Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching google in basic html with lynx.

2021-10-16 Thread Mouse
> I don't have persistent cookies on lynx, and the gmail login page
> requires javascript.

That does not match my experience.  Maybe it's because my work account
is already set up to use the basic HTML view, but unless it's changed
in the last week or so I've been able to log in fine without JS.

This is not to gmail proper, though, but to a small-company mail system
hosted on Google's infrastructure.  I don't know whether that
distinction makes any difference here.

They _do_, annoyingly, send me a mail each time I log in incorrectly
claiming that I've logged in from a new Linux device - no, it's the
same Linux device I've been using for years.  But that is a minor
annoyance as compared to having to use their webmail at all (which I
have to because they claim my mail fetcher is too insecure, as if that
weren't my choice to make - and without, of course, any indication what
they consider secure enough, what hoops they would want my client to
jump through before they'd let me fetch mail with it).

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B



Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching google in basic html with lynx.

2021-10-16 Thread Zachary Lee Andrews

On Sat, 16 Oct 2021, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Doesn't work in what way for you?
The link does not activate, it does not produce the desired results, which?
Google actually fixed the older basic html link I personally used to use for 
this.
That being said, unless you have google account cookies in your lynx file 
that previously let you reach your gmail account or google account in lynx, 
it may not work either.

Kare


I don't have persistent cookies on lynx, and the gmail login page requires 
javascript.


--
 Zachary Lee Andrews




Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching google in basic html with lynx.

2021-10-16 Thread Karen Lewellen

Hi Travis,
Making sure your reply reaches the list.  there may be others who wondered 
as I did.

anyone know of an example of what Travis means here?
I  used google to search for years without needing an account, only 
getting one as a way to  manage files as outlined.
that, and for research, my second address, which I can no longer reach 
directly because of Google's claim that only  hackers turn off JavaScript.

Kare



On Sat, 16 Oct 2021, Travis Siegel wrote:

Honestly, I can't remember who wanted me to have the gmail address, but I do 
remember it irritated me to no end.  It may have been one (or more) of the 
various private label rights softwares I've purchased over the years, or it 
may even have been google itself, since everytime you connect to it (if it's 
the default search engine in your browser), it always asks you to login, and 
the stupid login screen kept getting in the way, and sometimes caused me to 
loos my place on the web page, so I finally gave in, setup a google mail 
account, then ignored it entirely.  I have no idea if I ever got any email 
to that account or not, and I don't even know what the password is to log 
back into it if chrome ever forgets the password, but honestly I don't care, 
because I have no intention of ever using it.


I have my own email addresses, and don't need another one just because some 
stupid website wanted me to have it.


On 10/16/2021 9:09 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:

 Hi Travis,
 I am curious.  can you share examples of sites that require a gmail
 account?
 And yet do not need you to confirm anything by sending you an email to
 that account?
 Speaking personally, the basic html edition of gmail is profoundly needful
 for me, especially as  often things like pdf attachments get
 automatically converted to html, and in lynx become plan text.  Same for
 word and docx files.
 still, I am  personally   unaware of a site that requires the use of
 gmail, the option to sign up with your gmail account, yes, but not an
 actual mandate.
 Do you mind sharing your experiences with this?
 Karen



 On Sat, 16 Oct 2021, Travis Siegel wrote:

>  For what it's worth, when I clicked on that link, it brought me to the 
>  google page, and asked me if I was sure I wanted to turn on the html 
>  only (or whatever it was) feature of gmail.  I have a gmail account 
>  only because some sites require it.  I have never once actually checked 
>  said mail, and never plan to.
> 
>  But, it did work.
> 
>  On 10/16/2021 4:30 AM, Bela Lubkin wrote:

> > >   On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > > >   Sharing this, in case it helps others.
> > > > > >   -- Forwarded message --
> > > >   Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:51:07 +
> > > > > >  https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/1pq68r75kzvdr/?v%3Dlui
> >   Zachary Lee Andrews replied:
> > 
> > >   Am I missing something, the only thing I see in your message is a 
> >  gmail

> > >   URL that doesn't work...
> >   Right, gmail URLs are per-person.  mail.google.com/mail/u/0 is the
> >   mailbox of *your* primary logged-in google ID.  For anyone else, 
> >  that

> >   URL means 'the message with this hash key in *my* mailbox', which is
> >   vanishingly unlikely to exist; and if it did, it wouldn't be the 
> >  same

> >   message anyway.
> > 
> >   If you want to forward text out of a gmail message, you need to 
> >  forward

> >   the text, not a gmail URL...
> > 
> > >   Bela<
> >   PS: apologies to Zachary for mistakenly sending 1st copy of this to 
> >  him
> > 
> 
> 






Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching google in basic html with lynx.

