefully eventually evolve into something like a searchbox-lite type 
of application.

	Erik

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]