[LUTE] Re: My facsimile list
Dear Olsen, In general, it depends on a mailer for the return line feed at unexpected position. Thank you. * Toshiaki Kakinami E-mail : tk...@orchid.plala.or.jp Blog : http://kakitoshilute.blogspot.com * -Original Message- From: Adam Olsen [mailto:arol...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 2:11 AM To: T.Kakinami Cc: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: My facsimile list Missing an l at the end there: http://kakitoshilute.blogspot.jp/2012/07/facsimiles-list-preliminary-2nd.htm l On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 6:25 AM, T.Kakinami tk...@orchid.plala.or.jp wrote: Dear list, My facsimile list was revised. http://kakitoshilute.blogspot.jp/2012/07/facsimiles-list-preliminary-2 nd.htm l * Toshiaki Kakinami E-mail : tk...@orchid.plala.or.jp Blog : http://kakitoshilute.blogspot.com * To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Tynwald Day
went to the Isle of Man this Easter. It was cold, often wet, and I had a tooth infection, so it was great holiday. ...bought a little book of Manx tunes Here's a very, very quick go at Va Nancy ayne Lunnon from the Clague Collection. [1]http://www.pluckedturkeys.co.uk/Vn.mp3 I don't know if this is a Manx tune or simply a tune collected on the Isle of Man. Maybe it's a generic 'West European' folk tune (in dorian)? Stuart On 6 July 2012 06:05, David Tayler [2]vidan...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Happy Tynwald Day! Some delicious Scarlatti for your entertainment. [3]http://youtu.be/QrEpRJR4pFc?hd=1 To get on or off this list see list information at [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.pluckedturkeys.co.uk/Vn.mp3 2. mailto:vidan...@sbcglobal.net 3. http://youtu.be/QrEpRJR4pFc?hd=1 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Tynwald Day
Thank you - delicious, wonderful, beautiful - whatever adjective you prefer. In addition to the superb performance, though, thank you for such a thoroughly professional production. The care you take in assuring high quality in both the audio and video presentation is much appreciated, as well as is your giving full due to all the performers and to the instruments - or their makers - that they play. Ned On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:05 AM, David Tayler wrote: Happy Tynwald Day! Some delicious Scarlatti for your entertainment. http://youtu.be/QrEpRJR4pFc?hd=1 To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: YouTube going too far?
Harry Fox is one of the collection agencies that leans to the trolling side, that is, you may get flagged for material that seems to be completely unrelated to your work, even referring to a different work, and they don't answer your email. Since they have a fax number, I would suggest sending a fax, stating that they are infringing on your revenue or rights or whatever. I'm assuming that you disputed it, and since they probably will not get back to you the claim will disappear after one month. It is important to remember a few things here. First, you dispute will not be read by anyone with any knowledge of anything, so to try to present a reasonable, logical case is a complete waste of time. You need to show proof. Second, there is no point in saying you made an arrangement, as that will look suspect. Third, if it is your edition, you should write and sign a letter saying that you own all the rights to the edition (which, if it really is your edition, you do). In the letter, you must grant permission to your channel to use your work including all distro rights. Fourth, if there is an online, PD version free and clear, you should make it a priority to link to it. State, I used IMSLP, and here is the link. No way for them to wriggle around that. In general, the copyright laws are quite complex. For example there are many, many cases where one edition lifts material from another one. Who owns the copyrights then? Well, no way to determine that. Best to steer clear completely away. What does YouTube want? They want to keep it online and not have to deal with it. So they need a CYA letter from you, a clear, concise single letter that assign any and all distribution rights to the performance, the edition, and any artwork or graphics--saying you have the rights from edition X (your edition) or a link to the PD file, or both. The trolls will not go away. They reason is that 50 percent of the troll-ees will neither know nor care, and trolls just collect the ad revenue for no work. Free money for them. They aren't interested in your work or rights. There is a head bean-counter just counting videos. And that is it, EOS. 95 percent of my videos are flagged immediately, and half of those are flagged by three or four different freeloaders. Obviously they can't all be right, and YouTube knows they are trolls. Just dispute it, write a formal letter (safe it as a template), and wait. Your video will show disputed and no ads will appear. dt --- On Thu, 7/5/12, David van Ooijen davidvanooi...@gmail.com wrote: From: David van Ooijen davidvanooi...@gmail.com Subject: [LUTE] Re: YouTube going too far? To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Date: Thursday, July 5, 2012, 7:14 AM On 5 July 2012 16:05, Ron Andrico [1]praelu...@hotmail.com wrote: To make a long story short, the only words Youtube needs to see in response is that the music is in the Public Domain, or the person posting the music is the verified copyright holder. The challenge is then automatically withdrawn. It is not. Because this is the second time YouTube challenges this particular (and not at all popular) video. I'm not in it for the money, but coorperation claiming Greensleeves simply feels wrong. I also post 'fingerstyle covers' of pop songs (I've just recorded Paradise by Sade, early music of sorts. I will upload later today). Obviously these are far more popular, and obviously there are copyright holders involved who claim their share. Fair enough. But Greensleeves ... David -- *** David van Ooijen [2]davidvanooi...@gmail.com www.davidvanooijen.nl *** To get on or off this list see list information at [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=praelu...@hotmail.com 2. file://localhost/mc/compose?to%c3%9avidvanooi...@gmail.com 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: YouTube going too far?
This process is amazingly intrusive. As part of my ongoing effort to post video from the recent LSA Summer Seminar on the LuteSocietyofAmerica channel on YouTube, I posted privately a section of raw video from the Participants' Concert so the performers could audition it prior to editing and posting it. Note that there is no text in the video, since I have not edited in the titles, and there is no meaningful text on the descriptive page, only the filename: 20120629-01-Kathryn, and the note that this is unedited video of their two lute songs. For this unlisted video, I have been flagged for matched third party content. When I check on the reason, I learn that: Your video may include the following copyrighted content: DOWLAND: LADY, IF YOU SO, musical composition administered by: One or more music publishing rights collecting societies The piece named is in fact the **second** song in the file. So someone has been paid to create pattern matching software that checks the whole of every video posted and to load a truly astounding number of sequences of notes into the system. Where will this end? Scary. Daniel Heiman -Original Message- From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of David Tayler Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 18:09 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Re: TRe: YouTube going too far? I'm sorry to hear that. Unfortunately, they may claim that they actually own it (and then they are real trolls, after all). Then you have very little recourse. --- On Thu, 7/5/12, Sauvage Valery sauvag...@orange.fr wrote: From: Sauvage Valery sauvag...@orange.fr Subject: [LUTE] TRe: YouTube going too far? To: 'Lute List' lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Date: Thursday, July 5, 2012, 7:55 AM I had often the same problem (Dowland, Narvaez, Milan, Bach...). I just disput the claim and usually they automatically withdrawn. Last one was about la Cancion del Emperador... I disput the claim (by Harry Fox Cie) but they maintain it, I had to delete the video, then to post it again, they again claim on it and I argue in the disput with the fact it was published in Spain in 1538 (so public domain), that I played myself, from the original source and I add the following text : Music and lyrics published in 1922 or earlier are in the Public Domain in the United States. No one can claim ownership of a song in the public domain. Public Domain music and songs may be used by anyone . . . without permission, without royalties, and without any limitations whatsoever. And sayed that the Harry fox claim was an abuse of the copyright laws. (I find the text quoted here : [1]http://www.pdinfo.com/ ) I think it is important to write : Public domain, original source, and to mention the date of publication of the music played (and country too). Valery -Message d'origine- De : [2]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:[3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] De la part de David van Ooijen Envoye : jeudi 5 juillet 2012 16:15 A : [4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Objet : [LUTE] Re: YouTube going too far? On 5 July 2012 16:05, Ron Andrico [5]praelu...@hotmail.com wrote: To make a long story short, the only words Youtube needs to see in response is that the music is in the Public Domain, or the person posting the music is the verified copyright holder. The challenge is then automatically withdrawn. It is not. Because this is the second time YouTube challenges this particular (and not at all popular) video. I'm not in it for the money, but coorperation claiming Greensleeves simply feels wrong. I also post 'fingerstyle covers' of pop songs (I've just recorded Paradise by Sade, early music of sorts. I will upload later today). Obviously these are far more popular, and obviously there are copyright holders involved who claim their share. Fair enough. But Greensleeves ... David -- *** David van Ooijen [6]davidvanooi...@gmail.com www.davidvanooijen.nl *** To get on or off this list see list information at [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.pdinfo.com/ 2. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu 3. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu 4. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 5. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=praelu...@hotmail.com 6. file://localhost/mc/compose?to%c3%9avidvanooi...@gmail.com 7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
