Re: keep indexes as files or save them in database
On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 22:09 -0800, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: A number of people have tried putting Lucene indices in RDBMS. As far as I know, all were slower than FSDirectory. Do you know if the Berkeley DB back end also has a performance hit? Try it, it all depends on how you configure it. And that depends on your needs. I posted examples to the list last week. Andi.. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: keep indexes as files or save them in database
On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 22:09 -0800, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > A number of people have tried putting Lucene indices in RDBMS. As far > as I know, all were slower than FSDirectory. Do you know if the Berkeley DB back end also has a performance hit? -- Miles Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Runtime Collective Ltd. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: keep indexes as files or save them in database
A number of people have tried putting Lucene indices in RDBMS. As far as I know, all were slower than FSDirectory. Otis --- nafise hassani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > I want to know from the performance point of view it > is better to save lucene indexes in database or use > them as files??? > suggestion?? > best regards > > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! > http://my.yahoo.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
keep indexes as files or save them in database
Hi I want to know from the performance point of view it is better to save lucene indexes in database or use them as files??? suggestion?? best regards __ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
