Re: Unicode characters in mathed
Le 30/05/2023 à 00:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Thanks for your input, this is the direction I would take if I ever find the time to solve this issue. This is now ticket #12788. https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12788 JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Unicode characters in mathed
Le 30/05/2023 à 00:14, Udicoudco a écrit : So how should I solve problem 1/ ? I see 3 solutions a/ replace ≠ with a \neq directly in the document at input time; we might not want to do that in case we eventually use unicode in math too b/ replace ≠ with a \neq on screen only c/ keep the ≠ on screen, but use the mathrel math class from \neq so that we have a good spacing I would say option b, as unicode-math supports unicode characters inside math mode. Maybe some users would prefer a latex source that contains the unicode symbols and not the corresponding macros. Thanks for your input, this is the direction I would take if I ever find the time to solve this issue. JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Unicode characters in mathed
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 4:10 PM Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > In particular, instead of typing \neq in mathed, why not copy and paste > a ≠ from some PDF or HTML page? > > When doing this, two things happen : > 1/ on screen, there is no spacing around the ≠ > 2/ in LaTeX output, the character is exported as \neq and all is well > > So how should I solve problem 1/ ? I see 3 solutions > a/ replace ≠ with a \neq directly in the document at input time; we > might not want to do that in case we eventually use unicode in math too > b/ replace ≠ with a \neq on screen only > c/ keep the ≠ on screen, but use the mathrel math class from \neq so > that we have a good spacing I would say option b, as unicode-math supports unicode characters inside math mode. Maybe some users would prefer a latex source that contains the unicode symbols and not the corresponding macros. Ot maybe a better solution would be to add a checkbox in Document->Settings->Math Options and let the user decide between option a and option b. but that would probably require more work. > -- > lyx-devel mailing list > lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org > http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?
On 2023-05-04 12:39, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 04.05.2023 um 11:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : Le 04/05/2023 à 03:39, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : The big issue is the OSX shortcut bug, which I'm still not clear about. I don't think anything else is a must-have. This one can be solved for now by building with Qt5, right? Yes, that’s my plan. Is there anything good enough on Qt6 for macOS that makes this a bad option? I don’t think so. The only bad thing is to not switch major Qt release with „major“ LyX release. Qt 5 has some strange graphical glitches on macOS. For example, suddenly appearing colored lines between tabs. It's not great but I guess there is not much of an alternative. Daniel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
