Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

[Riccardo Veraldi]

you can use the dkms lustre package (build it from rpms) and get rid of
kmod dependencies

On 7/17/17 9:42 AM, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I wasn't able to install the official binary build of
> kmod-lustre-osd-zfs, even with kmod-zfs-0.6.5.9-1.el7_3.centos from
> from zfsonlinux.org, the ksym deps do not match. For me, it is always
> rebuilding the lustre source rpm against the zfs kmod packages.
>
> Regards, Götz Waschk
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Jones, Peter A  
> wrote:
>> 0.6.5.9 according to lustre/Changelog. We have tested with pre-release 
>> versions of 0.7 during the release cycle too if that’s what you’re wondering.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/17/17, 1:55 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Götz Waschk" 
>> > goetz.was...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> which version of kmod-zfs was the official Lustre 2.10.0 binary
>>> release for CentOS 7.3 built against?
>>>
>>> Regards, Götz Waschk
>>> ___
>>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>>> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
>>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
> ___
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>

___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

[Cowe, Malcolm J]

The further complication is that the Lustre kmod packages, including 
kmod-zfs-osd, are compiled against the “lustre-patched” kernel 
(3.10.0-514.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64), rather than the unpatched OS distribution 
kernel that the ZoL packages are no doubt compiled against. The move to 
patchless kernels for LDISKFS (which more or less works today, provided you 
don’t need project quotas) will further simplify binary distribution of the 
Lustre modules.

Malcolm.

On 18/7/17, 9:01 am, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Dilger, Andreas" 
 
wrote:

To be clear - we do not _currently_ build the Lustre RPMs against a binary 
RPM from ZoL, but rather build our own ZFS RPM packages, then build the Lustre 
RPMs against those packages.  This was done because ZoL didn't provide binary 
RPM packages when we started using ZFS, and we are currently not able to ship 
the binary RPM packages ourselves.

We are planning to change the Lustre build process to use the ZoL 
pre-packaged binary RPMs for Lustre 2.11, so that the binary RPM packages we 
build can be used together with the ZFS RPMs installed by end users.  If that 
change is not too intrusive, we will also try to backport this to b2_10 for a 
2.10.x maintenance release.

Cheers, Andreas

On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:42, Götz Waschk  wrote:
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> I wasn't able to install the official binary build of
> kmod-lustre-osd-zfs, even with kmod-zfs-0.6.5.9-1.el7_3.centos from
> from zfsonlinux.org, the ksym deps do not match. For me, it is always
> rebuilding the lustre source rpm against the zfs kmod packages.
> 
> Regards, Götz Waschk
> 
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Jones, Peter A  
wrote:
>> 0.6.5.9 according to lustre/Changelog. We have tested with pre-release 
versions of 0.7 during the release cycle too if that’s what you’re wondering.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/17/17, 1:55 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Götz Waschk" 
 
wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> which version of kmod-zfs was the official Lustre 2.10.0 binary
>>> release for CentOS 7.3 built against?
>>> 
>>> Regards, Götz Waschk
>>> ___
>>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>>> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
>>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
> ___
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation







___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

[Dilger, Andreas]

To be clear - we do not _currently_ build the Lustre RPMs against a binary RPM 
from ZoL, but rather build our own ZFS RPM packages, then build the Lustre RPMs 
against those packages.  This was done because ZoL didn't provide binary RPM 
packages when we started using ZFS, and we are currently not able to ship the 
binary RPM packages ourselves.

We are planning to change the Lustre build process to use the ZoL pre-packaged 
binary RPMs for Lustre 2.11, so that the binary RPM packages we build can be 
used together with the ZFS RPMs installed by end users.  If that change is not 
too intrusive, we will also try to backport this to b2_10 for a 2.10.x 
maintenance release.

Cheers, Andreas

On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:42, Götz Waschk  wrote:
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> I wasn't able to install the official binary build of
> kmod-lustre-osd-zfs, even with kmod-zfs-0.6.5.9-1.el7_3.centos from
> from zfsonlinux.org, the ksym deps do not match. For me, it is always
> rebuilding the lustre source rpm against the zfs kmod packages.
> 
> Regards, Götz Waschk
> 
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Jones, Peter A  
> wrote:
>> 0.6.5.9 according to lustre/Changelog. We have tested with pre-release 
>> versions of 0.7 during the release cycle too if that’s what you’re wondering.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/17/17, 1:55 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Götz Waschk" 
>> > goetz.was...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> which version of kmod-zfs was the official Lustre 2.10.0 binary
>>> release for CentOS 7.3 built against?
>>> 
>>> Regards, Götz Waschk
>>> ___
>>> lustre-discuss mailing list
>>> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
>>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
> ___
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation







___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

[Jones, Peter A]

0.6.5.9 according to lustre/Changelog. We have tested with pre-release versions 
of 0.7 during the release cycle too if that’s what you’re wondering.




On 7/17/17, 1:55 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Götz Waschk" 
 
wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>which version of kmod-zfs was the official Lustre 2.10.0 binary
>release for CentOS 7.3 built against?
>
>Regards, Götz Waschk
>___
>lustre-discuss mailing list
>lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
>http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

[lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

[Götz Waschk]

Hi everyone,

which version of kmod-zfs was the official Lustre 2.10.0 binary
release for CentOS 7.3 built against?

Regards, Götz Waschk
___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org