Re: [lustre-discuss] Error with project quotas on 2.10.6
> On Mar 20, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Peter Jones wrote: > > If it's not in the manual then it should be. Could you please open an LUDOC > ticket to track getting this corrected if need be? Done. https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LUDOC-435 -- Rick Mohr Senior HPC System Administrator National Institute for Computational Sciences http://www.nics.tennessee.edu ___ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.7 released
Hi Gotz, This was an oversight in the release note generation and it has been updated to reflect the e2fsprogs version used in release testing (1.44.5.wc1). Thanks. Joe > On Mar 26, 2019, at 9:35 AM, Götz Waschk wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:53 PM Peter Jones wrote: >> We are pleased to announce that the Lustre 2.10.7 Release has been declared >> GA and is available for download. You can also grab the source from git. > Hi Peter, > > is e2fsprogs v1.42.13.wc6 still the recommended version or are newer > versions fine as well? > > Regards, Götz Waschk > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org ___ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.7 released
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:53 PM Peter Jones wrote: > We are pleased to announce that the Lustre 2.10.7 Release has been declared > GA and is available for download. You can also grab the source from git. Hi Peter, is e2fsprogs v1.42.13.wc6 still the recommended version or are newer versions fine as well? Regards, Götz Waschk ___ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
[lustre-discuss] Significance of LOV and LLITE metrics
Hi, I am looking for metrics that affect/reflect user I/O performance. So far I understand OST and MDT metrics are significant. But is there any other metrics which get updated during file write/read operation? Mainly I want to know what is the significance of LOV and LLITE metrics in terms of I/O. (As LOV is related to client, I think it might be significant, but not sure what does it indicate) Also what do these metrics in LLITE indicate? lazystatfs site checksum_pages lmv statahead_agl lov default_easize statahead_running_max dump_page_cache max_easize statahead_stats extents_stats fast_read stats_track_gid nosquash_nids stats_track_pid offset_stats stats_track_ppid fstype pio unstable_stats read_ahead_stats root_squash xattr_cache sbi_flags also whats the difference between kbytesavail and kbytesfree in the contest of lustre? ___ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
