Re: OK to move Fullscreen preferences?

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Le 05/05/2023 à 19:26, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :

Le 05/05/2023 à 18:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :

Yuriy has a patch here:

   https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12124#comment:2

Any objection?

It's a bit weird that we have Editing > Control and then inside of 
that we have another "Editing" section and "Fullscreen" section. To me 
that's a signal that the "Fullscreen" section is out of place.


Make sense. I would have put it in Display subsection, though.


Sorry, I pushed it by mistake, and then reverted.

JMarc

--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: New warning (or at least I only noticed it now)

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Le 21/11/2022 à 08:34, José Matos a écrit :

Hi,
   I have been compiling and running 2.4 compiled with the latest
preview of gcc 13.

I got a new warning:
"note: the temporary was destroyed at the end of the full expression"


I managed to solve cleanly the ones related to Converter class at 3ae5d6bd.

I still think that these warning are more annoying than useful.

JMarc

--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: OK to move Fullscreen preferences?

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Le 05/05/2023 à 18:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :

Yuriy has a patch here:

   https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12124#comment:2

Any objection?

It's a bit weird that we have Editing > Control and then inside of that we have another "Editing" 
section and "Fullscreen" section. To me that's a signal that the "Fullscreen" section is out 
of place.


Make sense. I would have put it in Display subsection, though.

JMarc

--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: [PATCH] "Here Applies" module

[Scott Kostyshak]

On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 12:18:32PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 5/2/23 11:38, madmurphy wrote:
> > The hereapplies  LaTeX package has
> > stably been part of the CTAN repository for a while now, and a LyX
> > module
> > 
> > is shipped with it. Will it be possible to include the module among the
> > modules installed by LyX?
> 
> I don't see why not. Anyone else have an opinion?

Some thoughts:

1. Thanks for the work on the package and LyX module, madmurphy!

2. I think in the past we usually we ask that modules be put on the LyX wiki 
and marinate a bit. However, I think it might be fine to skip that step if the 
module is developed by the same author as the .sty file. For some reason, that 
gives me more confidence.

3. Another point in favor of including the module is that in 2.4.x the modules 
are organized into categories. I would be more hesitant for 2.3.x to add 
another module to the list that we're not sure there's much demand for. But 
because of the categories I'm not concerned as much about increasing complexity 
of the modules list.

Scott


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: [PATCH] "Here Applies" module

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 5/2/23 11:38, madmurphy wrote:
The hereapplies  LaTeX package has 
stably been part of the CTAN repository for a while now, and a LyX 
module 
 
is shipped with it. Will it be possible to include the module among 
the modules installed by LyX?


I don't see why not. Anyone else have an opinion?

Riki

-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 5/4/23 12:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:

On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:00:27PM +0100, José Matos wrote:

Also as I mentioned in other subthread, would you mind posting the
current
version of /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml in fedora (please make sure
you
did not tweak the file on your own :)?

The file is /etc/ImageMagick-7/policy.xml and follows attached.

Thanks, Fedora clearly choses to walk on the wild side.


This sounds like the biggest issue left. Is GraphicsMagick an option, or 
does it have the same issues?


Riki

[1] http://www.graphicsmagick.org/


--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 5/4/23 06:39, Stephan Witt wrote:

Am 04.05.2023 um 11:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :

Le 04/05/2023 à 03:39, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :

The big issue is the OSX shortcut bug, which I'm still not clear about. I don't 
think anything else is a must-have.

This one can be solved for now by building with Qt5, right?

Yes, that’s my plan.


OK, so not a blocker.

Riki


--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

OK to move Fullscreen preferences?

[Scott Kostyshak]

Yuriy has a patch here:

  https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12124#comment:2

Any objection?

It's a bit weird that we have Editing > Control and then inside of that we have 
another "Editing" section and "Fullscreen" section. To me that's a signal that 
the "Fullscreen" section is out of place.

Scott


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel