Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-11 Thread David Woolley

On 11/11/2019 22:12, Bela Lubkin wrote:

Note that in US law, and I believe EU and probably many other
jurisdictions, there are legal requirements for software accessibility.
The positions you describe seem very likely to be in violation (but I am
not at all a lawyer...)



Law is the only way that companies in the normal market will consider 
accessibility.  Even if the OP weren't product, rather than customer, 
companies would apply an 80/20 rule, if operating in a free market, and 
ignore the 20% of the market that is most difficult to service.


However, even with law, and even on W3C's own accessibility forums, most 
companies and consultants consider that "works with JAWS" is a 
sufficient test of accessibility.  I found it interesting that someone 
said that JAWS wasn't much used even on Windows, but it is the standard 
that businesses use.


Programs like elinks don't implement Javascript even close to fully, but 
these days a standard, full implementation, is considered an acceptable 
target by content developers, even those interested in accessibility.  I 
think early version of the W3C Web Content Accessibilty Guidelines 
discouraged scripting, but the current ones consider it acceptable.


The only real way of getting a text mode browser to work for everything 
designed for that environment, and with accessibility in mind, would 
probably be to start with Firefox, etc., and rewrite its final rendering 
for character cell displays.  Even that might not be enough.


It disappoints me, but consultants have to come up with solutions that 
fit in with their customers' wants, not just consumer needs.


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-11 Thread Bela Lubkin
Karen Lewellen wrote:

> In October 2018, a senior staff member at google stated that since only
> crooks turned off JavaScript, Google was starting to use their own
> proprietary edition which among other things is supposed to detect the
> presence of adaptive technology for recaptcha, and track specifics
> about your account access .  i can share  the link to that article, or
> you can likely find the reference by doing a search for the term
> "google will not let you log into your account without JavaScript."

Please share the reference.  Share everything you've got, with
closest-to-source methods (URL to original post, for instance; not
copy-paste quotes disassociated from their sources).

> Additionally, when I first discovered that some Linux associated
> browsers, Links and Elinks, which can be compiled with a form of
> JavaScript, but which no longer work to log into gmail, I was told by
> Thomas, a member of Google's accessibility team, that these browsers
> did not use the "right kind" of JavaScript.

Of all of your communications with Google, this seems to be the only
thing they said which was true.  Jimmying a JavaScript / DOM
implementation into a text-mode browser is nearly impossible and it is
not at all surprising that the version in [e]links does not meet the
requirements.  Of course, Google *could* modify their code to succeed in
that environment, if they wanted to, but we see where that leads...

> Some of the articles I find speak of a more open source form of
> JavaScript, which some Linux developers use, but which now Google will
> not permit.

I haven't seen those articles so I don't have the correct context, but
it seems to me this will again be about functional compatibility, not
about Google intentionally blocking those things.  A bolted-on-the-side
JS/DOM implementation inside a text browser is inherently going to be
pretty different from a modern graphical browser; it would probably need
to be intentionally supported.

> Granted, I still have a post from the google accessibility team where a
> member claimed that a person should not expect to use the same adaptive
> tools they could before.
>
> Given how often adaptive technology serves as a substitute for a persons
> hands, or brain, or eyes, that attitude seems disturbing.

Quite.

If you're talking about a public post, please share.  If it's from a
mailing list or private email, consider whether you should publish it
anyway.  These are disturbing positions for a company like Google to
take.  I would expect that it's much more a case of an individual
Googler talking out his ass, than an official corporate position.
Perhaps the person who 'owns' the bug inside Google doesn't feel like
expending the effort.  Publishing it might light a fire under their ass
to fix it (I hear Twitter is a good venue for this sort of thing).

Note that in US law, and I believe EU and probably many other
jurisdictions, there are legal requirements for software accessibility.
The positions you describe seem very likely to be in violation (but I am
not at all a lawyer...)

>Bela<

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-11 Thread Mouse
> In October 2018, a senior staff member at google stated that since
> only crooks turned off JavaScript, Google was starting to use their
> own proprietary edition which among other things is supposed to
> detect the presence of adaptive technology for recaptcha,

That "senior staff member" either doesn't understand JavaScript or
hopes other people don't.

A proprietary version of JavaScript does not make sense unless the
producing entity - Google, in this case - controls both ends, here
meaning both the webserver side and the browser side.  See below.

> Additionally, when I first discovered that some Linux associated
> browsers, Links and Elinks, which can be compiled with a form of
> JavaScript, but which no longer work to log into gmail, I was told by
> Thomas, a member of Google's accessibility team, that these browsers
> did not use the "right kind" of JavaScript.

Again, Thomas either does not understand JavaScript or hopes you don't.
There is, in principle, no way for Google to tell whether the browser
is, say, Firefox, or something else pretending to be Firefox, not as
long as they're conforming to the JavaScript spec enough to
interoperate with implementations other than their own.

> Some of the articles I find speak of a more open source form of
> JavaScript, which some Linux developers use, but which now Google
> will not permit.

Google is not in a position to do that, unless they are going to deny
access to all Web browsers not built by Google - or at least not
running Google implementations of their language (which then isn't
really JavaScript any longer).

What Google is counting on here is that non-"approved" JavaScript
implementations are not actively trying to defeat whtaever
fingerprinting Google is doing.  It leads directly to an arms race
between Google trying to fingerprint implementations and
implementations trying to pretend.  The endgame would be something like
a browser running a Firefox instance in a sandbox and never displaying
the results directly, only presenting what it wants to to the user.
Lynx, even, could do that, if anyone wanted to bother putting in the
(significant) effort to make it do so.

> in short Google is defining JavaScript in such a way so as to allow
> only their tracking features to function so to speak.

Google is not in a position to redefine JavaScript - unless, as I said
above, they always control both ends, in which case they have no need
to use JavaScript at all and can just use something completely
unrelated and better tuned to their purposes.  This is because the
essence of JavaScript is that it's all about the webserver providing
code for the browser to run; JavaScript is a language for such code to
be written in.  For it to work at all, both ends have to agree on the
language, so one end unilaterally redefining it can't work.

As for accessibility in general, well, Google has only minor reason to
care about accessibility.  As a gmail user, you are not a Google
customer; you are part of Google's product (the customers are the
advertisers), and if the cost of supporting your continuing to be part
of Google's product exceeds the benefit - to Google, not to you - then
they have not only an incentive but a duty (to their shareholders) to
drop that support.

Unless you're actually paying Google for your mailbox and access, in
which case it depends on how much you're paying them and what the terms
of the contract are.  Based on just what I've read, though, I'd guess
that even in that case your having managed to get through to a real
person makes you a net money loser to them.

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-11 Thread Karen Lewellen
You would be incorrect, at least based on both what  google staff have 
told me personally, and the public.
In October 2018, a senior staff member at google stated that  since only 
crooks  turned off JavaScript, Google was starting to use their own 
proprietary  edition which among other things is supposed to detect the 
presence  of adaptive technology for recaptcha,  and track  specifics 
about your account 
access .  i can share  the link to that article, or  you  can likely find 
the   reference   by doing a search for the term "google will not let you 
log into your account without JavaScript."
Additionally, when I first discovered that some Linux  associated 
browsers, Links and Elinks, which can be compiled with a form of 
JavaScript, but which no longer work to log into gmail, I was told by 
Thomas, a member of 
Google's accessibility team, that these browsers did not use the "right 
kind" of JavaScript.  In short, the development Google is now using to 
track  users more directly.
Some of the articles I find speak of a more  open source form of 
JavaScript, which some Linux developers  use, but which now Google will 
not permit.  in short Google is defining JavaScript in such a way so as to 
allow  only their  tracking features  to function so to speak.
I  am going to likely use the wrong term for this design concept, but 
Google's new idea of JavaScript also  goes against the concept of 
progressive development, where  a site builds upon  HTML,  so that more 
tools can reach and utilize site services.
Granted, I still have a post from the google accessibility team where a 
member  claimed that  a person should not expect to use the same adaptive 
tools they could before.
Given how often adaptive technology serves as a substitute for a persons 
hands,  or brain, or eyes, that attitude seems disturbing.
Still Google is choosing to  define things different from industry 
standard.  Otherwise  a greater degree of progressive development would 
be in place now.
Oh, and if a current discussion on the Google accessibility list is 
correct, come January, even Jaws will no longer be supported, with Google 
requiring you to use  their voice box software.

So much for Google mirroring the  industry standard.
 Just my thoughts,

 Karen


On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, David Woolley wrote:


On 09/11/2019 04:00, Karen Lewellen wrote:

 The thing is that roads seem to lead to the service log in page which
 rejects that which does not match?? google's concept of JavaScript.


Although Javascript is loose terminology, which only really applies to the 
early Netscape implementation, I doubt that Google's concept of Javascript 
differs from the current industry understanding of it.


Javascript is a combination of a programming language and object models for 
both the browser and the document.  Lynx definitely could not fully implement 
the last of these, as it's internal model of the document is fundamentally 
different from the model that the current HTML standards imply.  However, I 
imagine your problem is more with the browser model.



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-11 Thread Jude DaShiell
Good, I'm glad something works.

On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:57:31
> From: Karen Lewellen 
> To: Jude DaShiell 
> Cc: Travis Siegel , Bela Lubkin ,
> lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
>
> Hi there,
> While I did not personally try this, I located someone who uses edbrowse
> daily.  They performed the test and indicated  that indeed the link works. so
> does  visiting  say mail.google.com/mail and logging into ones account,
> choosing basic html that way.  The link does save a step I am told.
>
> kare
>
>
>
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> > has anyone tried running edbrowse followed by a space and followed by that
> > url yet?  I didn't do that yet but edbrowse will open urls directly that
> > way.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Lynx-dev mailing list
> > Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> >
>

-- 


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-11 Thread David Woolley

On 09/11/2019 04:00, Karen Lewellen wrote:
The thing is that roads seem to lead to the service log in page which 
rejects that which does not match  google's concept of JavaScript.


Although Javascript is loose terminology, which only really applies to 
the early Netscape implementation, I doubt that Google's concept of 
Javascript differs from the current industry understanding of it.


Javascript is a combination of a programming language and object models 
for both the browser and the document.  Lynx definitely could not fully 
implement the last of these, as it's internal model of the document is 
fundamentally different from the model that the current HTML standards 
imply.  However, I imagine your problem is more with the browser model.



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-11 Thread Karen Lewellen

Hi there,
While I did not personally try this, I located someone who uses edbrowse 
daily.  They performed the test and indicated  that indeed the link works. 
so  does  visiting  say mail.google.com/mail and logging into ones 
account, choosing basic html that way.  The link does save a step I am 
told.


kare



On Sat, 9 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


has anyone tried running edbrowse followed by a space and followed by that
url yet?  I didn't do that yet but edbrowse will open urls directly that
way.



