Re: Scanning, challenging

2019-02-09 Thread Andrew Pam via luv-main
On 10/2/19 6:39 pm, Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote:
> FFS!  If systemd confined itself to just doing init and didn't assimilate or
> infect everything else withing reach, I wouldn't have a problem with it.  But
> this shit really makes me hate it.

The Tragedy of systemd
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_AIw9bGogo

Share and enjoy,
Andrew
___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Re: Scanning, challenging

2019-02-09 Thread Craig Sanders via luv-main
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 03:50:30PM +1100, Mark Trickett wrote:
> As i have mentioned, I have an Agfa SnapScan, and it appears to have
> died. I have bought a new scanner, and checked compatibility with the sane
> website. The Canon CanoScan LiDE 120 is listed as supported, but with
> scanimage 1.0.27, while the up to date scanimage on Debian 9.7 is 1.0.25.

the sane-utils (v 1.0.27) package in debian sid has the following dependencies:

Depends: adduser, lsb-base (>= 3.0-6), update-inetd, debconf (>= 0.5) | 
debconf-2.0,
 libavahi-client3 (>= 0.6.16), libavahi-common3 (>= 0.6.16),
 libc6 (>= 2.15), libieee1284-3, libjpeg62-turbo (>= 1.3.1),
 libpng16-16 (>= 1.6.2-1), libsane (>= 1.0.27), libsystemd0,
 libusb-1.0-0 (>= 2:1.0.8)

libsane 1.0.27 doesn't have any dependencies.

As long as the other installed library packages are at least equal to the
versions mentioned above, you should be able to just download the .deb files
for sane-utils and libsane and install them with dpkg.  If not, download and
update them (and any of THEIR dependencies) before installing sane-utils.

i.e. download the following from your nearest debian mirror:

.../debian/pool/main/s/sane-backends/libsane_1.0.27-3.1_amd64.deb
.../debian/pool/main/s/sane-backends/sane-utils_1.0.27-3.1_amd64.deb

and install them (as root) with:

dpkg -iBE libsane_1.0.27-3.1_amd64.deb sane-utils_1.0.27-3.1_amd64.deb


(or _i386.deb if you're running on an ancient CPU)




Alternatively, download the debianised source for sane-utils and rebuild for
debian 9.  i.e. make your own backport.


craig

PS: I note that systemd has spread its monstrous tentacles even into userland
apps like sane-utils.  This is why systemd is a menace - it's already nearly
impossible to avoid and will soon be **actually** impossible for distros that
went down the systemd path of insanity to ever disentangle themselves from
RedHat's linux takeover bid.

FFS!  If systemd confined itself to just doing init and didn't assimilate or
infect everything else withing reach, I wouldn't have a problem with it.  But
this shit really makes me hate it.

--
craig sanders 
___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Re: Scanning, challenging

2019-02-09 Thread Mark Trickett via luv-main
Hello Andrew,

On 2/10/19, Andrew Greig via luv-main  wrote:
>
> On 10/2/19 4:25 pm, Mark Trickett via luv-main wrote:

Snip

> Sorry Mark,
>
>
> There is more, we have steak knives.
>
> Use AirDroid to transfer data from the HuaWei to your Linux Box, app on the
> phone (D/L the app over wi-fi) and web Interface on the Linux box. A QR code
> on the Linux Box is scanned by the AirDroid app on the phone and connects
> the two devices, very slick.

Read again, not having connectivity. I am transferring image files by
USB stick, when I can. I tried to set up bluetooth, but issues with
the computer end. Also the tablet is very frustrating. Quality is not
there, built to a price, not a standard, reminds me of Tony Abbot, in
a very bad way.

Have been reading and reading. Someone has had problems, then it just
worked with Ubuntu 17.10, but may have carried over a PPA from the
previous version when he upgraded (not a clean install).

Another clue might be that the USB printer kernel driver may be
preventing scanimage from seeing the scanner. I can look at
blacklisting the kernel module, but then may need to undo and reboot
if I set up a USB connected printer, and have to choose between
printing and scanning. That will get resolved, eventually.

Regards,

Mark Trickett
___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Re: Scanning, challenging

2019-02-09 Thread Andrew Greig via luv-main

  
  


On 10/2/19 4:25 pm, Mark Trickett via
  luv-main wrote:


  Hello Andrew,

On 2/10/19, Andrew Greig via luv-main  wrote:


  
Hi Mark,

Canon, with a lot of Linux drivers for their printers and scanners, normally
has a link on their website to the OpenSource drivers, try the Canon Website
for your product and you may find the link you need.

Andrew Greig

  
  
Did a google search and looking at the Canon Europe page, "Available
Drivers (0)" which matches other material, all talking about sane and
scanimage and versions thereof for Linux and BSD related systems.

It looks like 1.0.27 is still in testing, and I am not looking to go
there, at least at this time. In the meantime, I am photographing
essential documents with a good Pentax digital camera, then cropping
and altering the white and shadow balance. I have an old Nokia classic
phone, but jiggle too much when trying to photograph with that. I also
have a Huawei android phone with no sim, and a Telstra cheap Android
tablet, again no sim. Getting a photo off the Huawei is "difficult",
and the cheap Telstra tablet is very difficult to get to respond to
the screen presses, getting it to take the photo can be a frustrating
hour, and still no image. I know why it has such a poor reputation.

Regards,

Mark Trickett
___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Sorry Mark,


There is more, we have steak knives. 

Use AirDroid to transfer data from the HuaWei to your Linux Box,
  app on the phone (D/L the app over wi-fi) and web Interface on the
  Linux box. A QR code on the Linux Box is scanned by the AirDroid
  app on the phone and connects the two devices, very slick.
Andrew

Andrew

  

___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Re: Scanning, challenging

2019-02-09 Thread Andrew Greig via luv-main

  
  


On 10/2/19 4:25 pm, Mark Trickett via
  luv-main wrote:


  Hello Andrew,

On 2/10/19, Andrew Greig via luv-main  wrote:


  
Hi Mark,

Canon, with a lot of Linux drivers for their printers and scanners, normally
has a link on their website to the OpenSource drivers, try the Canon Website
for your product and you may find the link you need.

Andrew Greig

  
  
Did a google search and looking at the Canon Europe page, "Available
Drivers (0)" which matches other material, all talking about sane and
scanimage and versions thereof for Linux and BSD related systems.

It looks like 1.0.27 is still in testing, and I am not looking to go
there, at least at this time. In the meantime, I am photographing
essential documents with a good Pentax digital camera, then cropping
and altering the white and shadow balance. I have an old Nokia classic
phone, but jiggle too much when trying to photograph with that. I also
have a Huawei android phone with no sim, and a Telstra cheap Android
tablet, again no sim. Getting a photo off the Huawei is "difficult",
and the cheap Telstra tablet is very difficult to get to respond to
the screen presses, getting it to take the photo can be a frustrating
hour, and still no image. I know why it has such a poor reputation.

Regards,

Mark Trickett
___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Hi Mark,
Given that you are equipped with Android gear, I recommend that
  you D/L the CamScanner app. It uses the camera and after the
  initial scan will correct keystone and save a a pdf (much better
  than a jpg or png), if you buy the paid version it will index the
  pages using a cloud based ocr feature, it is quick and excellent
  and I use it when I am away from my trusty Epson GT7000S (SCSI).
  The benefit of the ocr and indexing for you is that if you can
  remember what your topic was you could have a stab at a key-word
  and it will find it quickly for you.
Andrew

  

___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Re: Scanning, challenging

2019-02-09 Thread Mark Trickett via luv-main
Hello Andrew,

On 2/10/19, Andrew Greig via luv-main  wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> Canon, with a lot of Linux drivers for their printers and scanners, normally
> has a link on their website to the OpenSource drivers, try the Canon Website
> for your product and you may find the link you need.
>
> Andrew Greig

Did a google search and looking at the Canon Europe page, "Available
Drivers (0)" which matches other material, all talking about sane and
scanimage and versions thereof for Linux and BSD related systems.

It looks like 1.0.27 is still in testing, and I am not looking to go
there, at least at this time. In the meantime, I am photographing
essential documents with a good Pentax digital camera, then cropping
and altering the white and shadow balance. I have an old Nokia classic
phone, but jiggle too much when trying to photograph with that. I also
have a Huawei android phone with no sim, and a Telstra cheap Android
tablet, again no sim. Getting a photo off the Huawei is "difficult",
and the cheap Telstra tablet is very difficult to get to respond to
the screen presses, getting it to take the photo can be a frustrating
hour, and still no image. I know why it has such a poor reputation.

Regards,

Mark Trickett
___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Re: Scanning, challenging

2019-02-09 Thread Andrew Greig via luv-main

  
  


On 10/2/19 3:50 pm, Mark Trickett via
  luv-main wrote:


  Hello All,

As i have mentioned, I have an Agfa SnapScan, and it appears to have
died. I have bought a new scanner, and checked compatibility with the
sane website. The Canon CanoScan LiDE 120 is listed as supported, but
with scanimage 1.0.27, while the up to date scanimage on Debian 9.7 is
1.0.25.

I do have the backports enabled for APT and Synaptic, but it appears
to not yet have been backported. I have found some mixed comments on
the LinuxQuestions.org website, but from mid 2017, so the cautions may
no longer apply.

I would appreciate any comments and suggestions from this community.

Regards,

Mark Trickett
___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Hi Mark,
Canon, with a lot of Linux drivers for their printers and
  scanners, normally has a link on their website to the OpenSource
  drivers, try the Canon Website for your product and you may find
  the link you need.
Andrew Greig

  

___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Scanning, challenging

2019-02-09 Thread Mark Trickett via luv-main
Hello All,

As i have mentioned, I have an Agfa SnapScan, and it appears to have
died. I have bought a new scanner, and checked compatibility with the
sane website. The Canon CanoScan LiDE 120 is listed as supported, but
with scanimage 1.0.27, while the up to date scanimage on Debian 9.7 is
1.0.25.

I do have the backports enabled for APT and Synaptic, but it appears
to not yet have been backported. I have found some mixed comments on
the LinuxQuestions.org website, but from mid 2017, so the cautions may
no longer apply.

I would appreciate any comments and suggestions from this community.

Regards,

Mark Trickett
___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main


Peer to peer network-based file systems

2019-02-09 Thread Jason White via luv-main
I've been reading about IPFS (https://www.ipfs.io/), and I'm becoming 
interested in these emerging peer to peer technologies.



Suppose that I want to share files among several of my machines, with 
synchronization of files/directories, but without a server/client 
arrangement. Encrypted network communication is also desirable, and none 
of the data should reside on anyone else's hardware. For convenience, 
modifying a file on one machine should result in changes eventually 
being distributed to the others as automatically as possible.



Are there good options at this point? If so, what are the trade-offs and 
best implementations?



This is partly a matter of curiosity, but if there's a good solution, I 
would be interested in trying it.



___
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main