StopFilter-troubles

2002-03-27 Thread P . Witte

Dear Lucene-users,
has someone an answer to the following question:
If I add a StopFilter to my Analyzer, the stopwords I gave him will be left
out the query. So far, so good. But when my query is like this one: (field1
: x) AND (field2 : stopword) AND (field 1 : y)
the StopFilter will do its work, but the resulting query is a big mess :
(field1 : x) AND ( ) AND (field 1 : y), and because of that the
searching results ara no good. I hoped it would search for (field1 : x)
AND (field 1 : y). 
I think the StopFilter does a poor job here. Is anyone familiar with this
problem and has an answer for me? 
Puk Witte.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: StopFilter-troubles

2002-03-27 Thread Otis Gospodnetic


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Lucene-users,
 has someone an answer to the following question:
 If I add a StopFilter to my Analyzer, the stopwords I gave him will
 be left
 out the query. So far, so good. But when my query is like this one:
 (field1
 : x) AND (field2 : stopword) AND (field 1 : y)
 the StopFilter will do its work, but the resulting query is a big
 mess :
 (field1 : x) AND ( ) AND (field 1 : y), and because of that
 the
 searching results ara no good. I hoped it would search for (field1 :
 x)
 AND (field 1 : y). 
 I think the StopFilter does a poor job here. Is anyone familiar with
 this
 problem and has an answer for me? 
 Puk Witte.

I tried something like this on one Lucene index:
description:travel AND description:a

The results were the same as this query:
description:travel

This seems right to me.

Otis



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: StopFilter-troubles

2002-03-27 Thread P . Witte

Dear all, especially Otis Gospodnetic (thanks for your answer),
without ( )'s the StopFilter is doing a good job indeed, but if I put them
around parts of the query, then the searchResult is wrong. 
For example:
(field1 : x) AND (field2 : stopword) AND (field 1 : y)
So I'm afraid my problem is not solved yet. But maybe someone can try it
with the ()'s with his own tool and tell me if they've got the same problem.
Then I know whether I made a mistake. 

Puk Witte










--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: StopFilter-troubles

2002-03-27 Thread Otis Gospodnetic

I don't know enough about the query parser to be able to answer that
question, but why do you really need those parentheses?
It would also be great if you could submit this as a bug at
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/

Thanks,
Otis


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear all, especially Otis Gospodnetic (thanks for your answer),
 without ( )'s the StopFilter is doing a good job indeed, but if I put
 them
 around parts of the query, then the searchResult is wrong. 
 For example:
 (field1 : x) AND (field2 : stopword) AND (field 1 : y)
 So I'm afraid my problem is not solved yet. But maybe someone can try
 it
 with the ()'s with his own tool and tell me if they've got the same
 problem.
 Then I know whether I made a mistake. 
 
 Puk Witte
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]