--


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-09 Thread Jude DaShiell
has anyone tried running edbrowse followed by a space and followed by that
url yet?  I didn't do that yet but edbrowse will open urls directly that
way.



--


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-09 Thread Travis Siegel
Heh, thought it was worth a shot, but it didn't work for me on my server, 
(haven't tried the windows version of lynx yet). I get the same javascript 
error message as before *grumble*
This makes me want to install squirrelmail on my own server, so I can 
access my email via the web (not that I'd bother very often, but to have 
the capability) 


On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Bela Lubkin wrote:


Tim Chase wrote:


At least according to Google's support page

https://support.google.com/mail/answer/15049?hl=en

you should be able to go to this link

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/1pq68r75kzvdr/?v%3Dlui

to force the HTML/low-bandwidth mode (hopefully a little easier than
trying to intercept the refresh).


The *other* link in that post has '?nocheckbrowser' at the end; I wonder
if that would help get past the insistence on JS with the low-bandwidth
link:

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/?v=lui

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Karen Lewellen

That new link was an interesting test.
The thing is that roads seem to lead to the service log in page which 
rejects that which does not match  google's concept of JavaScript.

Part of why I desire Aljander's exact recent steps.
Kare



On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Bela Lubkin wrote:


Tim Chase wrote:


At least according to Google's support page

https://support.google.com/mail/answer/15049?hl=en

you should be able to go to this link

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/1pq68r75kzvdr/?v%3Dlui

to force the HTML/low-bandwidth mode (hopefully a little easier than
trying to intercept the refresh).


The *other* link in that post has '?nocheckbrowser' at the end; I wonder
if that would help get past the insistence on JS with the low-bandwidth
link:

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/?v=lui

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Karen Lewellen

Actually, links and elinks are showing up in Arabic as well.
makes me wonder if it is an ip address target of some kind.


On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


Since it happened to two of you, you share the equivalent of
/etc/lynx.cfg and that configuration file got modified probably without
the knowledge or consent of Ken Scott.

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 18:11:47
From: Karen Lewellen 
To: Chime Hart 
Cc: Tim Chase ,
Steffen Nurpmeso ,
Alejandro Lieber , lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

Chime,
If you  tried that link today, you are getting all that  stuff because for
some reason google here at shellworld  has been  presented in a language other
than English..at least for the past 24 hours.
Perhaps share that with Ken  Scott?
As for Google's failing to make improvements, that is something you should
personally and loudly raise  in  their accessibility list discussions if you
are a member.
Karen



On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Chime Hart wrote:


Well Tim, also here on Shellworld, when I look at that google page you
listed, I hear 12 links with no labels, but also `lots of "question marks"
Sure hitting an l for a lynx list or hitting tab for the next field can be
helpful. Not to get too far off-topic, but times when I referred an issue to
Google, such as lack of speech in Youtube on a ROKU. They varified my
concern, but in many months have made no improvements.
Chime





___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Bela Lubkin
Tim Chase wrote:

> At least according to Google's support page
>
> https://support.google.com/mail/answer/15049?hl=en
>
> you should be able to go to this link
>
> https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/1pq68r75kzvdr/?v%3Dlui
>
> to force the HTML/low-bandwidth mode (hopefully a little easier than
> trying to intercept the refresh).

The *other* link in that post has '?nocheckbrowser' at the end; I wonder
if that would help get past the insistence on JS with the low-bandwidth
link:

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/?v=lui

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Jude DaShiell
Since it happened to two of you, you share the equivalent of
/etc/lynx.cfg and that configuration file got modified probably without
the knowledge or consent of Ken Scott.

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 18:11:47
> From: Karen Lewellen 
> To: Chime Hart 
> Cc: Tim Chase ,
> Steffen Nurpmeso ,
> Alejandro Lieber , lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
>
> Chime,
> If you  tried that link today, you are getting all that  stuff because for
> some reason google here at shellworld  has been  presented in a language other
> than English..at least for the past 24 hours.
> Perhaps share that with Ken  Scott?
> As for Google's failing to make improvements, that is something you should
> personally and loudly raise  in  their accessibility list discussions if you
> are a member.
> Karen
>
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Chime Hart wrote:
>
> > Well Tim, also here on Shellworld, when I look at that google page you
> > listed, I hear 12 links with no labels, but also `lots of "question marks"
> > Sure hitting an l for a lynx list or hitting tab for the next field can be
> > helpful. Not to get too far off-topic, but times when I referred an issue to
> > Google, such as lack of speech in Youtube on a ROKU. They varified my
> > concern, but in many months have made no improvements.
> > Chime
> >
> >
> >
>
> ___
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>

-- 


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Karen Lewellen

Chime,
If you  tried that link today, you are getting all that  stuff because for 
some reason google here at shellworld  has been  presented in a language 
other than English..at least for the past 24 hours.

Perhaps share that with Ken  Scott?
As for Google's failing to make improvements, that is something you should 
personally and loudly raise  in  their accessibility list discussions if 
you are a member.

Karen



On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Chime Hart wrote:

Well Tim, also here on Shellworld, when I look at that google page you 
listed, I hear 12 links with no labels, but also `lots of "question marks" 
Sure hitting an l for a lynx list or hitting tab for the next field can be 
helpful. Not to get too far off-topic, but times when I referred an issue to 
Google, such as lack of speech in Youtube on a ROKU. They varified my 
concern, but in many months have made no improvements.

Chime





___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Chime Hart
Well Tim, also here on Shellworld, when I look at that google page you listed, I 
hear 12 links with no labels, but also `lots of "question marks" Sure hitting an 
l for a lynx list or hitting tab for the next field can be helpful. Not to get 
too far off-topic, but times when I referred an issue to Google, such as lack of 
speech in Youtube on a ROKU. They varified my concern, but in many months have 
made no improvements.

Chime


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Karen Lewellen wrote in :
 |steffen,
 |That page would perhaps appear differently for you, simply because you are 
 |in the  eu.
 |Presently  at shellworld, some of  the browsers show a hacked looking 
 |edition of  Google's homepages as well.

That could very well be the case.
Ciao, Karen.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Karen Lewellen

steffen,
That page would perhaps appear differently for you, simply because you are 
in the  eu.
Presently  at shellworld, some of  the browsers show a hacked looking 
edition of  Google's homepages as well.




On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:


Tim Chase wrote in <20191108124718.1db7a...@bigbox.attlocal.net>:
|On 2019-11-08 19:08, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Karen Lewellen wrote in
|> :
|>|Alejandro,
|>|I would appreciate a step by step, including where on the page
|> the option |for   first choosing then saving basic html as  an
|> option is located. |My test drive did not work last night, but I
...
|> As far as i see the option is gone.
|> The only chance you have is to be very quick at the login screen,
|> right after you have entered the password, while it loads, there
|> is the necessary link at the bottom of the page.  (I.e., first
|> screen to enter the name, second screen to enter the password,
|> then the third can shortly be seen -- maybe tell your helper to
|> very quickly hit the stop-load button, and i hope your browser
|> does that, then, instead of continuing the asynchronous load.)
|>
|> Funnily the basic HTML always offers the possibility to switch to
|> the other one.  Also funnily, only the rich version allows marking
|> all messages on the screen, so as to move them to trash.  (I just
|> cleared my GMail history.)
...

|At least according to Google's support page
|
|https://support.google.com/mail/answer/15049?hl=en
|
|you should be able to go to this link
|
|https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/1pq68r75kzvdr/?v%3Dlui
|
|to force the HTML/low-bandwidth mode (hopefully a little easier than
|trying to intercept the refresh).  I'm not sure if you have to use
|the JS-only login path or if there's a non-JavaScript HTML-only login
|option though.

If i follow that link in logged-out state i come to a wonderful
page that looks as if Apple had designed it.  (Note i use two
different accounts for web browsing, one throw-away thing with
a user who has no rights at all, unfortunately i still not made it
to put this account into a lxc container, or even a VM, even
though accelerated graphics now work even inside those it seems!
And another one which knows user credentials, for example for the
GMail account(s).  Since i log into the latter via ssh, and have
to unlock an encrypted volume in order to get firefox --
unfortunately i do need Javascript for these, ISP, VM hoster,
GMail, whatever, sigh -- up with access to its data, i have to
cross some hurdles of pain.  I tried the link with the
unpriviledged user.)

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Tim Chase wrote in <20191108124718.1db7a...@bigbox.attlocal.net>:
 |On 2019-11-08 19:08, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
 |> Karen Lewellen wrote in
 |> :  
 |>|Alejandro,
 |>|I would appreciate a step by step, including where on the page
 |> the option |for   first choosing then saving basic html as  an
 |> option is located. |My test drive did not work last night, but I
 ...
 |> As far as i see the option is gone.
 |> The only chance you have is to be very quick at the login screen,
 |> right after you have entered the password, while it loads, there
 |> is the necessary link at the bottom of the page.  (I.e., first
 |> screen to enter the name, second screen to enter the password,
 |> then the third can shortly be seen -- maybe tell your helper to
 |> very quickly hit the stop-load button, and i hope your browser
 |> does that, then, instead of continuing the asynchronous load.)
 |> 
 |> Funnily the basic HTML always offers the possibility to switch to
 |> the other one.  Also funnily, only the rich version allows marking
 |> all messages on the screen, so as to move them to trash.  (I just
 |> cleared my GMail history.)
 ...

 |At least according to Google's support page
 |
 |https://support.google.com/mail/answer/15049?hl=en
 |
 |you should be able to go to this link
 |
 |https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/1pq68r75kzvdr/?v%3Dlui
 |
 |to force the HTML/low-bandwidth mode (hopefully a little easier than
 |trying to intercept the refresh).  I'm not sure if you have to use
 |the JS-only login path or if there's a non-JavaScript HTML-only login
 |option though.

If i follow that link in logged-out state i come to a wonderful
page that looks as if Apple had designed it.  (Note i use two
different accounts for web browsing, one throw-away thing with
a user who has no rights at all, unfortunately i still not made it
to put this account into a lxc container, or even a VM, even
though accelerated graphics now work even inside those it seems!
And another one which knows user credentials, for example for the
GMail account(s).  Since i log into the latter via ssh, and have
to unlock an encrypted volume in order to get firefox --
unfortunately i do need Javascript for these, ISP, VM hoster,
GMail, whatever, sigh -- up with access to its data, i have to
cross some hurdles of pain.  I tried the link with the
unpriviledged user.)

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Karen Lewellen
Reading of that help page indicates you  must be in  an accepted 
browser, or in standard mail first 
which   will be fine as I can share that link directly with the production 
staff working with me.
It does not work for me otherwise, still produces the rejected error due 
to the lack of JavaScript.

Thanks though, its another door!
Kare



On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Tim Chase wrote:


At least according to Google's support page

https://support.google.com/mail/answer/15049?hl=en

you should be able to go to this link

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/1pq68r75kzvdr/?v%3Dlui

to force the HTML/low-bandwidth mode (hopefully a little easier than
trying to intercept the refresh).  I'm not sure if you have to use
the JS-only login path or if there's a non-JavaScript HTML-only login
option though.

-tim

On 2019-11-08 19:08, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:

Karen Lewellen wrote in
:
 |Alejandro,
 |I would appreciate a step by step, including where on the page
the option |for   first choosing then saving basic html as  an
option is located. |My test drive did not work last night, but I
suspect the problem may be |tied  to the person helping me already
having a gmail account that  there |system remembered.
 |They, using chrome, managed to log in as me,  with my guiding
them to a |basic html display of my inbox.  I am  unsure exactly
how they managed it, |logging out, assuming they did so from the
correct place, has made no |difference  to my reaching my own
account at all, let alone in Lynx. |can you provide a fine tuned
set of instructions? |I am going to try again, from a library here
in Canada, instead of getting |help  from an associate stateside.
 |Still, as I have no idea what they are seeing, the more precise
the |directions,  the more likely we will be successful.

As far as i see the option is gone.
The only chance you have is to be very quick at the login screen,
right after you have entered the password, while it loads, there
is the necessary link at the bottom of the page.  (I.e., first
screen to enter the name, second screen to enter the password,
then the third can shortly be seen -- maybe tell your helper to
very quickly hit the stop-load button, and i hope your browser
does that, then, instead of continuing the asynchronous load.)

Funnily the basic HTML always offers the possibility to switch to
the other one.  Also funnily, only the rich version allows marking
all messages on the screen, so as to move them to trash.  (I just
cleared my GMail history.)

Hope this helps.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev






___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Karen Lewellen wrote in :
 |Alejandro,
 |I would appreciate a step by step, including where on the page the option 
 |for   first choosing then saving basic html as  an option is located.
 |My test drive did not work last night, but I suspect the problem may be 
 |tied  to the person helping me already having a gmail account that  there 
 |system remembered.
 |They, using chrome, managed to log in as me,  with my guiding them to a 
 |basic html display of my inbox.  I am  unsure exactly how they managed it, 
 |logging out, assuming they did so from the correct place, has made no 
 |difference  to my reaching my own account at all, let alone in Lynx.
 |can you provide a fine tuned set of instructions?
 |I am going to try again, from a library here in Canada, instead of getting 
 |help  from an associate stateside.
 |Still, as I have no idea what they are seeing, the more precise the 
 |directions,  the more likely we will be successful.

As far as i see the option is gone.
The only chance you have is to be very quick at the login screen,
right after you have entered the password, while it loads, there
is the necessary link at the bottom of the page.  (I.e., first
screen to enter the name, second screen to enter the password,
then the third can shortly be seen -- maybe tell your helper to
very quickly hit the stop-load button, and i hope your browser
does that, then, instead of continuing the asynchronous load.)

Funnily the basic HTML always offers the possibility to switch to
the other one.  Also funnily, only the rich version allows marking
all messages on the screen, so as to move them to trash.  (I just
cleared my GMail history.)

Hope this helps.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-08 Thread Karen Lewellen

Alejandro,
I would appreciate a step by step, including where on the page the option 
for   first choosing then saving basic html as  an option is located.
My test drive did not work last night, but I suspect the problem may be 
tied  to the person helping me already having a gmail account that  there 
system remembered.
They, using chrome, managed to log in as me,  with my guiding them to a 
basic html display of my inbox.  I am  unsure exactly how they managed it, 
logging out, assuming they did so from the correct place, has made no 
difference  to my reaching my own account at all, let alone in Lynx.

can you provide a fine tuned set of instructions?
I am going to try again, from a library here in Canada, instead of getting 
help  from an associate stateside.
Still, as I have no idea what they are seeing, the more precise the 
directions,  the more likely we will be successful.


Thanks,
Karen


On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Alejandro Lieber wrote:


Karen:
My experience is that:

1)- If you log out of a session of gmail using the GMAIL STANDARD net view 
version using Firefox or Chrome, you will NOT BE able to open it again with a 
text browser without Java-scripts.


2)- if you log out  a session of gmail using the "GMAIL HTML FOR SLOW 
CONNECTIONS" version option at the botton of the page, using Firefox or 
Chrome, you will BE able to open it again ad infinitum with a text browser 
WITHOUT Java-scripts. You will be asked TWICE for the password.


3)- If you don't have a graphic browser, you'll have to give your email 
password  to
someone you trust to configure GMAIL in graphic mode, the only way it can be 
done.


Alejandro Lieber
Rosario  Argentina

On 6/11/19 22:11, Karen Lewellen wrote:

as expressed more than once, I can still reach my  first and older
 gmail account with lynx in basic html, do this several times a day.
 To be sure, perhaps only  newer accounts are generating the problem.
 Fully realizing that alpine  quality strongly flows from talent, we have
 it via dreamhost for  my office e-mail.  It times out while reading
 items several times a day and crashes regularly...likely tied to the
 dreamhost shell configuration more than anything else.



 On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:

> 
>  Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down gmail 
>  with an imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the alpine setup 
>  section.
> 
>  I'm reading this message via that approach.
> 
>  I have had an email account for some years and it still allows lynx 
>  access.  I think at some fairly recent point existing accounts were

>  grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.
> 
>  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> 
> >  shellworld?

> >  I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
> >  How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links 
> >  for

> >  example?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > 
> > >  Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt 
> > >  can be
> > >  used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's 
> > >  lots

> > >  of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.
> > > 
> > >  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > > 
> > > >  Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47

> > > >  From: Karen Lewellen 
> > > >  To: Mouse 
> > > >  Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > > >  Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
> > > > 
> > > >  The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I 
> > > >  could use elinks
> > > >  and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my 
> > > >  research   gmail

> > > >  account.
> > > >  They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the 
> > > >  right kind

> > > >  of JavaScript.
> > > >  Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  
> > > >  Presently
> > > >  although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  
> > > >  using a dos

> > > >  ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
> > > >  so  please share more details all the way around.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > >  gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,
> > > > > 
> > > > >  My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you 
> > > > >  are using

> > > > >  one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
> > > > >  horrors. 

Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-07 Thread Karen Lewellen
To be sure, that would  explain  how the problem happened in the first 
place.
because this is  a research account,  I have it opened at libraries by 
people assisting in that research all the time.  However, they would 
simply log out of their standard gmail sessions.
Google started thinking those devices were mine, in fact I stopped getting 
security warnings  the last couple of times.
so, once this issue is fixed I will have to develop a different  plan for 
managing research, but one fire dance at a time.

there are no words for how appreciative I am for a possible solution!
Kare



On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Alejandro Lieber wrote:


That's correct.

I think it's not important if the account is new or old. It depends how you 
logged out the last time with a graphical browser.


Alejandro Lieber

Rosario Argentina

On 7/11/19 14:10, Karen Lewellen wrote:

 Okay, this I can test.
 One question to be absolutely sure.
 The person doing this for me must first log into my gmail  account in a
 graphical  browser.  Then, they must choose to read  in basic html and
 log out  in the basic html  session.  yes the password is requested
 twice, I go through that doing so  in elinks and links.
 Once they log out  perhaps even saving basic html as my preference?, I
 should  get back in again.
  will try this evening posting my results.
 In fact, this explains how the problem likely started in  the first
 place.
 thanks!


 On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Alejandro Lieber wrote:

>  Karen:
>  My experience is that:
> 
>  1)- If you log out of a session of gmail using the GMAIL STANDARD net 
>  view version using Firefox or Chrome, you will NOT BE able to open it 
>  again with a text browser without Java-scripts.
> 
>  2)- if you log out  a session of gmail using the "GMAIL HTML FOR SLOW 
>  CONNECTIONS" version option at the botton of the page, using Firefox or 
>  Chrome, you will BE able to open it again ad infinitum with a text 
>  browser WITHOUT Java-scripts. You will be asked TWICE for the password.
> 
>  3)- If you don't have a graphic browser, you'll have to give your email 
>  password  to
>  someone you trust to configure GMAIL in graphic mode, the only way it 
>  can be done.
> 
>  Alejandro Lieber

>  Rosario  Argentina
> 
>  On 6/11/19 22:11, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> >  as expressed more than once, I can still reach my  first and older
> >   gmail account with lynx in basic html, do this several times a day.
> >   To be sure, perhaps only  newer accounts are generating the 
> >  problem.
> >   Fully realizing that alpine  quality strongly flows from talent, we 
> >  have
> >   it via dreamhost for  my office e-mail.  It times out while 
> >  reading

> >   items several times a day and crashes regularly...likely tied to the
> >   dreamhost shell configuration more than anything else.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:
> > 
> > > >   Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down 
> >  gmail >  with an imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the 
> >  alpine setup >  section.

> > > >   I'm reading this message via that approach.
> > > >   I have had an email account for some years and it still allows 
> >  lynx >  access.  I think at some fairly recent point existing 
> >  accounts were

> > >   grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.
> > > >   On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > > > >   shellworld?
> > > >   I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
> > > >   How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail 
> > links > >   for

> > > >   example?
> > > > > > > > > >   On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > > > > > >   Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask 
> >  is mutt > > >  can be
> > > > >   used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and 
> >  there's > > >  lots

> > > > >   of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.
> > > > > > > >   On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > > > > > > > >   Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
> > > > > >   From: Karen Lewellen 
> > > > > >   To: Mouse 
> > > > > >   Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > > > > >   Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
> > > > > > > > > >   The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior 
> >  to  now I > > > > could use elinks
> > > > > >   and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach 
> 

Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-07 Thread Alejandro Lieber

That's correct.

I think it's not important if the account is new or old. It depends how 
you logged out the last time with a graphical browser.


Alejandro Lieber

Rosario Argentina

On 7/11/19 14:10, Karen Lewellen wrote:

Okay, this I can test.
One question to be absolutely sure.
The person doing this for me must first log into my gmail  account in 
a graphical  browser.  Then, they must choose to read  in basic html 
and log out  in the basic html  session.  yes the password is 
requested twice, I go through that doing so  in elinks and links.
Once they log out  perhaps even saving basic html as my preference?, I 
should  get back in again.

 will try this evening posting my results.
In fact, this explains how the problem likely started in  the first 
place.

thanks!


On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Alejandro Lieber wrote:


Karen:
My experience is that:

1)- If you log out of a session of gmail using the GMAIL STANDARD net 
view version using Firefox or Chrome, you will NOT BE able to open it 
again with a text browser without Java-scripts.


2)- if you log out  a session of gmail using the "GMAIL HTML FOR SLOW 
CONNECTIONS" version option at the botton of the page, using Firefox 
or Chrome, you will BE able to open it again ad infinitum with a text 
browser WITHOUT Java-scripts. You will be asked TWICE for the password.


