Re: #11821: Lyx and OS/2

2023-05-04 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 07:30:13PM +0200, Elbert Pol wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> Ok the Qt6 also build even with the svgwidget.
> As build with Qt6 it's not complaining about it.
> 
> I found that i had a bad option in mine CMD file...
> -DUSE_QT=QT6 must be -DLYX_USE_QT=QT6
> It's compiling fine ...
> 
> Only install cannot find some off the .GMO files
> 
> Also i see when starting lyx it cannot find, article.cls, calc sty,
> lambda.sty, lyxskak.sty, pst-node.sty

Hi Elbert,

Thanks for those details.

I'm not sure what the problem is. Did you try Tools > reconfigure?

Best,
Scott
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:00:27PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> > Also as I mentioned in other subthread, would you mind posting the
> > current
> > version of /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml in fedora (please make sure
> > you
> > did not tweak the file on your own :)?
> 
> The file is /etc/ImageMagick-7/policy.xml and follows attached.

Thanks, Fedora clearly choses to walk on the wild side.
Pavel
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:06:12PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 16:31 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Please edit the page, no one will know better than you. P
> 
> That can be done, the issue is if there is any place where this is
> missing.
> 
> The issue here is that since our code tries to be resilient sometimes
> that is a bad thing. :-)
> 
> That is some of our code fails and we try an alternative and the
> original failure, even if by accident, never gets fixed.
> 
> I hope that you understand what I mean because I agree that the above
> text is very hermetic. :-D

I do :) Anyway I believe that my original point - that you are the
one who can best assess the python situation - still remains valid.

If Riki intends(?) to use that wiki page it has to be cleared out
at certain moment.

Pavel
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread José Matos
On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 16:31 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Please edit the page, no one will know better than you. P

That can be done, the issue is if there is any place where this is
missing.

The issue here is that since our code tries to be resilient sometimes
that is a bad thing. :-)

That is some of our code fails and we try an alternative and the
original failure, even if by accident, never gets fixed.

I hope that you understand what I mean because I agree that the above
text is very hermetic. :-D
-- 
José Abílio
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread José Matos
On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 11:21 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 09:39:26PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck
> wrote:
> > I'm planning to manage the release. Now that classes are over here,
> > I will
> > have some time. The big questions are about what still needs doing.
> 
> Great to hear that. So back to the original question - Jose, if you
> have a
> spare hand, helping with sorting out bugs in trac is probably best
> way how 
> to speed up the process...

Got it.

> Also as I mentioned in other subthread, would you mind posting the
> current
> version of /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml in fedora (please make sure
> you
> did not tweak the file on your own :)?
> 
> Pavel

The file is /etc/ImageMagick-7/policy.xml and follows attached.


-- 
José Abílio


policy.xml
Description: XML document
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

Le 02/05/2023 à 16:12, Pavel Sanda a écrit :

One thing I'd like to do before release is to merge Text.cpp Text2.cpp and
Text3.cpp into a single file. It is so annoying to try to guess in which
file something is defined. Would somebody be against this ?


I was wondering myself if we should merge those one day and I support this move.


I did that now.

JMarc

--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Stephan Witt
> Am 04.05.2023 um 11:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> 
> Le 04/05/2023 à 03:39, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
>> The big issue is the OSX shortcut bug, which I'm still not clear about. I 
>> don't think anything else is a must-have.
> 
> This one can be solved for now by building with Qt5, right?

Yes, that’s my plan.

> Is there anything good enough on Qt6 for macOS that makes this a bad option?

I don’t think so. The only bad thing is to not switch major Qt release with 
„major“ LyX release.

Stephan

> It might be that the problem will solve itself with time.
> 
> JMarc
> 
> -- 
> lyx-devel mailing list
> lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
> http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

Le 04/05/2023 à 03:39, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
The big issue is the OSX shortcut bug, which I'm still not clear about. 
I don't think anything else is a must-have.


This one can be solved for now by building with Qt5, right? Is there 
anything good enough on Qt6 for macOS that makes this a bad option?


It might be that the problem will solve itself with time.

JMarc

--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 09:39:26PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> I'm planning to manage the release. Now that classes are over here, I will
> have some time. The big questions are about what still needs doing.

Great to hear that. So back to the original question - Jose, if you have a
spare hand, helping with sorting out bugs in trac is probably best way how 
to speed up the process...

Also as I mentioned in other subthread, would you mind posting the current
version of /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml in fedora (please make sure you
did not tweak the file on your own :)?

Pavel
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel