Re: [lustre-discuss] E5-2667 or E5-2697A for MDS

2017-09-28 Thread Riccardo Veraldi 
Just out of curiosity how much is recommended to run a MDS on a virtual
machine (oVirt) ?
Are there any performance comparison/testing available ?
thanks

On 9/28/17 9:49 AM, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2017, at 04:54, forrest.wc.l...@dell.com wrote:
>> Hello :   
>>  
>> Our customer is going to configure Lustre FS, which will have a lot of small 
>> files to be accessed.
>>  
>> We are to configure 1TB Memory for MDS.
>>  
>> Regarding to CPU configuration , can we propose E5-2667 or E5-2697A for MDS 
>> for good performance ?
>>  
>> E5-2667 v4 : 3.2GHz, 8 Cores
>> E5-2697A v4: 2.6GHz, 16 cores
> There is a good presentation showing CPU speed vs. cores vs. MDS performance:
>
> https://www.eofs.eu/_media/events/lad14/03_shuichi_ihara_lustre_metadata_lad14.pdf
>
> Normally, higher GHz is good for the MDS, but if it reduces the number of
> cores by half, it may not be worthwhile.  It also depends on whether your
> workloads are mostly parallel (in which case more cores * GHz is better),
> or more serial (in which case a higher GHz is better).
>
> In this case, cores * GHz is 3.2GHz * 8 = 25.6GHz, and 2.6GHz * 16 = 41.6GHz,
> so you would probably get better aggregate performance from the E5-2697A as
> long as you have sufficient client parallelism to drive the system heavily.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger
> Lustre Principal Architect
> Intel Corporation
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Re: [lustre-discuss] E5-2667 or E5-2697A for MDS

2017-09-28 Thread Dilger, Andreas 
On Sep 28, 2017, at 04:54, forrest.wc.l...@dell.com wrote:
> 
> Hello :   
>  
> Our customer is going to configure Lustre FS, which will have a lot of small 
> files to be accessed.
>  
> We are to configure 1TB Memory for MDS.
>  
> Regarding to CPU configuration , can we propose E5-2667 or E5-2697A for MDS 
> for good performance ?
>  
> E5-2667 v4 : 3.2GHz, 8 Cores
> E5-2697A v4: 2.6GHz, 16 cores

There is a good presentation showing CPU speed vs. cores vs. MDS performance:

https://www.eofs.eu/_media/events/lad14/03_shuichi_ihara_lustre_metadata_lad14.pdf

Normally, higher GHz is good for the MDS, but if it reduces the number of
cores by half, it may not be worthwhile.  It also depends on whether your
workloads are mostly parallel (in which case more cores * GHz is better),
or more serial (in which case a higher GHz is better).

In this case, cores * GHz is 3.2GHz * 8 = 25.6GHz, and 2.6GHz * 16 = 41.6GHz,
so you would probably get better aggregate performance from the E5-2697A as
long as you have sufficient client parallelism to drive the system heavily.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation







___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

[lustre-discuss] E5-2667 or E5-2697A for MDS

2017-09-28 Thread Forrest.Wc.Ling 
Hello :

Our customer is going to configure Lustre FS, which will have a lot of small 
files to be accessed.

We are to configure 1TB Memory for MDS.

Regarding to CPU configuration , can we propose E5-2667 or E5-2697A for MDS for 
good performance ?

E5-2667 v4 : 3.2GHz, 8 Cores;
E5-2697A v4: 2.6GHz, 16 cores ;

Thanks,
Forrest Ling (凌巍才)
+86 18600622522
Dell HPC Product Technologist Greater China
___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org