3)- If you don't have a graphic browser, you'll have to give your 
email password  to
someone you trust to configure GMAIL in graphic mode, the only way it 
can be done.


Alejandro Lieber
Rosario  Argentina

On 6/11/19 22:11, Karen Lewellen wrote:

as expressed more than once, I can still reach my  first and older
 gmail account with lynx in basic html, do this several times a day.
 To be sure, perhaps only  newer accounts are generating the problem.
 Fully realizing that alpine  quality strongly flows from talent, we 
have

 it via dreamhost for  my office e-mail.  It times out while reading
 items several times a day and crashes regularly...likely tied to the
 dreamhost shell configuration more than anything else.



 On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:

> >  Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down 
gmail >  with an imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the 
alpine setup >  section.

> >  I'm reading this message via that approach.
> >  I have had an email account for some years and it still allows 
lynx >  access.  I think at some fairly recent point existing 
accounts were

>  grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.
> >  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > >  shellworld?
> >  I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
> >  How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail 
links > >  for

> >  example?
> > > > > > > >  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > > > >  Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask 
is mutt > > >  can be
> > >  used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and 
there's > > >  lots

> > >  of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.
> > > > > >  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > > > > > >  Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
> > > >  From: Karen Lewellen 
> > > >  To: Mouse 
> > > >  Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > > >  Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
> > > > > > > >  The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior 
to  now I > > > > could use elinks
> > > >  and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach 
my > > > >  research   gmail

> > > >  account.
> > > >  They no longer allow it though because google claims it is 
not the > > > >  right kind

> > > >  of JavaScript.
> > > >  Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is 
done.  > > > >  Presently
> > > >  although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes 
from  > > > >  using a dos
> > > >  ssh  telnet client to a shell service. Nothing from my 
desktop.

> > > >  so  please share more details all the way around.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >  gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,
> > > > > > > > > >  My experience is that gmail supports POP and 
IMAP only if you > > > > >  are using
> > > > >  one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge 
crawling GUI
> > > > >  horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when 
I was > > > > >  fussing
> > > > >  with mail for work, gma

Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-07 Thread Karen Lewellen

Okay, this I can test.
One question to be absolutely sure.
The person doing this for me must first log into my gmail  account in a 
graphical  browser.  Then, they must choose to read  in basic html and log 
out  in the basic html  session.  yes the password  is requested twice, I 
go through that doing so  in elinks and links.
Once they log out  perhaps even saving basic html as my preference?, I 
should  get back in again.

 will try this evening posting my results.
In fact, this explains how the problem likely started in  the first place.
thanks!


On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Alejandro Lieber wrote:


Karen:
My experience is that:

1)- If you log out of a session of gmail using the GMAIL STANDARD net view 
version using Firefox or Chrome, you will NOT BE able to open it again with a 
text browser without Java-scripts.


2)- if you log out  a session of gmail using the "GMAIL HTML FOR SLOW 
CONNECTIONS" version option at the botton of the page, using Firefox or 
Chrome, you will BE able to open it again ad infinitum with a text browser 
WITHOUT Java-scripts. You will be asked TWICE for the password.


3)- If you don't have a graphic browser, you'll have to give your email 
password  to
someone you trust to configure GMAIL in graphic mode, the only way it can be 
done.


Alejandro Lieber
Rosario  Argentina

On 6/11/19 22:11, Karen Lewellen wrote:

as expressed more than once, I can still reach my  first and older
 gmail account with lynx in basic html, do this several times a day.
 To be sure, perhaps only  newer accounts are generating the problem.
 Fully realizing that alpine  quality strongly flows from talent, we have
 it via dreamhost for  my office e-mail.  It times out while reading
 items several times a day and crashes regularly...likely tied to the
 dreamhost shell configuration more than anything else.



 On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:

> 
>  Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down gmail 
>  with an imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the alpine setup 
>  section.
> 
>  I'm reading this message via that approach.
> 
>  I have had an email account for some years and it still allows lynx 
>  access.  I think at some fairly recent point existing accounts were

>  grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.
> 
>  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> 
> >  shellworld?

> >  I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
> >  How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links 
> >  for

> >  example?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > 
> > >  Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt 
> > >  can be
> > >  used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's 
> > >  lots

> > >  of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.
> > > 
> > >  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > > 
> > > >  Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47

> > > >  From: Karen Lewellen 
> > > >  To: Mouse 
> > > >  Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > > >  Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
> > > > 
> > > >  The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I 
> > > >  could use elinks
> > > >  and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my 
> > > >  research   gmail

> > > >  account.
> > > >  They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the 
> > > >  right kind

> > > >  of JavaScript.
> > > >  Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  
> > > >  Presently
> > > >  although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  
> > > >  using a dos

> > > >  ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
> > > >  so  please share more details all the way around.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > >  gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,
> > > > > 
> > > > >  My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you 
> > > > >  are using

> > > > >  one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
> > > > >  horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was 
> > > > >  fussing
> > > > >  with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird 
> > > > >  that was
> > > > >  installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was 
> > > > >  insufficient
> > 

Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-07 Thread Alejandro Lieber

Karen:

My experience is that:

1)- If you log out of a session of gmail using the GMAIL STANDARD net 
view version using Firefox or Chrome, you will NOT BE able to open it 
again with a text browser without Java-scripts.


2)- if you log out  a session of gmail using the "GMAIL HTML FOR SLOW 
CONNECTIONS" version option at the botton of the page, using Firefox or 
Chrome, you will BE able to open it again ad infinitum with a text 
browser WITHOUT Java-scripts. You will be asked TWICE for the password.


3)- If you don't have a graphic browser, you'll have to give your email 
password  to
someone you trust to configure GMAIL in graphic mode, the only way it 
can be done.


Alejandro Lieber
Rosario  Argentina

On 6/11/19 22:11, Karen Lewellen wrote:
as expressed more than once, I can still reach my  first and older 
gmail account with lynx in basic html, do this several times a day.

To be sure, perhaps only  newer accounts are generating the problem.
Fully realizing that alpine  quality strongly flows from talent, we 
have it via dreamhost for  my office e-mail.  It times out while 
reading items several times a day and crashes regularly...likely tied 
to the dreamhost shell configuration more than anything else.




On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:



Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down gmail 
with an imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the alpine setup 
section.


I'm reading this message via that approach.

I have had an email account for some years and it still allows lynx 
access.  I think at some fairly recent point existing accounts were

grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


shellworld?
I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for
example?



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:

Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt 
can be

used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
From: Karen Lewellen 
To: Mouse 
Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could 
use elinks
and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my 
research   gmail

account.
They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the 
right kind

of JavaScript.
Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  
Presently
although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  
using a dos

ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
so  please share more details all the way around.



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:


gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,


My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are 
using

one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was 
fussing
with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that 
was
installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was 
insufficient
in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect. So I was 
forced
onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic 
HTML view
and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being 
grandfathered;

I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.

I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.

and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, 
that
run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment 
present.


If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail 
isn't

interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
the stringency of their stance.)

/~\ The ASCII  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X  Against HTML    mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--
XB




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-07 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Karen Lewellen wrote in :
 |On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
 |> David Woolley wrote in  ey.me.uk>:
 |>|On 05/11/2019 22:14, Karen Lewellen wrote:
 |>|> 1. I do not, cannot physically use the windows operating system.
 |>|
 |>|Even if you are blind, the in industry expectation is that you use a
 |>|program called JAWS, under Windows.  In fact, many companies seem to
 |>|think that all that is necessary for their web site to be accessible is
 |>|that it can be used under JAWS.
 |>|
 |>|If you still want a non-graphical environment, Linux would be the
 |>|operating system of choice.
 |>|
 |>|Whilst there are standards for remoting accessing mail, there are no
 |>|effective ones for remotely accessing address books, etc., so if you use
 |>|a network based service for this you have to accept that they will be
 |>|targeting Windows users only, and any accessibility considerations will
 |>|assume the use of JAWS + Windows.
 |>
 |> They plan to overcome that with the JMAP protocol, the mail part
 |> of which became RFC 8621.
 |>
 |>|By insisting on MS-DOS, you are putting yourself in a position where it
 |>|is becoming increasingly difficult to support your usage.

 |May I ask on what you base my *insistence* on ms dos?

I did not say anything over DOS.  Personally i was using 4DOS for
some years, until about ~20 years ago.  For years, at least five
or six, i always want to install and try out FreeDOS, but did not
make it even when they had their jubilee.  Maybe someday i make
it.

 |Unfortunately, due to an auditory processing disorder tied to a surgical 
 |vascular accident,  some frequencies, most software generated voices 
 |stimulate the dizzy centres of my brain.
 |That means for me the safe ranges come from hardware sources, dectalk 
 |specifically.
 |Given the quality of that speech, one would think those creating windows 
 |based programs would have  kept the patents and code for those voices.
 |Instead, one company  bought another wasted resources and created 
 |disturbingly poor quality  speech instead.

You could see me standing lost.

 |To be sure I prefer a low graphics environment.
 |Still as the saying goes DOS ain't dead, check out the djdpp project, or 
 |even freedos.

Yes, FreeDOS i would have interest in.  And Haiku, too.

 |What is largely dead?  the assumption that  humans even if they share a 
 |label , are still individuals, with unique bodies circumstances and 
 |preferences.

Yes, the individuals.  But be aware of the masses.

 |The assumption, often perpetuated by  consumer groups and software makers 
 |is that all people sharing a label are Interchangeable.
 |Did Linux write drivers t incorporate dectalk in products like the reading 
 |edge? no.
 |Can dos be a graphical platform, certainly.
 |Was access to basic html in gmail important to many, not even tied to 
 |accessibility?
 |Absolutely, do a search for the phrase  how do I  access gmail in basic 
 |html?  and you will find lots and lots of lists where people discuss the 
 |benefits for various reasons.
 |before you decide I am insisting on anything perhaps ask why the platform 
 |is needful.  Perhaps if more developers did not take a one user fits all 
 |approach, I would have safer voices to use.

Hm, hm.  Well, well.  I prefer the basic HTML too, on the other
hand i am lucky not to have a need to go to the web interface,
practically ever.  Sometimes they force a login, sometimes mails
are too large to become forwarded to the address stuff gets
redirected to.  (I do not really regulary use GMail as such no
more, via POP3 / IMAP / SMTP that is, only for testing, for which
i am thankful, i do have some GMail-only accounts, but these have
practically no traffic, and they are also forwarded, only SMTPS it
is for them, in practice.)
I never used anything beyond plain email at GMail, not a crime,
but a rhyme.  He.  Sorry.

 --End of 

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-07 Thread Karen Lewellen

Oh I am not surprised at all.