2021-10-16 Thread Karen Lewellen

Hi Travis,
I am curious.  can you share examples of sites that require a gmail 
account?
And yet do not need you to confirm anything by sending you an email to 
that account?
Speaking personally, the basic html edition of gmail is profoundly needful 
for me, especially as  often things like pdf attachments get 
automatically converted to html, and in lynx become plan text.  Same for 
word and docx files.
still, I am  personally   unaware of a site that requires the use of 
gmail, the option to sign up with your gmail account, yes, but not an 
actual mandate.

Do you mind sharing your experiences with this?
Karen



On Sat, 16 Oct 2021, Travis Siegel wrote:

For what it's worth, when I clicked on that link, it brought me to the google 
page, and asked me if I was sure I wanted to turn on the html only (or 
whatever it was) feature of gmail.  I have a gmail account only because some 
sites require it.  I have never once actually checked said mail, and never 
plan to.


But, it did work.

On 10/16/2021 4:30 AM, Bela Lubkin wrote:

>  On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >  Sharing this, in case it helps others.
> > 
> >  -- Forwarded message --

> >  Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:51:07 +
> > 
> >  https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/1pq68r75kzvdr/?v%3Dlui

 Zachary Lee Andrews replied:

>  Am I missing something, the only thing I see in your message is a gmail
>  URL that doesn't work...
 Right, gmail URLs are per-person.  mail.google.com/mail/u/0 is the
 mailbox of *your* primary logged-in google ID.  For anyone else, that
 URL means 'the message with this hash key in *my* mailbox', which is
 vanishingly unlikely to exist; and if it did, it wouldn't be the same
 message anyway.

 If you want to forward text out of a gmail message, you need to forward
 the text, not a gmail URL...

>  Bela<
 PS: apologies to Zachary for mistakenly sending 1st copy of this to him






Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching google in basic html with lynx.

2021-10-16 Thread Karen Lewellen

On Sat, 16 Oct 2021, Zachary Lee Andrews wrote:





Hi,

Am I missing something, the only thing I see in your message is a gmail URL 
that doesn't work...


Doesn't work in what way for you?
The link does not activate, it does not produce the desired results, 
which?
Google actually fixed the older basic html link I personally used to use 
for this.
That being said, unless you have google account cookies in your lynx file 
that previously let you reach your gmail account or google account in 
lynx, it may not work either.

Kare




Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching google in basic html with lynx.

2021-10-16 Thread Travis Siegel
For what it's worth, when I clicked on that link, it brought me to the 
google page, and asked me if I was sure I wanted to turn on the html 
only (or whatever it was) feature of gmail.  I have a gmail account only 
because some sites require it.  I have never once actually checked said 
mail, and never plan to.


But, it did work.

On 10/16/2021 4:30 AM, Bela Lubkin wrote:

On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, Karen Lewellen wrote:

Sharing this, in case it helps others.

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:51:07 +

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/1pq68r75kzvdr/?v%3Dlui

Zachary Lee Andrews replied:


Am I missing something, the only thing I see in your message is a gmail
URL that doesn't work...

Right, gmail URLs are per-person.  mail.google.com/mail/u/0 is the
mailbox of *your* primary logged-in google ID.  For anyone else, that
URL means 'the message with this hash key in *my* mailbox', which is
vanishingly unlikely to exist; and if it did, it wouldn't be the same
message anyway.

If you want to forward text out of a gmail message, you need to forward
the text, not a gmail URL...


Bela<

PS: apologies to Zachary for mistakenly sending 1st copy of this to him





Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching google in basic html with lynx.

2021-10-16 Thread Bela Lubkin
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >
> > Sharing this, in case it helps others.
> >
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:51:07 +
> >
> > https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/1pq68r75kzvdr/?v%3Dlui

Zachary Lee Andrews replied:

> Am I missing something, the only thing I see in your message is a gmail
> URL that doesn't work...

Right, gmail URLs are per-person.  mail.google.com/mail/u/0 is the
mailbox of *your* primary logged-in google ID.  For anyone else, that
URL means 'the message with this hash key in *my* mailbox', which is
vanishingly unlikely to exist; and if it did, it wouldn't be the same
message anyway.

If you want to forward text out of a gmail message, you need to forward
the text, not a gmail URL...

>Bela<

PS: apologies to Zachary for mistakenly sending 1st copy of this to him