Re: New 2.3.5-1 Tarballs
Am Mi., 3. Juni 2020 um 23:17 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > Because of my screwup with the date and some missing example files, we > need to rebuild the binaries from new tarballs. I decided to go ahead and > rename the tarball, too, for safety. > > The new tarballs are here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > as usual. > I am not sure about the LyX version in these tarballs. Please find attached what a screenshot of lyx.rc says to me. Should I package it as "LyX-235-Installer-2..." or "LyX-2351-Installer-2..."? Eugene -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
New 2.3.5-1 Tarballs
Because of my screwup with the date and some missing example files, we need to rebuild the binaries from new tarballs. I decided to go ahead and rename the tarball, too, for safety. The new tarballs are here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ as usual. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Date Wrong in Tarballs [Re: [LyX/2.3.x] Prepare for 2.3.5]
On 6/3/20 5:04 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 6/3/20 3:53 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:21:03 -0400 >> schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : >> >>> On 6/3/20 10:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:12:54PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Monday, 1 June 2020 18.47.30 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> # Use ISO format only. The frontend needs to parse this >> -AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-01-26"]) >> +AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-06-21"]) > Hi Riki, > I am curious about this. Did you apply a permutation to get the new > date. > ;-) There are the same digits but in a different order. :-) > > Thank you for the new release. Indeed, it is a very efficient release. Only one swap needed. I hope they used std::swap to get move semantics. >>> Actually, the date is wrong, of course, as a user pointed out. >>> >>> I hate to ask people to repackage just for this, but I probably have to >>> do so? >>> >>> Riki >>> >>> >> Re-packaging needed also because of missing some example files in cmake >> build :( > Do we know why? Feel free to commit a patch if you can. Whoops, saw you did. Thanks! Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Date Wrong in Tarballs [Re: [LyX/2.3.x] Prepare for 2.3.5]
On 6/3/20 1:46 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 03.06.2020 um 18:21 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : >> On 6/3/20 10:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:12:54PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Monday, 1 June 2020 18.47.30 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > # Use ISO format only. The frontend needs to parse this > -AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-01-26"]) > +AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-06-21"]) Hi Riki, I am curious about this. Did you apply a permutation to get the new date. ;-) There are the same digits but in a different order. :-) Thank you for the new release. >>> Indeed, it is a very efficient release. Only one swap needed. I hope >>> they used std::swap to get move semantics. >> Actually, the date is wrong, of course, as a user pointed out. >> >> I hate to ask people to repackage just for this, but I probably have to >> do so? > I’d have no problem to repackage the Mac application. OK. As there's been no official release, I'm not going to change the package number. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Date Wrong in Tarballs [Re: [LyX/2.3.x] Prepare for 2.3.5]
On 6/3/20 3:53 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:21:03 -0400 > schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > >> On 6/3/20 10:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:12:54PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Monday, 1 June 2020 18.47.30 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > # Use ISO format only. The frontend needs to parse this > -AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-01-26"]) > +AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-06-21"]) Hi Riki, I am curious about this. Did you apply a permutation to get the new date. ;-) There are the same digits but in a different order. :-) Thank you for the new release. >>> Indeed, it is a very efficient release. Only one swap needed. I hope >>> they used std::swap to get move semantics. >> Actually, the date is wrong, of course, as a user pointed out. >> >> I hate to ask people to repackage just for this, but I probably have to >> do so? >> >> Riki >> >> > Re-packaging needed also because of missing some example files in cmake build > :( Do we know why? Feel free to commit a patch if you can. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Date Wrong in Tarballs [Re: [LyX/2.3.x] Prepare for 2.3.5]
Am Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:21:03 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 6/3/20 10:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:12:54PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > >> On Monday, 1 June 2020 18.47.30 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >>> # Use ISO format only. The frontend needs to parse this > >>> -AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-01-26"]) > >>> +AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-06-21"]) > >> Hi Riki, > >> I am curious about this. Did you apply a permutation to get the new > >> date. > >> ;-) There are the same digits but in a different order. :-) > >> > >> Thank you for the new release. > > Indeed, it is a very efficient release. Only one swap needed. I hope > > they used std::swap to get move semantics. > > Actually, the date is wrong, of course, as a user pointed out. > > I hate to ask people to repackage just for this, but I probably have to > do so? > > Riki > > Re-packaging needed also because of missing some example files in cmake build :( Kornel pgp46rwSeJWnf.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Date Wrong in Tarballs [Re: [LyX/2.3.x] Prepare for 2.3.5]
Am 03.06.2020 um 18:21 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > > On 6/3/20 10:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:12:54PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: >>> On Monday, 1 June 2020 18.47.30 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: # Use ISO format only. The frontend needs to parse this -AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-01-26"]) +AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-06-21"]) >>> Hi Riki, >>> I am curious about this. Did you apply a permutation to get the new date. >>> ;-) There are the same digits but in a different order. :-) >>> >>> Thank you for the new release. >> Indeed, it is a very efficient release. Only one swap needed. I hope >> they used std::swap to get move semantics. > > Actually, the date is wrong, of course, as a user pointed out. > > I hate to ask people to repackage just for this, but I probably have to > do so? I’d have no problem to repackage the Mac application. Stephan -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Windows Installer to Test
On 6/3/20 9:50 AM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Mi., 3. Juni 2020 um 04:03 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: > > I've put the Windows installer for 2.3.5 here > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > for testing. Please let me know if there are any issues. I am > hoping to > release Thursday. > > > There is something strange with the pdfview. If a user clicks on > preview (CTRL + R), pdfview is supposed to close an already open adobe > reader window with that preview document (which is in a temp folder > there) and open a new window automatically. With your installer it > does not work, it then just says "unable to write to file.pdf". I'm > not sure how exactly you compiled the pdfview, but I can see that it > is missing the embedded "System.dll" (by opening it with 7zip as an > archive), maybe it's because Windows/Linux NSIS cross platform > compatibility is not so great (I have seen someone stating that on the > web somewhere). If not too much trouble, could you please find the > pdfview.exe from my drive folder and replace it in your installer? This was working before, I thought. But yes, I'll grab that binary. FYI, I do the NSIS build on Windows. But not for long, I hope... Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Date Wrong in Tarballs [Re: [LyX/2.3.x] Prepare for 2.3.5]
On 6/3/20 10:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:12:54PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: >> On Monday, 1 June 2020 18.47.30 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >>> # Use ISO format only. The frontend needs to parse this >>> -AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-01-26"]) >>> +AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-06-21"]) >> Hi Riki, >> I am curious about this. Did you apply a permutation to get the new date. >> ;-) There are the same digits but in a different order. :-) >> >> Thank you for the new release. > Indeed, it is a very efficient release. Only one swap needed. I hope > they used std::swap to get move semantics. Actually, the date is wrong, of course, as a user pointed out. I hate to ask people to repackage just for this, but I probably have to do so? Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: [LyX/2.3.x] Prepare for 2.3.5
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:12:54PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Monday, 1 June 2020 18.47.30 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > # Use ISO format only. The frontend needs to parse this > > -AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-01-26"]) > > +AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-06-21"]) > > Hi Riki, > I am curious about this. Did you apply a permutation to get the new date. > ;-) There are the same digits but in a different order. :-) > > Thank you for the new release. Indeed, it is a very efficient release. Only one swap needed. I hope they used std::swap to get move semantics. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: [LyX/2.3.x] Prepare for 2.3.5
On Monday, 1 June 2020 18.47.30 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > # Use ISO format only. The frontend needs to parse this > -AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-01-26"]) > +AC_SUBST(LYX_DATE, ["2020-06-21"]) Hi Riki, I am curious about this. Did you apply a permutation to get the new date. ;-) There are the same digits but in a different order. :-) Thank you for the new release. -- José Abílio -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Windows Installer to Test
Am Mi., 3. Juni 2020 um 04:03 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > I've put the Windows installer for 2.3.5 here > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > for testing. Please let me know if there are any issues. I am hoping to > release Thursday. > There is something strange with the pdfview. If a user clicks on preview (CTRL + R), pdfview is supposed to close an already open adobe reader window with that preview document (which is in a temp folder there) and open a new window automatically. With your installer it does not work, it then just says "unable to write to file.pdf". I'm not sure how exactly you compiled the pdfview, but I can see that it is missing the embedded "System.dll" (by opening it with 7zip as an archive), maybe it's because Windows/Linux NSIS cross platform compatibility is not so great (I have seen someone stating that on the web somewhere). If not too much trouble, could you please find the pdfview.exe from my drive folder and replace it in your installer? Eugene -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