On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


It sure did, and that seriously surprised me too.

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 20:42:54
From: Karen Lewellen 
To: Jude DaShiell 
Cc: dan d. , Mouse ,
lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

Wait, your account got hacked after using Google's more secure authentication
process?



On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


I had to create a new account on google since my original account got
taken over after I enabled two-factor authentication.  I can access my
account using mutt and it turns out edbrowse will also work.
The edbrowse app requires a directory structure be created described in
the .ebrc file dropped into a user directory the first time edbrowse is
run.  The .ebrc file has to have things changed in it for user's real
gmail accounts too.  So anyone uncomfortable doing these tasks had best
not run edbrowse.  Anyone wishing to use edbrowse will have to locate
the user manual for it where they use it and will need to read and do
the learning curve.  This is a powerful and unique tool, so use
accordingly or handle the consequences.

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:


Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:26:05
From: dan d. 
To: Karen Lewellen 
Cc: Jude DaShiell , Mouse ,
lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?


Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down gmail with
an imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the alpine setup section.

I'm reading this message via that approach.

I have had an email account for some years and it still allows lynx access.
I think at some fairly recent point existing accounts were
grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


shellworld?
I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for
example?



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt can be
used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
From: Karen Lewellen 
To: Mouse 
Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use
elinks
and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my research
gmail
account.
They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right
kind
of JavaScript.
Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.
Presently
although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a
dos
ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
so  please share more details all the way around.



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:


gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,


My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.

I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.


and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.


If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
the stringency of their stance.)

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev






--






--




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread Jude DaShiell
It sure did, and that seriously surprised me too.

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 20:42:54
> From: Karen Lewellen 
> To: Jude DaShiell 
> Cc: dan d. , Mouse ,
> lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
>
> Wait, your account got hacked after using Google's more secure authentication
> process?
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> > I had to create a new account on google since my original account got
> > taken over after I enabled two-factor authentication.  I can access my
> > account using mutt and it turns out edbrowse will also work.
> > The edbrowse app requires a directory structure be created described in
> > the .ebrc file dropped into a user directory the first time edbrowse is
> > run.  The .ebrc file has to have things changed in it for user's real
> > gmail accounts too.  So anyone uncomfortable doing these tasks had best
> > not run edbrowse.  Anyone wishing to use edbrowse will have to locate
> > the user manual for it where they use it and will need to read and do
> > the learning curve.  This is a powerful and unique tool, so use
> > accordingly or handle the consequences.
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:26:05
> >> From: dan d. 
> >> To: Karen Lewellen 
> >> Cc: Jude DaShiell , Mouse ,
> >> lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
> >>
> >>
> >> Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down gmail with
> >> an imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the alpine setup section.
> >>
> >> I'm reading this message via that approach.
> >>
> >> I have had an email account for some years and it still allows lynx access.
> >> I think at some fairly recent point existing accounts were
> >> grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.
> >>
> >> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >>
> >>> shellworld?
> >>> I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
> >>> How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for
> >>> example?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt can be
> >>>> used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
> >>>> of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
> >>>>> From: Karen Lewellen 
> >>>>> To: Mouse 
> >>>>> Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use
> >>>>> elinks
> >>>>> and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my research
> >>>>> gmail
> >>>>> account.
> >>>>> They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right
> >>>>> kind
> >>>>> of JavaScript.
> >>>>> Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.
> >>>>> Presently
> >>>>> although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a
> >>>>> dos
> >>>>> ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
> >>>>> so  please share more details all the way around.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
> >>>>>> one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
> >>>>>> horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
> >>>>>> with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
> >>>>>> installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
> >>>>>> in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
>

Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread Karen Lewellen
Wait, your account got hacked after using Google's more secure 
authentication process?




On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


I had to create a new account on google since my original account got
taken over after I enabled two-factor authentication.  I can access my
account using mutt and it turns out edbrowse will also work.
The edbrowse app requires a directory structure be created described in
the .ebrc file dropped into a user directory the first time edbrowse is
run.  The .ebrc file has to have things changed in it for user's real
gmail accounts too.  So anyone uncomfortable doing these tasks had best
not run edbrowse.  Anyone wishing to use edbrowse will have to locate
the user manual for it where they use it and will need to read and do
the learning curve.  This is a powerful and unique tool, so use
accordingly or handle the consequences.

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:


Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:26:05
From: dan d. 
To: Karen Lewellen 
Cc: Jude DaShiell , Mouse ,
lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?


Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down gmail with an 
imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the alpine setup section.

I'm reading this message via that approach.

I have had an email account for some years and it still allows lynx access.  I 
think at some fairly recent point existing accounts were
grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


shellworld?
I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for
example?



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt can be
used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
From: Karen Lewellen 
To: Mouse 
Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use elinks
and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my research   gmail
account.
They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right kind
of JavaScript.
Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  Presently
although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a dos
ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
so  please share more details all the way around.



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:


gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,


My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.

I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.


and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.


If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
the stringency of their stance.)

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev






--




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread Karen Lewellen

I am using  wifi in ms dos 7.1 right now.
The package I use sshdos, allows me to reach shellworld and other shell 
services without issue.   Granted I  have done the research, but even 
freedos has native support for wifi, so I am unsure why you feel this 
cannot be done.  The DOS djpgg system is even more  detailed.
Technically I can reach the internet without first accessing shell 
services, but lack a solid  edition of lynx for dos incorporating latest 
configurations to use.



On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


msdos and drdos and freedos remain viable with packages like commo as
terminals to log into remote resources and run linux/unix commands on
those remote systems.  I know people who forgot how to configure
ethernet cards in msdos, but maybe using a terminal program like kermit
would access those ethernet cards.  I doubt dos has necessary support to
get wi-fi connections running.

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:


Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 11:51:55
From: Steffen Nurpmeso 
To: David Woolley 
Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

David Woolley wrote in :
 |On 05/11/2019 22:14, Karen Lewellen wrote:
 |> 1. I do not, cannot physically use the windows operating system.
 |
 |Even if you are blind, the in industry expectation is that you use a
 |program called JAWS, under Windows.  In fact, many companies seem to
 |think that all that is necessary for their web site to be accessible is
 |that it can be used under JAWS.
 |
 |If you still want a non-graphical environment, Linux would be the
 |operating system of choice.
 |
 |Whilst there are standards for remoting accessing mail, there are no
 |effective ones for remotely accessing address books, etc., so if you use
 |a network based service for this you have to accept that they will be
 |targeting Windows users only, and any accessibility considerations will
 |assume the use of JAWS + Windows.

They plan to overcome that with the JMAP protocol, the mail part
of which became RFC 8621.

 |By insisting on MS-DOS, you are putting yourself in a position where it
 |is becoming increasingly difficult to support your usage.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread Karen Lewellen
as expressed more than once, I can still reach my  first and older gmail 
account with lynx in basic html, do this several times a day.

To be sure, perhaps only  newer accounts are generating the problem.
Fully realizing that alpine  quality strongly flows from talent, we have 
it via dreamhost for  my office e-mail.  It times out while reading items 
several times a day and crashes regularly...likely tied to the dreamhost 
shell configuration more than anything else.




On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:



Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down gmail with an 
imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the alpine setup section.

I'm reading this message via that approach.

I have had an email account for some years and it still allows lynx access.  I 
think at some fairly recent point existing accounts were
grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


shellworld?
I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for
example?



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt can be
used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
From: Karen Lewellen 
To: Mouse 
Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use elinks
and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my research   gmail
account.
They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right kind
of JavaScript.
Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  Presently
although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a dos
ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
so  please share more details all the way around.



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:


gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,


My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.

I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.


and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.


If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
the stringency of their stance.)

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--
XB




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread Karen Lewellen

where is somewhere?
I may need to post the article here for folks to understand.
Google has started using a proprietary edition of JavaScript for tracking 
purposes that they are branding  as security.




On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:



I read somewher elinks and the like use a subset of java only with inherent 
limited java functionality.
That is likely what google is seeing when querying a client request.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Actually, this is not correct.
I have gotten this duplicated by google accessibility  staff.  In fact
Google  stated in an article recently that  since only crooks turn off
JavaScript, they will not allow anyone  to sign into their gmail account
without JavaScript.
When I requested answers for accessibility reasons, one staff member
duplicated the issue using elinks, and told me that it was because Google
did  not consider elinks  to use the "right" kind of JavaScript.
Later, a different staff member who normally uses links reported that they
too   could no longer reach basic html using the browser.
This is not a client issue, as I am going directly to  google for my gmail
reading.
Karen


On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:


The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to now I could use
elinks and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my
research gmail account.



They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the
right kind of JavaScript.  Generally speaking I too would love
learning how this is done.


This has to depend on something in your client.  Google cannot, after
all, observe anything about your client except its network behaviour;
something is provoking different network behaviour - or, possibly, your
client's blind trust in the JS Google is sending it is causing it to
refuse you locally without exhibiting _any_ network behaviour.

My guess would be that your JS implementation includes some kind of
"this is what sort of implementation I am" string, which Google is
asking it to send back - or, more stupidly but in my estimation a
little more likely, is checking somewhere in the JS code it sends to
you.  Learning details (without help from Google, which help I doubt
would be forthcoming) would probably require inspecting the JS it sends
and/or snooping the cleartext of the communication.  Neither one sounds
trivial to me, though.

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--
XB




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread Karen Lewellen

May I ask on what you base my *insistence* on ms dos?
Unfortunately, due to an auditory processing disorder tied to a surgical 
vascular accident,  some frequencies, most software generated voices 
stimulate the dizzy centres of my brain.
That means for me the safe ranges come from hardware sources, dectalk 
specifically.
Given the quality of that speech, one would think those creating windows 
based programs would have  kept the patents and code for those voices.
Instead, one company  bought another wasted resources and created 
disturbingly poor quality  speech instead.

To be sure I prefer a low graphics environment.
Still as the saying goes DOS ain't dead, check out the djdpp project, or 
even freedos.
What is largely dead?  the assumption that  humans even if they share a 
label , are still individuals, with unique bodies circumstances and 
preferences.
The assumption, often perpetuated by  consumer groups and software makers 
is that all people sharing a label are Interchangeable.
Did Linux write drivers t incorporate dectalk in products like the reading 
edge? no.

Can dos be a graphical platform, certainly.
Was access to basic html in gmail important to many, not even tied to 
accessibility?
Absolutely, do a search for the phrase  how do I  access gmail in basic 
html?  and you will find lots and lots of lists where people discuss the 
benefits for various reasons.
before you decide I am insisting on anything perhaps ask why the platform 
is needful.  Perhaps if more developers did not take a one user fits all 
approach, I would have safer voices to use.




