Re: [lwip-users] Subnet too large?

[goldsi...@gmx.de]

This is totally off-topic to this thread... :-)

Stephen Cowell wrote:

Sorry... I was under the impression that the subject line determined the
thread.


A thread is defined by the email's headers (readable by programs), not 
the subject (human readable).



I'm using Thunderbird and I don't see any difference from this end.


Right clicking a mail, my thunderbird shows something like "show 
threaded view" (freely translated from german :)



I assume to create a new mail I address it to lwip-users@nongnu.org?
That's what I thought I did.


Hitting the response button is a different thing to hitting the "new 
mail" button. You might not know that or see it in your email client, 
but when hitting the reply button, the email gets marked as belonging to 
the same thread as the mail you replied to.


Simon

___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] Subnet too large?

[Stephen Cowell]

Sorry... I was under the impression that the subject line determined the 
thread.  I'm using Thunderbird and I don't see any difference from this end.


I assume to create a new mail I address it to lwip-users@nongnu.org?  
That's what I thought I did.

__
Steve
.

On 3/16/2017 1:12 PM, goldsimon wrote:
Please don't hijack a thread but ensure you create a new one for a new 
topic by creating a new mail instead of hitting the reply button and 
changing the subject.


Thanks,
Simon


Am 16. März 2017 17:15:01 MEZ schrieb Stephen Cowell 
:


We're having some problems with a customer... we have over a hundred of
our lwIP 1.4.1 devices out in the field.

Our hardware is the Atmel ATSAME416E with the KSZ8081MNX PHY chip...
same config as the ATSAM4E_EK eval kit.

Project based on the THIRDPARTY_LWIP_RAW_BASIC_HTTP example.. I've added
FTPD, HSMCI, and SNTP to the mix.  The box is an FTP site for an SD card
attached to industrial equipment.

Our customer is experiencing lockup of the processor... the lockup
symptom is the status LED stays BLUE.  At this condition we're supposed
to quit kicking the watchdog, resulting in a reset... obviously this is
not happening, not sure why.

The unusual thing about this customer's installation is that they have a
huge subnet... the mask is FF.FF.F0.00... 4094 hosts.  This appears to
me to be way too much, but our other pieces on this network (Lantronix
Spider-based) appear to be able to take this load.  I'm assuming there's
a lot of horsepower in the Spider, it gets pretty hot in operation,
where our board runs cool.

Should lwIP be able to handle this, given my current hardware?  I
realize this is more a hardware question than a lwIP question, but
perhaps someone can help me.  Thanks for your time.
__
Steve
.



lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users


___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

[lwip-users] Subnet too large?

[Stephen Cowell]

We're having some problems with a customer... we have over a hundred of 
our lwIP 1.4.1 devices out in the field.


Our hardware is the Atmel ATSAME416E with the KSZ8081MNX PHY chip... 
same config as the ATSAM4E_EK eval kit.


Project based on the THIRDPARTY_LWIP_RAW_BASIC_HTTP example.. I've added 
FTPD, HSMCI, and SNTP to the mix.  The box is an FTP site for an SD card 
attached to industrial equipment.


Our customer is experiencing lockup of the processor... the lockup 
symptom is the status LED stays BLUE.  At this condition we're supposed 
to quit kicking the watchdog, resulting in a reset... obviously this is 
not happening, not sure why.


The unusual thing about this customer's installation is that they have a 
huge subnet... the mask is FF.FF.F0.00... 4094 hosts.  This appears to 
me to be way too much, but our other pieces on this network (Lantronix 
Spider-based) appear to be able to take this load.  I'm assuming there's 
a lot of horsepower in the Spider, it gets pretty hot in operation, 
where our board runs cool.


Should lwIP be able to handle this, given my current hardware?  I 
realize this is more a hardware question than a lwIP question, but 
perhaps someone can help me.  Thanks for your time.

__
Steve
.

___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users