RE: QueryParser.parse() and Lucene1.4.1

2004-09-17 Thread Morus Walter
Polina Litvak writes:
 Hi Daniel,
 
 I just downloaded the latest version of Lucene and tried the whole thing
 again: I ran my code first with lucene-1.3-final.jar, getting the query
 Field:(A AND -(B)) parsed into +Field:A -Field:B, and then I ran exactly
 the same code with lucene-1.4.1.jar and got the output parsed into
 Field:A Field:- Field:B.
 
 I also read Lucene's documentation (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*
 checkout*/jakarta-lucene/CHANGES.txt?rev=1.85), and it does mention a
 change to the + and - operators:
 
 13. Changed QueryParser.jj to allow '-' and '+' within tokens:
 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27491
 (Morus Walter via Otis)
 
This change is unlikely to introduce the behaviour you describe, since
it affects '-' within words only, not at start.
So there is a change for a-b between 1.3 and 1.4
1.3 gives a -b
1.4 gives a b or one token a-b (depending on the analyzer) as it treats
the - as part of a word.

 
 So is this behaviour a bug, or Lucene1.4 is not backwards compatible?
 
Your behaviour cannot be seen from the test code (as Daniel already said):

java -cp lucene-1.3-final/lucene-1.3-final.jar  
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser 'Field:(A AND -(B))'
+Field:a -Field:b

java -cp lucene-1.4-final/lucene-1.4-final.jar 
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser 'Field:(A AND -(B))'
+Field:a -Field:b

java -cp lucene-1.4.1/lucene-1.4.1.jar org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser 
'Field:(A AND -(B))'
+Field:a -Field:b

So either you have a different query or something in your code is responsable
for the problem.

Morus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: QueryParser.parse() and Lucene1.4.1

2004-09-17 Thread sergiu gordea
Hi Polima,
It seems to me that your query string is not correct ...
(A AND -(B))
AND = +
NOT = -
In lucene AND and NOT opperators are mapped internal to +/-,
(AND and NOT are supported only because they are comming from natural language)
so ...
A + - (B) makes no sense ...
Sergiu


Polina Litvak wrote:
I have a question regarding QueryParser and lucene-1.4.1.jar:
When using lucene-1.3-final.jar, a query of the form: Field:(A AND -(B))
was parsed into +Field:A -Field:B (using QueryParser.parse()). 
After making the switch to lucene-1.4.1.jar, the same query is being
parsed into Field:A Field:- Field:B which is not the desired outcome.

Does anyone know how to work around this new feature ?
 



Thanks,
Polina
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: QueryParser.parse() and Lucene1.4.1

2004-09-17 Thread Polina Litvak
I found the source of error:

Turns out that given a query of the form 'Field:(A AND-(B))' (note the
no space between 'AND' and '-'), lucene-1.3 would output +Field:a
-Field:b, while lucene-1.4 would output Field:a Field:- Field:b


Thanks for all the help and the suggestions.

Polina



-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: September 17, 2004 2:31 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: QueryParser.parse() and Lucene1.4.1

Polina Litvak writes:
 Hi Daniel,
 
 I just downloaded the latest version of Lucene and tried the whole
thing
 again: I ran my code first with lucene-1.3-final.jar, getting the
query
 Field:(A AND -(B)) parsed into +Field:A -Field:B, and then I ran
exactly
 the same code with lucene-1.4.1.jar and got the output parsed into
 Field:A Field:- Field:B.
 
 I also read Lucene's documentation
(http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*
 checkout*/jakarta-lucene/CHANGES.txt?rev=1.85), and it does mention a
 change to the + and - operators:
 
 13. Changed QueryParser.jj to allow '-' and '+' within tokens:
 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27491
 (Morus Walter via Otis)
 
This change is unlikely to introduce the behaviour you describe, since
it affects '-' within words only, not at start.
So there is a change for a-b between 1.3 and 1.4
1.3 gives a -b
1.4 gives a b or one token a-b (depending on the analyzer) as it
treats
the - as part of a word.

 
 So is this behaviour a bug, or Lucene1.4 is not backwards compatible?
 
Your behaviour cannot be seen from the test code (as Daniel already
said):

java -cp lucene-1.3-final/lucene-1.3-final.jar
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser 'Field:(A AND -(B))'
+Field:a -Field:b

java -cp lucene-1.4-final/lucene-1.4-final.jar
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser 'Field:(A AND -(B))'
+Field:a -Field:b

java -cp lucene-1.4.1/lucene-1.4.1.jar
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser 'Field:(A AND -(B))'
+Field:a -Field:b

So either you have a different query or something in your code is
responsable
for the problem.

Morus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: QueryParser.parse() and Lucene1.4.1

2004-09-16 Thread Polina Litvak
Hi Daniel,

I just downloaded the latest version of Lucene and tried the whole thing
again: I ran my code first with lucene-1.3-final.jar, getting the query
Field:(A AND -(B)) parsed into +Field:A -Field:B, and then I ran exactly
the same code with lucene-1.4.1.jar and got the output parsed into
Field:A Field:- Field:B.

I also read Lucene's documentation (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*
checkout*/jakarta-lucene/CHANGES.txt?rev=1.85), and it does mention a
change to the + and - operators:

13. Changed QueryParser.jj to allow '-' and '+' within tokens:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27491
(Morus Walter via Otis)


So is this behaviour a bug, or Lucene1.4 is not backwards compatible?


Polina


-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: September 15, 2004 5:07 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: QueryParser.parse() and Lucene1.4.1

On Wednesday 15 September 2004 21:58, Polina Litvak wrote:

 Does anyone know how to work around this new feature ?

I can't remember any changes in this area, but I just tried with the 
current version from CVS and the output is the one which you want.

Regards
 Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: QueryParser.parse() and Lucene1.4.1

2004-09-16 Thread Daniel Naber
On Thursday 16 September 2004 19:38, Polina Litvak wrote:

  I ran my code first with lucene-1.3-final.jar, getting the query
 Field:(A AND -(B)) parsed into +Field:A -Field:B

This code:
Query query = QueryParser.parse(Field:(AAA AND -(BBB)), field, new 
StandardAnalyzer());
System.out.println(query);

Will print this with Lucene 1.4.1:
+Field:aaa -Field:bbb

It will not work with A instead of AAA because A is a stopword. In 
other words, I still cannot reproduce your problem.

Regards
 Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



QueryParser.parse() and Lucene1.4.1

2004-09-15 Thread Polina Litvak
I have a question regarding QueryParser and lucene-1.4.1.jar:
 
When using lucene-1.3-final.jar, a query of the form: Field:(A AND -(B))
was parsed into +Field:A -Field:B (using QueryParser.parse()). 
After making the switch to lucene-1.4.1.jar, the same query is being
parsed into Field:A Field:- Field:B which is not the desired outcome.
 
Does anyone know how to work around this new feature ?
 
Thanks,
Polina


Re: QueryParser.parse() and Lucene1.4.1

2004-09-15 Thread Daniel Naber
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 21:58, Polina Litvak wrote:

 Does anyone know how to work around this new feature ?

I can't remember any changes in this area, but I just tried with the 
current version from CVS and the output is the one which you want.

Regards
 Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]