Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 15:50:04 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Maybe too much. Checking LaTeXConfig.lyx for aguplus.layout > > previously I had > > Found: yes, no > > now I have > > Found: yes, yes > > The second yes is for agums.sty, but this is wrong, because not > > installed here. > > I think you overshot it. Many styles are not second-level dependencies, > e.g. beamerarticle, beamerposter and the clo styles some classes > provide. > > I propose you revert and we remove second-level dependencies on a > layout-by-layout basis. > > Jürgen OK. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Maybe too much. Checking LaTeXConfig.lyx for aguplus.layout > previously I had > Found: yes, no > now I have > Found: yes, yes > The second yes is for agums.sty, but this is wrong, because not > installed here. I think you overshot it. Many styles are not second-level dependencies, e.g. beamerarticle, beamerposter and the clo styles some classes provide. I propose you revert and we remove second-level dependencies on a layout-by-layout basis. Jürgen > > Kornel > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 14:22:50 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 13:21:22 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > : > > Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in > > > case of MikTeX, > > > otherwise I cannot see why Uwe added 'suffix.sty' in > > > 51cea817100d451981763b2c66185cc35a9726f3, > > > or 'answers.sty' in 5002ef33f03fdd5a7e401b6dd36285e2e4dee004. > > > > Yes, they have been added for the sake of MikTeX, and we have decided > > some time ago to remove them (the windows installer should roll its own > > list for MikTeX if required). > > > > These second-level dependencies are never fixed, and thus not really > > predictable and maintainable. > > > > Jürgen > > > > Committed at 92c8a86. Hopefully nobody screams. > Maybe too much. Checking LaTeXConfig.lyx for aguplus.layout previously I had Found: yes, no now I have Found: yes, yes The second yes is for agums.sty, but this is wrong, because not installed here. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: lib/examples/aas_sample.lyx uncompilable with TL18
Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 14:08 +0200 schrieb Jean-Pierre: > It's more complicated, AFAIR aas_sample.laas_sample.lyx compiles > with > aastex62.cls, but the outpuoutput is wrong. Then we also need a new template, I suppose, that is fit for aastex62 (and keep the old one for the old class). Jürgen > > -- > Jean-Pierre > > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 13:21:22 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in > > case of MikTeX, > > otherwise I cannot see why Uwe added 'suffix.sty' in > > 51cea817100d451981763b2c66185cc35a9726f3, > > or 'answers.sty' in 5002ef33f03fdd5a7e401b6dd36285e2e4dee004. > > Yes, they have been added for the sake of MikTeX, and we have decided > some time ago to remove them (the windows installer should roll its own > list for MikTeX if required). > > These second-level dependencies are never fixed, and thus not really > predictable and maintainable. > > Jürgen > Committed at 92c8a86. Hopefully nobody screams. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: lib/examples/aas_sample.lyx uncompilable with TL18
Le 7 juillet 2018 13:24:45 Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: Then there will still be missing a solution for aastex62.cls Why? Just add the respectice aastex62.layout file. It's more complicated, AFAIR aas_sample.laas_sample.lyx compiles with aastex62.cls, but the outpuoutput is wrong. -- Jean-Pierre
Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?
On 07/07/2018 00:07, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: OK, I finally found some time to mess with this again. A new version of the installer has been uploaded to http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0/. The problem with spellcheck was because some dictionaries were supposed to be installed by default, but there was no actual provision for including them in the package, from what I can tell. Special sauce, I guess. There were also some major problems downloading dictionaries during the installation. The URLs were simply wrong. I fixed that and simplified some of the code. Finally, there was the 'style' issue. We now install the qwindowsvistastyle.dll file, as Enrico suggested. Apparently, it is new in Qt 5.10 that these are separate files [1]. That's why the old installer worked, I guess. It was built with 5.9.x. Anyway, I have verified that starting LyX with: LyX2.3.exe -style windows LyX2.3.exe -style windowsvista give different results. Please test, and hopefully we can finish with this next week. Riki [1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-65177 Thanks! Works and looks fine for me so far. One very minor thing probably not worth spending much time on: there is no add/remove programs icon. I only found this which might not even apply: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16204889/how-to-change-the-icon-in-add-or-remove-programs Best, Daniel
Re: lib/examples/aas_sample.lyx uncompilable with TL18
Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Then there will still be missing a solution for aastex62.cls Why? Just add the respectice aastex62.layout file. Jürgen > > Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in > case of MikTeX, > otherwise I cannot see why Uwe added 'suffix.sty' in > 51cea817100d451981763b2c66185cc35a9726f3, > or 'answers.sty' in 5002ef33f03fdd5a7e401b6dd36285e2e4dee004. Yes, they have been added for the sake of MikTeX, and we have decided some time ago to remove them (the windows installer should roll its own list for MikTeX if required). These second-level dependencies are never fixed, and thus not really predictable and maintainable. Jürgen > > Kornel > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: lib/examples/aas_sample.lyx uncompilable with TL18
Am Dienstag, 12. Juni 2018 21:01:13 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
:
> >
> > Could we create a aastex layout which is independent of the aastex version?
> >
> > (Preferably maybe with help of \IfFileExists{filename}?)
> >
>
> I would not do that. These are two distinct classes.
>
> Jürgen
>
>
Then there will still be missing a solution for aastex62.cls
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: math.bind: add keybindings for \widehat, \tilde, and \widetilde
Am Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2018 23:56:08 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2018 16:03:45 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak > : > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:48:56AM +, Stephan Witt wrote: > > > > > > Still, I like the idea with 'M-m q' as prefix for extra bindings. > > > > > > Me too. :) > > > > Sounds good. In addition to "q", "j" and "k" seem to be free. Any reason > > to choose one over the other? > > Apart from not finding a word describing 'wide'? Only 'q' (for quad) suggests > something big. > From=20the alphanumeric there is also [0-79z] free. > > > Any abstractions that come to mind that are related? > > No, sorry > > > For example, how > > about the following? > > > > \bind "M-m q i" "math-insert \iint" > > \bind "M-m q y" "math-insert \oiint" > > \bind "M-m q ~S-period" "math-insert \ddot" > > \bind "M-m q ~S-parenleft""math-bigdelim bigl ( bigr )" > > > > Note that \ddot is already bound to <<">>, which does seem intuitive. > > Nonetheless, using "M-m q" would allow us to free <<">> if we wanted to > > use it for something else. > > Yes. > > > Scott > Scott, I propose you commit it. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2018 17:49:32 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 07/06/2018 04:13 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 22:38:08 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > > : > >> On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > >>> Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. > Since there are that many, maybe it would be more handy to handle > them when they become invalid :( > >>> Or just handle them subsequently. > >> Should be easy to write a perl script that would list dependencies. > >> > > Sure, but are you sure it is _always_ OK? > > I meant just to help us check what needs fixing. Lots of unnecessary > dependencies got added along the way. > > Riki > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in case of MikTeX, otherwise I cannot see why Uwe added 'suffix.sty' in 51cea817100d451981763b2c66185cc35a9726f3, or 'answers.sty' in 5002ef33f03fdd5a7e401b6dd36285e2e4dee004. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?
Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > The problem with spellcheck was because some dictionaries were supposed > to be installed by default, but there was no actual provision for > including them in the package, from what I can tell. Special sauce, I > guess. There were also some major problems downloading dictionaries > during the installation. The URLs were simply wrong. I fixed that and > simplified some of the code. My understanding was that all the dictionaries were fixed part of the installer and nothing was to be downloaded during the installation. For that purpose all thesauri and dictionaries were stored at https://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxsvn/dictionaries and irregularly updated. If Uwe still used them I do not know. Do you have some script or completele notes how to build the current installer? Pavel