On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:


David Woolley wrote in :
|On 05/11/2019 22:14, Karen Lewellen wrote:
|> 1. I do not, cannot physically use the windows operating system.
|
|Even if you are blind, the in industry expectation is that you use a
|program called JAWS, under Windows.  In fact, many companies seem to
|think that all that is necessary for their web site to be accessible is
|that it can be used under JAWS.
|
|If you still want a non-graphical environment, Linux would be the
|operating system of choice.
|
|Whilst there are standards for remoting accessing mail, there are no
|effective ones for remotely accessing address books, etc., so if you use
|a network based service for this you have to accept that they will be
|targeting Windows users only, and any accessibility considerations will
|assume the use of JAWS + Windows.

They plan to overcome that with the JMAP protocol, the mail part
of which became RFC 8621.

|By insisting on MS-DOS, you are putting yourself in a position where it
|is becoming increasingly difficult to support your usage.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread Jude DaShiell
msdos and drdos and freedos remain viable with packages like commo as
terminals to log into remote resources and run linux/unix commands on
those remote systems.  I know people who forgot how to configure
ethernet cards in msdos, but maybe using a terminal program like kermit
would access those ethernet cards.  I doubt dos has necessary support to
get wi-fi connections running.

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:

> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 11:51:55
> From: Steffen Nurpmeso 
> To: David Woolley 
> Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
>
> David Woolley wrote in  ey.me.uk>:
>  |On 05/11/2019 22:14, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>  |> 1. I do not, cannot physically use the windows operating system.
>  |
>  |Even if you are blind, the in industry expectation is that you use a
>  |program called JAWS, under Windows.  In fact, many companies seem to
>  |think that all that is necessary for their web site to be accessible is
>  |that it can be used under JAWS.
>  |
>  |If you still want a non-graphical environment, Linux would be the
>  |operating system of choice.
>  |
>  |Whilst there are standards for remoting accessing mail, there are no
>  |effective ones for remotely accessing address books, etc., so if you use
>  |a network based service for this you have to accept that they will be
>  |targeting Windows users only, and any accessibility considerations will
>  |assume the use of JAWS + Windows.
>
> They plan to overcome that with the JMAP protocol, the mail part
> of which became RFC 8621.
>
>  |By insisting on MS-DOS, you are putting yourself in a position where it
>  |is becoming increasingly difficult to support your usage.
>
> --steffen
> |
> |Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
> |der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
> |einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
> |(By Robert Gernhardt)
>
> ___
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>

-- 


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread Jude DaShiell
I had to create a new account on google since my original account got
taken over after I enabled two-factor authentication.  I can access my
account using mutt and it turns out edbrowse will also work.
The edbrowse app requires a directory structure be created described in
the .ebrc file dropped into a user directory the first time edbrowse is
run.  The .ebrc file has to have things changed in it for user's real
gmail accounts too.  So anyone uncomfortable doing these tasks had best
not run edbrowse.  Anyone wishing to use edbrowse will have to locate
the user manual for it where they use it and will need to read and do
the learning curve.  This is a powerful and unique tool, so use
accordingly or handle the consequences.

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, dan d. wrote:

> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:26:05
> From: dan d. 
> To: Karen Lewellen 
> Cc: Jude DaShiell , Mouse ,
> lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
>
>
> Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down gmail with an 
> imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the alpine setup section.
>
> I'm reading this message via that approach.
>
> I have had an email account for some years and it still allows lynx access.  
> I think at some fairly recent point existing accounts were
> grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>
> > shellworld?
> > I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
> > How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for
> > example?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >
> > > Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt can be
> > > used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
> > > of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > >
> > >> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
> > >> From: Karen Lewellen 
> > >> To: Mouse 
> > >> Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
> > >>
> > >> The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use 
> > >> elinks
> > >> and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my research   
> > >> gmail
> > >> account.
> > >> They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right 
> > >> kind
> > >> of JavaScript.
> > >> Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  Presently
> > >> although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a 
> > >> dos
> > >> ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
> > >> so  please share more details all the way around.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>> gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,
> > >>>
> > >>> My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
> > >>> one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
> > >>> horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
> > >>> with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
> > >>> installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
> > >>> in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
> > >>> onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
> > >>> and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
> > >>> I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.
> > >>>
> > >>> I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.
> > >>>
> > >>>> and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
> > >>>> run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.
> > >>>
> > >>> If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
> > >>> interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
> > >>> mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
> > >>> the stringency of their stance.)
> > >>>
> > >>> /~\ The ASCII Mouse
> > >>> \ / Ribbon Campaign
> > >>> X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
> > >>> / \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
> > >>>
> > >>> ___
> > >>> Lynx-dev mailing list
> > >>> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ___
> > >> Lynx-dev mailing list
> > >> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ___
> > Lynx-dev mailing list
> > Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> >
>
>

-- 


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread dan d.

Alpine is another text only cli mail client that can pull down gmail with an 
imap or pop connection.  It is configured in the alpine setup section.

I'm reading this message via that approach.

I have had an email account for some years and it still allows lynx access.  I 
think at some fairly recent point existing accounts were
grandfathered in and new accounts refused using lynx.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> shellworld?
> I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
> How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for
> example?
>
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> > Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt can be
> > used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
> > of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
> >> From: Karen Lewellen 
> >> To: Mouse 
> >> Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
> >>
> >> The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use 
> >> elinks
> >> and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my research   
> >> gmail
> >> account.
> >> They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right 
> >> kind
> >> of JavaScript.
> >> Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  Presently
> >> although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a dos
> >> ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
> >> so  please share more details all the way around.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:
> >>
> >>>> gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,
> >>>
> >>> My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
> >>> one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
> >>> horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
> >>> with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
> >>> installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
> >>> in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
> >>> onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
> >>> and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
> >>> I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.
> >>>
> >>> I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.
> >>>
> >>>> and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
> >>>> run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.
> >>>
> >>> If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
> >>> interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
> >>> mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
> >>> the stringency of their stance.)
> >>>
> >>> /~\ The ASCII   Mouse
> >>> \ / Ribbon Campaign
> >>> X  Against HTML   mo...@rodents-montreal.org
> >>> / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> Lynx-dev mailing list
> >>> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Lynx-dev mailing list
> >> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> >
>
> ___
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>

-- 
XB

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread dan d.

I read somewher elinks and the like use a subset of java only with inherent 
limited java functionality.
That is likely what google is seeing when querying a client request.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> Actually, this is not correct.
> I have gotten this duplicated by google accessibility  staff.  In fact
> Google  stated in an article recently that  since only crooks turn off
> JavaScript, they will not allow anyone  to sign into their gmail account
> without JavaScript.
> When I requested answers for accessibility reasons, one staff member
> duplicated the issue using elinks, and told me that it was because Google
> did  not consider elinks  to use the "right" kind of JavaScript.
> Later, a different staff member who normally uses links reported that they
> too   could no longer reach basic html using the browser.
> This is not a client issue, as I am going directly to  google for my gmail
> reading.
> Karen
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:
>
> >> The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to now I could use
> >> elinks and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my
> >> research gmail account.
> >
> >> They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the
> >> right kind of JavaScript.  Generally speaking I too would love
> >> learning how this is done.
> >
> > This has to depend on something in your client.  Google cannot, after
> > all, observe anything about your client except its network behaviour;
> > something is provoking different network behaviour - or, possibly, your
> > client's blind trust in the JS Google is sending it is causing it to
> > refuse you locally without exhibiting _any_ network behaviour.
> >
> > My guess would be that your JS implementation includes some kind of
> > "this is what sort of implementation I am" string, which Google is
> > asking it to send back - or, more stupidly but in my estimation a
> > little more likely, is checking somewhere in the JS code it sends to
> > you.  Learning details (without help from Google, which help I doubt
> > would be forthcoming) would probably require inspecting the JS it sends
> > and/or snooping the cleartext of the communication.  Neither one sounds
> > trivial to me, though.
> >
> > /~\ The ASCII Mouse
> > \ / Ribbon Campaign
> > X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
> > / \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
> >
> > ___
> > Lynx-dev mailing list
> > Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> >
>
> ___
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>

-- 
XB

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
David Woolley wrote in :
 |On 05/11/2019 22:14, Karen Lewellen wrote:
 |> 1. I do not, cannot physically use the windows operating system.
 |
 |Even if you are blind, the in industry expectation is that you use a 
 |program called JAWS, under Windows.  In fact, many companies seem to 
 |think that all that is necessary for their web site to be accessible is 
 |that it can be used under JAWS.
 |
 |If you still want a non-graphical environment, Linux would be the 
 |operating system of choice.
 |
 |Whilst there are standards for remoting accessing mail, there are no 
 |effective ones for remotely accessing address books, etc., so if you use 
 |a network based service for this you have to accept that they will be 
 |targeting Windows users only, and any accessibility considerations will 
 |assume the use of JAWS + Windows.

They plan to overcome that with the JMAP protocol, the mail part
of which became RFC 8621.

 |By insisting on MS-DOS, you are putting yourself in a position where it 
 |is becoming increasingly difficult to support your usage.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread Jude DaShiell
Most windows users actually use nvda due to the price tag on jaws
especially true outside the United States.
I don't know how to do this, but an alternate solution would be to
modify the google account so any email coming to it is forwarded to
another email address.  Apparently a way exists to do this and in that
way you cut out the web for email access.
edbrowse has a learning curve and the sample .ebrc needs editing to make
it particular to a given user account.
I've never heard of anyone building edbrowse in msdos no idea if that's
even feasible.
Also, many versions of jaws exist including Federal versions modified
for security and industry can't even manage all of those versions well.

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, David Woolley wrote:

> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:52:24
> From: David Woolley 
> To: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
>
> On 05/11/2019 22:14, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > 1. I do not, cannot physically use the windows operating system.
>
> Even if you are blind, the in industry expectation is that you use a program
> called JAWS, under Windows.  In fact, many companies seem to think that all
> that is necessary for their web site to be accessible is that it can be used
> under JAWS.
>
> If you still want a non-graphical environment, Linux would be the operating
> system of choice.
>
> Whilst there are standards for remoting accessing mail, there are no effective
> ones for remotely accessing address books, etc., so if you use a network based
> service for this you have to accept that they will be targeting Windows users
> only, and any accessibility considerations will assume the use of JAWS +
> Windows.
>
> By insisting on MS-DOS, you are putting yourself in a position where it is
> becoming increasingly difficult to support your usage.
>
> ___
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>
>

-- 


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-06 Thread David Woolley

On 05/11/2019 22:14, Karen Lewellen wrote:

1. I do not, cannot physically use the windows operating system.


Even if you are blind, the in industry expectation is that you use a 
program called JAWS, under Windows.  In fact, many companies seem to 
think that all that is necessary for their web site to be accessible is 
that it can be used under JAWS.


If you still want a non-graphical environment, Linux would be the 
operating system of choice.


Whilst there are standards for remoting accessing mail, there are no 
effective ones for remotely accessing address books, etc., so if you use 
a network based service for this you have to accept that they will be 
targeting Windows users only, and any accessibility considerations will 
assume the use of JAWS + Windows.


By insisting on MS-DOS, you are putting yourself in a position where it 
is becoming increasingly difficult to support your usage.


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Karen Lewellen

1. I do not, cannot physically use the windows operating system.
2.  I  am not sure I follow the copy paste question at all, my goal is to 
reach my gmail  account using lynx as I currently can with my main 
account.
Any back door, because of the extensive research and  mail history, 
contacts, stored documents and links existing in this inbox, much be as 
easily accessible as it would be normally from

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=html=h
 which currently produces,
Couldn't sign you in

   The browser you're using doesn't support JavaScript, or has JavaScript
   turned off.

   To keep your Google Account secure, try signing in on a browser that
   has JavaScript turned on. [1]Learn more
 * Google
 * [2]Privacy
 * [3]Terms

   Change language [?English (United States)_]

Karen

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:


Karen Lewellen wrote in :
|shellworld?
|I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
|How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for
|example?

But if all else fails copy+paste should be possible, no?  On
X Windows, dependent on the window manager, you could also
configure mouse actions etc. so then URL selection + X would do it
for you.  If you use a terminal multiplexer like tmux this could
also be doable, mostly what i do.  I do not know whether mutt has
some hook which allows direct start of a browser for a given thing
you see in the pager.

(Btw., a couple of years ago i watched a video of Russ Cox
describing how he works with the Acme editor in Plan9(Port), and
there it shows how efficient mouse copy+paste can be.  It is [1].
Near the end i think he worked a bit.  Btw. the Plan9 Rio terminal
/ rc shell did not even have a history, it is all done via
scrolling, and copy + paste.  Not my thing, but if you can...)

 [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP1xVpMPn8M

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Karen Lewellen wrote in :
 |shellworld?
 |I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
 |How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for 
 |example?

But if all else fails copy+paste should be possible, no?  On
X Windows, dependent on the window manager, you could also
configure mouse actions etc. so then URL selection + X would do it
for you.  If you use a terminal multiplexer like tmux this could
also be doable, mostly what i do.  I do not know whether mutt has
some hook which allows direct start of a browser for a given thing
you see in the pager.

(Btw., a couple of years ago i watched a video of Russ Cox
describing how he works with the Acme editor in Plan9(Port), and
there it shows how efficient mouse copy+paste can be.  It is [1].
Near the end i think he worked a bit.  Btw. the Plan9 Rio terminal
/ rc shell did not even have a history, it is all done via
scrolling, and copy + paste.  Not my thing, but if you can...)

  [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP1xVpMPn8M

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Karen Lewellen
I am not personally  keen on running a program that the administrator here 
at shellworld has not configured to work with their environment.
How does using a third party program keep mail history, contact lists, 
sent  mail etc., all from an existing gmail account?
It seems odd that I can use lynx perfectly with my main account, but my 
research one is blocked.




On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


A program called urlscan is used by mutt to do that and it honors the
BROWSER environment variable setting so if that's lynx urlscan will open
in lynx.
The https://wiki.archlinux.org/ page has help on setting mutt up and I
think urlscan is mentioned in that help or has its own help page.  An
older program called url-view was used by mutt but urlscan seems to have
replaced it.  There's a learning curve for mutt, learning what to put in
your configuration files and to set up macros but a script called
fleacollar.sh got written and if you run that and answer all questions
accurately it should make you useable configuration files for mutt.
I can send you a copy of that script but I'll not send that to lynx-dev.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:49:16
From: Karen Lewellen 
To: Jude DaShiell 
Cc: Mouse , lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

shellworld?
I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for
example?



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt can be
used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
From: Karen Lewellen 
To: Mouse 
Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use
elinks
and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my research
gmail
account.
They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right
kind
of JavaScript.
Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  Presently
although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a dos
ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
so  please share more details all the way around.



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:


gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,


My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.

I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.


and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.


If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
the stringency of their stance.)

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--






--




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Tim Chase
On 2019-11-05 15:49, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links
> for example?

Mutt outsources the following of links to an external program.  The
typical way is to pipe the message to the "urlscan" program
(there's also a "urlview" but it lacks some of the nice features
of "urlscan").  The "urlscan" program scrapes the body of the email
(or really, any input so it's not limited to launching URLs found in
emails, but any text input) for all URLs it contains, presents them
to you with context, and lets you open them in whatever browser you
have configured, including lynx (bringing this back full-circle to
this mailing-list).

Similarly, mutt can work in conjunction with your mailcap file to
open HTML attachments (such as multi-part MIME mail messages)
directly in your browser of choice (such as lynx) or transforming the
message into a text format like "lynx -dump" produces.  This same
mailcap functionality lets you set default programs for all manner of
attachments such as PDF files (perhaps sending them through
"pdftotext" or an OCR program), MS Word files (with catdoc, docx2txt,
antiword, pandoc, etc), and all manner of other attachment-types.

-tim




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Jude DaShiell
A program called urlscan is used by mutt to do that and it honors the
BROWSER environment variable setting so if that's lynx urlscan will open
in lynx.
The https://wiki.archlinux.org/ page has help on setting mutt up and I
think urlscan is mentioned in that help or has its own help page.  An
older program called url-view was used by mutt but urlscan seems to have
replaced it.  There's a learning curve for mutt, learning what to put in
your configuration files and to set up macros but a script called
fleacollar.sh got written and if you run that and answer all questions
accurately it should make you useable configuration files for mutt.
I can send you a copy of that script but I'll not send that to lynx-dev.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:49:16
> From: Karen Lewellen 
> To: Jude DaShiell 
> Cc: Mouse , lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
>
> shellworld?
> I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
> How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for
> example?
>
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> > Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt can be
> > used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
> > of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
> >> From: Karen Lewellen 
> >> To: Mouse 
> >> Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
> >>
> >> The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use
> >> elinks
> >> and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my research
> >> gmail
> >> account.
> >> They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right
> >> kind
> >> of JavaScript.
> >> Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  Presently
> >> although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a dos
> >> ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
> >> so  please share more details all the way around.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:
> >>
> >>>> gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,
> >>>
> >>> My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
> >>> one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
> >>> horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
> >>> with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
> >>> installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
> >>> in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
> >>> onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
> >>> and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
> >>> I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.
> >>>
> >>> I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.
> >>>
> >>>> and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
> >>>> run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.
> >>>
> >>> If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
> >>> interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
> >>> mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
> >>> the stringency of their stance.)
> >>>
> >>> /~\ The ASCII   Mouse
> >>> \ / Ribbon Campaign
> >>> X  Against HTML   mo...@rodents-montreal.org
> >>> / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> Lynx-dev mailing list
> >>> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Lynx-dev mailing list
> >> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> >
>

-- 


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Karen Lewellen

shellworld?
I have no idea, as I have not needed to look.
How does mutt manage the need for a browser, to follow e-mail links for 
example?




On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Jude DaShiell wrote:


Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt can be
used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:


Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
From: Karen Lewellen 
To: Mouse 
Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use elinks
and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my research   gmail
account.
They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right kind
of JavaScript.
Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  Presently
although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a dos
ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
so  please share more details all the way around.



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:


gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,


My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.

I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.


and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.


If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
the stringency of their stance.)

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



--




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Mouse wrote in <201911051516.kaa27...@stone.rodents-montreal.org>:
 |> gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,
 |
 |My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
 |one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
 |horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
 |with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
 |installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
 |in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
 |onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
 |and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
 |I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.
 |
 |I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.
 |
 |> and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
 |> run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.
 |
 |If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
 |interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
 |mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
 |the stringency of their stance.)

Not DOS, but my BSD Mail clone inherited support for SMTP, POP3
and IMAP, and can talk to GMail if you allow access of "lesser
secure apps" (a term i personally refuse, since the connection is
TLS secured and the password is stored pretty safe here, i'd claim
safer than the auto-complete feature of the browser, but that may
not be true).  (I also assume you are not interested in giving
Google a mobile phone number.)  The manual contains
a configuration example for GMail even.
And in the meantime GMail even supports direct SMTPS etc., rather
than upgrade of SMTP via STARTTLS command.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Mouse
> This is not a client issue, as I am going directly to google for my
> gmail reading.

You're still using a client; it just may be a Web client rather than an
POP/IMAP/etc client.

> When I requested answers for accessibility reasons, one staff member
> duplicated the issue using elinks, and told me that it was because
> Google did not consider elinks to use the "right" kind of JavaScript.

The person who told you that either doesn't really understand
JavaScript or hopes you don't (more likely the former, I'd guess).  JS
consists of the Web page requesting that the browser fetch a bunch of
code from somewhere and run it.  (Strictly speaking, JS is the language
the "bunch of code" is written in.)  The only way speaking of the
"right kind" of JS makes any sense at all is for the person to have
been talking about different versions of either the language spec or
the client-side implementation, and that phrasing of it is
misleading-at-best in either case.

My guess is still as I sketched upthread: there's some kind of "which
implementation I am" value that's getting checked.  Most briefly, your
JS implementation is doing what Google asked it (via the Web page and
JS code) to do rather than what _you_ want it to do.

Also, I just (while typing this message) quit the lynx instance that I
was looking at my work email in and restarted it, re-loggin-in and all.
No issues.  So either there's something user-specific going on or
Google is lying.  (Gee, _there's_ a shocker of an idea.)

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Jude DaShiell
Has that shell service got mutt available?  Reason I ask is mutt can be
used to read and reply to gmail once set up correctly and there's lots
of support for setting it up with gmail on the internet.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:02:47
> From: Karen Lewellen 
> To: Mouse 
> Cc: lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
>
> The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use elinks
> and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my research   gmail
> account.
> They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right kind
> of JavaScript.
> Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  Presently
> although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a dos
> ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.
> so  please share more details all the way around.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:
>
> >> gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,
> >
> > My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
> > one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
> > horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
> > with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
> > installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
> > in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
> > onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
> > and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
> > I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.
> >
> > I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.
> >
> >> and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
> >> run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.
> >
> > If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
> > interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
> > mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
> > the stringency of their stance.)
> >
> > /~\ The ASCII Mouse
> > \ / Ribbon Campaign
> > X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
> > / \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
> >
> > ___
> > Lynx-dev mailing list
> > Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> >
>
> ___
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>

-- 


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Karen Lewellen

Actually, this is not correct.
I have gotten this duplicated by google accessibility  staff.  In fact 
Google  stated in an article recently that  since only crooks turn off 
JavaScript, they will not allow anyone  to sign into their gmail account 
without JavaScript.
When I requested answers for accessibility reasons, one staff member 
duplicated the issue using elinks, and told me that it was because Google 
did  not consider elinks  to use the "right" kind of JavaScript.
Later, a different staff member who normally uses links reported that they 
too   could no longer reach basic html using the browser.
This is not a client issue, as I am going directly to  google for my gmail 
reading.

Karen


On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:


The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to now I could use
elinks and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my
research gmail account.



They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the
right kind of JavaScript.  Generally speaking I too would love
learning how this is done.


This has to depend on something in your client.  Google cannot, after
all, observe anything about your client except its network behaviour;
something is provoking different network behaviour - or, possibly, your
client's blind trust in the JS Google is sending it is causing it to
refuse you locally without exhibiting _any_ network behaviour.

My guess would be that your JS implementation includes some kind of
"this is what sort of implementation I am" string, which Google is
asking it to send back - or, more stupidly but in my estimation a
little more likely, is checking somewhere in the JS code it sends to
you.  Learning details (without help from Google, which help I doubt
would be forthcoming) would probably require inspecting the JS it sends
and/or snooping the cleartext of the communication.  Neither one sounds
trivial to me, though.

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Mouse
> The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to now I could use
> elinks and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my
> research gmail account.

> They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the
> right kind of JavaScript.  Generally speaking I too would love
> learning how this is done.

This has to depend on something in your client.  Google cannot, after
all, observe anything about your client except its network behaviour;
something is provoking different network behaviour - or, possibly, your
client's blind trust in the JS Google is sending it is causing it to
refuse you locally without exhibiting _any_ network behaviour.

My guess would be that your JS implementation includes some kind of
"this is what sort of implementation I am" string, which Google is
asking it to send back - or, more stupidly but in my estimation a
little more likely, is checking somewhere in the JS code it sends to
you.  Learning details (without help from Google, which help I doubt
would be forthcoming) would probably require inspecting the JS it sends
and/or snooping the cleartext of the communication.  Neither one sounds
trivial to me, though.

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Karen Lewellen
The Thunderbird story is interesting because prior to  now I could use 
elinks  and links, which both can incorporate JavaScript to reach my 
research   gmail account.
They no longer allow it though because google claims it is not the right 
kind of JavaScript.
Generally speaking I too would love learning how this is done.  Presently 
although I use DOS, the only internet access I have comes from  using a 
dos ssh  telnet client to a shell service.  Nothing from my desktop.

so  please share more details all the way around.



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Mouse wrote:


gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,


My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.

I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.


and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.


If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
the stringency of their stance.)

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X  Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Tim Chase
[sorry, a little OT for the Lynx list as it wanders off into
mail-programs rather than using the Gmail web interface via lynx]

On 2019-11-05 10:16, Mouse wrote:
> > gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,  
> 
> My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are
> using one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling
> GUI horrors.

Both POP3 & IMAP are standards and I've had success accessing Gmail
from multiple utilities including alpine, mutt, and
offlineimap/mbsync, along with sending via msmtp.  Granted, most of
those aren't DOS tools.

The two elements I've found that are usually required though if
you're hitting a wall with them:

1) last I checked, Google only does SSL/TLS connections, so if your
mail program tries to access POP3/IMAP/SMTP over an unencrypted
connection, it will balk.  Fortunately, all the tools I mentioned
above support TLS (or upgrading an unencrypted connection to an
encrypted one with STARTTLS).  However, there are still some out
there (especially older code-bases that haven't been updated) that
assume that plain-text is fine for sending credentials & email over
the wire.  Please either upgrade your mail program, or use something
like offlineimap/mbsync (for IMAP) or fetchmail (for POP) that does
the TLS for you and syncs it to a local mbox/Maildir/MH folder which
your mail program should then be able to access locally without
concern for the encryption.

2) for Gmail, you need login access, either with an OAUTH-enabled
program, or by going into your Gmail settings and setting up an
"application specific password".  Far fewer tools support OAUTH for
login, so you'll likely have better success if you set up the
application password, at which point most mail programs just work as
expected when given the credentials & server info.

-Tim





___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Karen Lewellen
what I meant  was the specific tools the individual making this claim used 
for example yesterday to accomplish this goal.
To be sure the internet, more than servers, because I often must reach 
site content  from my research gmail address.
Meaning I need to read my gmail in  a browser most likely, as I do with my 
main  gmail account.
I did try using mail2web, once, to check the mail only to be  blocked.  I 
am  unsure if  something clearly third party would work  now, but am happy 
to be proven wrong.

Kare



On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, David Woolley wrote:


On 05/11/2019 06:30, Karen Lewellen wrote:

 In order  to do this, I must log in first. there in  lies the problem
 with google stating that my browser does not support JavaScript.
 may I ask what program you are using in dos, both to reach the Internet,


Do you mean the internet, or do you mean HTTP servers?  Internet access is 
generally provided by TSRs on MS-DOS, but it is long since I did it that I 
forget the details.



 and to reach gmail?


gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access, and it appears there are old versions of 
Pegasus Mail available, that run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows 
environment present.




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev



___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread dos lieber
Pegasus Mail for DOS (PMAIL.EXE ver 3.5) does not connect to any
Internet server or does IMAP or POP3. It is just a mail reader and
composer.

You need another program to do this. There are two or three to do this
but none does SSL, so now they are useless.

I still use Pegasus Mail for DOS to read newsgroups (NNTP) messages
that I download with the program for MS-DOS: Minuet.exe.

Alejandro Lieber
Rosario  Argentina
-

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Mouse
> gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access,

My experience is that gmail supports POP and IMAP only if you are using
one of a few blessed clients, all of which are huge crawling GUI
horrors.  Sometimes not even then; for example, back when I was fussing
with mail for work, gmail refused to talk to the Thunderbird that was
installed on my work laptop, claiming its encryption was insufficient
in some (unspecified, as far as I can recall) respect.  So I was forced
onto the HTML interface.  I've been using lynx with the basic HTML view
and it's been working for me, but perhaps I'm just being grandfathered;
I haven't meddled with the settings in quite a while now.

I really wish that job would move their mail to somewhere civilized.

> and it appears there are old versions of Pegasus Mail available, that
> run on MS-DOS and support these with no Windows environment present.

If one of them works, great, but don't be too surprised if gmail isn't
interested in talking to clients that old.  (If it does work, please
mention it here; I'd like to try again if it appears they've relaxed
the stringency of their stance.)

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread David Woolley

On 05/11/2019 06:30, Karen Lewellen wrote:
In order  to do this, I must log in first. there in  lies the problem 
with google stating that my browser does not support JavaScript.

may I ask what program you are using in dos, both to reach the Internet,


Do you mean the internet, or do you mean HTTP servers?  Internet access 
is generally provided by TSRs on MS-DOS, but it is long since I did it 
that I forget the details.



and to reach gmail?


gmail supports POP3 and IMAP access, and it appears there are old 
versions of Pegasus Mail available, that run on MS-DOS and support these 
with no Windows environment present.




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-05 Thread Alejandro Lieber

Karen:

You have to log once to gmail.com with any "normal" browser (Chromium, 
Chrome, Firefox). Select "basic HTML" at the bottom, and exit from the 
gmail account.


When you enter gmail with Links or Lynx, you will see that it asks you 
to enable JavaScript. Just continue login. Very important: you have to 
enter the password twice.


I don't use any special program in MS-DOS. Just log to gmail.com with a 
text browser, and do all my email in HTML.


I see you have a UNIX shell account.

I can also read my gmail email with Lynx for BSD in my shell account at 
SDF.ORG.



Alejandro Lieber

Rosario  Argentina

On 5/11/19 03:30, Karen Lewellen wrote:
In order  to do this, I must log in first. there in  lies the problem 
with google stating that my browser does not support JavaScript.
may I ask what program you are using in dos, both to reach the 
Internet, and to reach gmail?




On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, dos lieber wrote:


Karen:
Try setting your "research" account for "basic HTML" view.

After closing it, you will probably be able to open it with Links and 
Lynx.


I open gmail regularly with links and lynx in MS-DOS.

Alejandro Lieber
Rosario  Argentina

On 11/4/19, Karen Lewellen  wrote:

Hi folks,
Are there any tools that I can use to check gmail that insure a low
graphics experience?
While my main gmail account can still reach  basic html in lynx, my
research  based one  cannot..google removed access from my home 
computer.

is there a third party tool that  will work?
I could previously use links and e-links, but google has decided,
JavaScript only means their JavaScript. Oh and stated in the press, 
only

crooks turn off JavaScript.
Thanks for any ideas,
Karen


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev




--
==
Ing. Alejandro Lieber
Rosario Argentina
==




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-04 Thread Karen Lewellen
In order  to do this, I must log in first. there in  lies the problem with 
google stating that my browser does not support JavaScript.
may I ask what program you are using in dos, both to reach the Internet, 
and to reach gmail?




On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, dos lieber wrote:


Karen:
Try setting your "research" account for "basic HTML" view.

After closing it, you will probably be able to open it with Links and Lynx.

I open gmail regularly with links and lynx in MS-DOS.

Alejandro Lieber
Rosario  Argentina

On 11/4/19, Karen Lewellen  wrote:

Hi folks,
Are there any tools that I can use to check gmail that insure a low
graphics experience?
While my main gmail account can still reach  basic html in lynx, my
research  based one  cannot..google removed access from my home computer.
is there a third party tool that  will work?
I could previously use links and e-links, but google has decided,
JavaScript only means their JavaScript. Oh and stated in the press, only
crooks turn off JavaScript.
Thanks for any ideas,
Karen


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev




--
==
Ing. Alejandro Lieber
Rosario Argentina
==




___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-04 Thread dos lieber
Karen:
Try setting your "research" account for "basic HTML" view.

After closing it, you will probably be able to open it with Links and Lynx.

I open gmail regularly with links and lynx in MS-DOS.

Alejandro Lieber
Rosario  Argentina

On 11/4/19, Karen Lewellen  wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Are there any tools that I can use to check gmail that insure a low
> graphics experience?
> While my main gmail account can still reach  basic html in lynx, my
> research  based one  cannot..google removed access from my home computer.
> is there a third party tool that  will work?
> I could previously use links and e-links, but google has decided,
> JavaScript only means their JavaScript. Oh and stated in the press, only
> crooks turn off JavaScript.
> Thanks for any ideas,
> Karen
>
>
> ___
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>


-- 
==
Ing. Alejandro Lieber
Rosario Argentina
==

___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


[Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?

2019-11-04 Thread Karen Lewellen

Hi folks,
Are there any tools that I can use to check gmail that insure a low 
graphics experience?
While my main gmail account can still reach  basic html in lynx, my 
research  based one  cannot..google removed access from my home computer.

is there a third party tool that  will work?
I could previously use links and e-links, but google has decided, 
JavaScript only means their JavaScript. Oh and stated in the press, only 
crooks turn off JavaScript.

Thanks for any ideas,
Karen


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev