Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-14 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 07/14/2018 02:59 AM, Daniel wrote:
> On 07/07/2018 00:07, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> OK, I finally found some time to mess with this again. A new version of
>> the installer has been uploaded to
>> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0/.
>>
>> The problem with spellcheck was because some dictionaries were supposed
>> to be installed by default, but there was no actual provision for
>> including them in the package, from what I can tell. Special sauce, I
>> guess. There were also some major problems downloading dictionaries
>> during the installation. The URLs were simply wrong. I fixed that and
>> simplified some of the code.
>>
>> Finally, there was the 'style' issue. We now install the
>> qwindowsvistastyle.dll file, as Enrico suggested. Apparently, it is new
>> in Qt 5.10 that these are separate files [1]. That's why the old
>> installer worked, I guess. It was built with 5.9.x. Anyway, I have
>> verified that starting LyX with:
>>
>>  LyX2.3.exe -style windows
>>  LyX2.3.exe -style windowsvista
>>
>> give different results.
>>
>> Please test, and hopefully we can finish with this next week
> Is there a reason why Qt 5.10 instead of 5.11 was used? Qt 5.11 seems
> to have a nice fix for windows users:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-43190

Qt 5.10 is what mingw currently provides on Fedora.

Riki



Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-14 Thread Daniel

On 07/07/2018 00:07, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:

OK, I finally found some time to mess with this again. A new version of
the installer has been uploaded to http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0/.

The problem with spellcheck was because some dictionaries were supposed
to be installed by default, but there was no actual provision for
including them in the package, from what I can tell. Special sauce, I
guess. There were also some major problems downloading dictionaries
during the installation. The URLs were simply wrong. I fixed that and
simplified some of the code.

Finally, there was the 'style' issue. We now install the
qwindowsvistastyle.dll file, as Enrico suggested. Apparently, it is new
in Qt 5.10 that these are separate files [1]. That's why the old
installer worked, I guess. It was built with 5.9.x. Anyway, I have
verified that starting LyX with:

     LyX2.3.exe -style windows
     LyX2.3.exe -style windowsvista

give different results.

Please test, and hopefully we can finish with this next week
Is there a reason why Qt 5.10 instead of 5.11 was used? Qt 5.11 seems to 
have a nice fix for windows users: 
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-43190


Daniel