On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 03:23 -0400, CDR wrote:
I did a git pull and ´when I issued a make rpm, it failed
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service
RPM build errors:
File listed twice:
/usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/_lxc-0.1-py3.3.egg-info
File listed twice: /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/_lxc.cpython-33m.so
File listed twice: /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__init__.py
File listed twice: /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__
File listed twice:
/usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-33.pyc
File listed twice:
/usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-33.pyo
File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-autostart-helper
File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-devsetup
File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-user-nic
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service
make: *** [rpm] Error 1
Any idea how can I compile the software?
You raised this issue on 08/09 for 1.1.0alpha1 under Fedora 20. At that
time yours was the second report and I was already looking into it. You
then raised the issue again on the -devel list on 09/05 for 1.1.0alpha1
under CentOS 7 - exact same issue. At that time the patches had already
been submitted on 08/25 to Stéphane and were then under review. I
responded to you to that effect on 09/09 along with the reason for the
original failure and a pointer to my patches that had been posted to the
list.
The patches are still being reviewed as he's been exceptionally busy
lately and the patches are fairly involved and involved some
disagreements in approach which were discussed in private E-Mail between
the involved parties.
The patches have not been committed to git master to date and he's
working on integrating the changes. As a consequence, the answer I gave
to you on 09/09 on the -devel list remains the same and is equally
applicable to 1.1.0alpha1 and to git master...
i.e. ... You can either apply the patches I posted to the -devel list
several weeks ago or you can wait for Stéphane to commit the fully
integrated patches to git master. At this time, applying my changes
will result in some patch warnings due to others submitting some warning
changes in parallel patches.
I would recommend monitoring the -devel list for further (cough)
developments (yes, pun intended).
Regards,
Mike
On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 12:06 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
This was due to a refactoring of the upstart init network code nearly
a
month ago by someone, AFAIK, not currently on the list which created
some files in an incorrect location and the creation of dependencies
on
it in the systemd code. Patches for this fax paux have been submitted
by me and Stéphane is currently evaluating my patch set to correct the
problems that were created by the earlier submission by another that
inadvertently broke all the rpm based systems. This was reported
several weeks ago and I submitted my fix, after some private
discussion,
on 08/25.
Please review the following thread, starting on 08/25/2014, on this
list
for the patches and some discussion...
Thanks,
Philip
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-us...@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0x674627FF| possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
