[LUTE] Re: Decisions, decisions

2008-07-01 Thread David Rastall
On Jun 30, 2008, at 11:01 PM, David Tayler wrote:

 Consider a dual purpose instrument.
 An archlute, or a 9 course or 10 course can be dual setup to play  
 in French tuning, either with double strings (archlute) or single  
 strings (9 or 10 course) as well as the original tuning.

Sorry, I'm not following you here.  Can you explain that again?

Thanks,

David R
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Decisions, decisions

2008-06-30 Thread Stuart Walsh

Alan Hoyle wrote:
As retirement, and subsequent reduction of money to spend on luxuries, 
approaches, my wife (or 'wifu', David, but never again 'her indoors') 
has informed me that it should be possible for me to buy one last 
instrument. Realistically, though, I couldn't really go much beyond 
£2000( plus whatever I can get for my 1979 nine-course orpharion, 
which my slightly arthritic wrists, elbows  shoulders cannot manage 
to play now)


At present, I have (in addition to the orpharion) a six-course G lute, 
a six-course G viola da mano, and a seven-course G lute that I built 
some 30 years ago from the Harwood  Isaacs lute kit - no prizes for 
guessing the repertoire that I have been playing.


But now I find myself totally unsure what to choose. For many years I 
have dreamed of one day owning a baroque lute. Would that be a 
sensible choice for a man whose fingers are slowing down (to say 
nothing of his brain!). And if it were a sensible choice, then how 
many courses? The only baroque repertoire that I am at all familiar 
with is Weiss (thanks to Robert Barto) and Bach (thanks to Walter 
Gerwig) - almost certainly too demanding for me to contemplate trying 
to learn. I know nothing of the French 17th century styles, is there 
scope there for an aging novice?


Should I stick to the 'Golden Age', simply moving  from mostly 
pre-1550 to focus more on 1600? And then, once more the question 
arises, how many courses? I know this was discussed a few months ago  
I can go and look in the archives...


Or, should I stick with what I am accustomed to and buy an instrument 
of different character - a vihuela in A, for example, of a lower 
pitched lute in E or F?


Or... should I simply tell my wife, 'No, dear, I really don't need any 
more instruments - I think you should buy yourself a bigger greenhouse'?


I would seriously welcome suggestions and advice.

Alan

  
How about a five-course (Baroque) guitar? I think these might be in your 
price range though modern makers tend to copy only the most ornate 
models from the past  - and charge accordingly.


This will give you a huge repertoire (from the early 17th century right 
into the 18th)  from the familiar (Sanz, De Visee etc ) to... as obscure 
as you want. And you could dabble with continuo and accompany others.


And you can endlessly muse about stringing and tuning.

Stuart






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.3/1524 - Release Date: 28/06/2008 19:42
  




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Decisions, decisions

2008-06-30 Thread sterling price
Hi-If you are interested in the baroque lute, you should get one. You just 
might find the left hand fingerings easier on the fingers than the ren-lute. As 
to the question of how many courses-that should be determined by the music you 
want to play. Get a 13 course if you like Weiss and Bach, or get an 11 course 
if you like early German or French music. If you are not sure, just get a 13 
course and you can cover it all.
Sterling


- Original Message 
From: Alan Hoyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lutelist Net lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 10:39:42 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Decisions, decisions

As retirement, and subsequent reduction of money to spend on luxuries, 
approaches, my wife (or 'wifu', David, but never again 'her indoors') has 
informed me that it should be possible for me to buy one last instrument. 
Realistically, though, I couldn't really go much beyond £2000( plus whatever 
I can get for my 1979 nine-course orpharion, which my slightly arthritic 
wrists, elbows  shoulders cannot manage to play now)

At present, I have (in addition to the orpharion) a six-course G lute, a 
six-course G viola da mano, and a seven-course G lute that I built some 30 
years ago from the Harwood  Isaacs lute kit - no prizes for guessing the 
repertoire that I have been playing.

But now I find myself totally unsure what to choose. For many years I have 
dreamed of one day owning a baroque lute. Would that be a sensible choice 
for a man whose fingers are slowing down (to say nothing of his brain!). And 
if it were a sensible choice, then how many courses? The only baroque 
repertoire that I am at all familiar with is Weiss (thanks to Robert Barto) 
and Bach (thanks to Walter Gerwig) - almost certainly too demanding for me 
to contemplate trying to learn. I know nothing of the French 17th century 
styles, is there scope there for an aging novice?

Should I stick to the 'Golden Age', simply moving  from mostly pre-1550 to 
focus more on 1600? And then, once more the question arises, how many 
courses? I know this was discussed a few months ago  I can go and look in 
the archives...

Or, should I stick with what I am accustomed to and buy an instrument of 
different character - a vihuela in A, for example, of a lower pitched lute 
in E or F?

Or... should I simply tell my wife, 'No, dear, I really don't need any more 
instruments - I think you should buy yourself a bigger greenhouse'?

I would seriously welcome suggestions and advice.

Alan 


-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 3 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html







To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Decisions, decisions

2008-06-30 Thread howard posner
On Jun 30, 2008, at 4:14 PM, sterling price wrote:

 You just might find the left hand fingerings easier on the fingers  
 than the ren-lute.

But be sure your arthritic joints can handle the right-hand  
stretches.  Imagine a few more courses on your nine-course.


--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Decisions, decisions

2008-06-30 Thread David Tayler

Consider a dual purpose instrument.
An archlute, or a 9 course or 10 course can be 
dual setup to play in French tuning, either with 
double strings (archlute) or single strings (9 or 
10 course) as well as the original tuning.
You can also setup the archlute to play in single 
and double, old tuning or D minor tuning.

Weiss on the theorbo in D minor tuning sounds amazing, btw.
dt


At 09:39 AM 6/29/2008, you wrote:
As retirement, and subsequent reduction of money 
to spend on luxuries, approaches, my wife (or 
'wifu', David, but never again 'her indoors') 
has informed me that it should be possible for 
me to buy one last instrument. Realistically, 
though, I couldn't really go much beyond £2000( 
plus whatever I can get for my 1979 nine-course 
orpharion, which my slightly arthritic wrists, 
elbows  shoulders cannot manage to play now)


At present, I have (in addition to the 
orpharion) a six-course G lute, a six-course G 
viola da mano, and a seven-course G lute that I 
built some 30 years ago from the Harwood  
Isaacs lute kit - no prizes for guessing the 
repertoire that I have been playing.


But now I find myself totally unsure what to 
choose. For many years I have dreamed of one day 
owning a baroque lute. Would that be a sensible 
choice for a man whose fingers are slowing down 
(to say nothing of his brain!). And if it were a 
sensible choice, then how many courses? The only 
baroque repertoire that I am at all familiar 
with is Weiss (thanks to Robert Barto) and Bach 
(thanks to Walter Gerwig) - almost certainly too 
demanding for me to contemplate trying to learn. 
I know nothing of the French 17th century 
styles, is there scope there for an aging novice?


Should I stick to the 'Golden Age', simply 
moving  from mostly pre-1550 to focus more on 
1600? And then, once more the question arises, 
how many courses? I know this was discussed a 
few months ago  I can go and look in the archives...


Or, should I stick with what I am accustomed to 
and buy an instrument of different character - a 
vihuela in A, for example, of a lower pitched lute in E or F?


Or... should I simply tell my wife, 'No, dear, I 
really don't need any more instruments - I think 
you should buy yourself a bigger greenhouse'?


I would seriously welcome suggestions and advice.

Alan

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 3 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html