Re: -geometry
On 2/28/24 08:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 21/12/2023 à 03:01, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : LyX refuses to start if the -geometry argument is given and QPA_XCB is defined. I would guess we should just issue a warning and continue. Actually, I do not understand why we have QPA_XCB. A same Linux binary should be able to run with either xcb or Wayland. I guess some parts should be guarded by the availability of xcb headers, and other parts should be guarded by plain ``if (platformName() == "xcb")''. No idea myself. But I did fix the not starting problem. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Font sizes with Wayland
On 2/28/24 09:39, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: Dear developers I was quite bored by the small size of fonts in the upper area of the LyX window (menus and such) with Wayland. I did not find a way to increase them, might be a window manager tuning, I guess. Recently I switched back to a classical Xorg window manager ans I was quite pleased to see the usual fonts sizes I has before Wayland became the implicit WM on Debian. Just to let you know, no action required. I've seen a lot of glitches with Wayland as well. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Mark utf8x as "deprecated" ?
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:40:39PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 28/02/2024 à 02:11, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > That is indeed good to know. I don't think we should remove the support, > > just signal to the user that it's not recommended anymore. > > Then "obsolete" might be a better wording (deprecated means to me that we > plan to ditch it). Ah yes that is a very good point. Also "deprecated" doesn't signal whether LyX is planning to deprecate support (not the case) or whether it is just referring to the state of upstream TeX. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Mark utf8x as "deprecated" ?
Le 28/02/2024 à 02:11, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : That is indeed good to know. I don't think we should remove the support, just signal to the user that it's not recommended anymore. Then "obsolete" might be a better wording (deprecated means to me that we plan to ditch it). JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Mark utf8x as "deprecated" ?
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:06:24AM +, José Matos wrote: > On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 20:11 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > That is indeed good to know. I don't think we should remove the > > support, > > just signal to the user that it's not recommended anymore. > > > > Scott > > Honestly, I suspect, it probably means that since it works the authors > do not care. :-) I think you're right, although I wonder if it will continue to work. > So probably the first step is to signal that to developers/writers and > to see if that it is still needed or a remnant from the past... > > I am becoming nostalgic with time. :-D Fair enough ;). Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Font sizes with Wayland
Dear developers I was quite bored by the small size of fonts in the upper area of the LyX window (menus and such) with Wayland. I did not find a way to increase them, might be a window manager tuning, I guess. Recently I switched back to a classical Xorg window manager ans I was quite pleased to see the usual fonts sizes I has before Wayland became the implicit WM on Debian. Just to let you know, no action required. -- Jean-Pierre -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: -geometry
Le 21/12/2023 à 03:01, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : LyX refuses to start if the -geometry argument is given and QPA_XCB is defined. I would guess we should just issue a warning and continue. Actually, I do not understand why we have QPA_XCB. A same Linux binary should be able to run with either xcb or Wayland. I guess some parts should be guarded by the availability of xcb headers, and other parts should be guarded by plain ``if (platformName() == "xcb")''. JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Can't create a macro with 2.4.0~devel
Le 28/02/2024 à 13:01, JP a écrit : Le 28 février 2024 12:03:58 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 28/02/2024 à 11:51, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : Le 27/02/2024 à 07:51, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Indeed, insetAllowed forbids it for some reason. However the insertion is not guarded correctly. I do not want to fix this now, I have first to fix the crash The copy works and the crash is gone. Thanks! Hmm, what copy works? From English Math.lyx to French Math.lyx. OK, thanks. JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Can't create a macro with 2.4.0~devel
Le 28 février 2024 12:03:58 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 28/02/2024 à 11:51, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : Le 27/02/2024 à 07:51, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Indeed, insetAllowed forbids it for some reason. However the insertion is not guarded correctly. I do not want to fix this now, I have first to fix the crash The copy works and the crash is gone. Thanks! Hmm, what copy works? From English Math.lyx to French Math.lyx. -- Jean-Pierre -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Can't create a macro with 2.4.0~devel
Le 27/02/2024 à 18:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : I can't imagine why one would actually want to do this. Maybe it was too complicated to figure out the macro scope? Let's keep it like that. JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Can't create a macro with 2.4.0~devel
Le 28/02/2024 à 11:51, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : Le 27/02/2024 à 07:51, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Indeed, insetAllowed forbids it for some reason. However the insertion is not guarded correctly. I do not want to fix this now, I have first to fix the crash The copy works and the crash is gone. Thanks! Hmm, what copy works? JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Can't create a macro with 2.4.0~devel
Le 27/02/2024 à 07:51, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Indeed, insetAllowed forbids it for some reason. However the insertion is not guarded correctly. I do not want to fix this now, I have first to fix the crash The copy works and the crash is gone. Thanks! -- Jean-Pierre -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Mark utf8x as "deprecated" ?
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 20:11 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > That is indeed good to know. I don't think we should remove the > support, > just signal to the user that it's not recommended anymore. > > Scott Honestly, I suspect, it probably means that since it works the authors do not care. :-) So probably the first step is to signal that to developers/writers and to see if that it is still needed or a remnant from the past... I am becoming nostalgic with time. :-D Best regards, -- José Abílio -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
