Re: #11203: LyX 2.3, Listings/minted: Document-wide settings yield invalid LaTeX code involving \setminted

[Virgil L]

Thank you! It's great to hear that the bug may already have been eliminated. 
However, if I read it correctly, the description of the other bug does NOT 
emphasize or mention \setminted which in my case is the real culprit, because 
it yields errors that BREAK the execution of the LaTeX code.
The way the other bug is described it sounds as if the document would compile 
but the wrong syntax highlighter would be used...that is NOT what happens in my 
case...the compilation of the produced LaTeX code does NOT conclude 
successfully.
By the way,  you may want to contact the minted maintainer to ensure that in 
the next release all minted instructions and options are invoked as intended. 
He has been very responsive and probably would be even more so, if contacted by 
developers.
BR
Virgil 

On Sunday, July 22, 2018 10:36 PM, LyX Ticket Tracker  wrote:
 

 #11203: LyX 2.3, Listings/minted: Document-wide settings yield invalid LaTeX 
code
involving \setminted
+
 Reporter:  Virgilinux  |      Owner:  rikiheck
    Type:  defect      |      Status:  fixedinmaster
 Priority:  normal      |  Milestone:
Component:  insets      |    Version:  2.3.0
 Severity:  normal      |  Resolution:
 Keywords:              |
+
Changes (by forenr):

 * status:  new => fixedinmaster


Comment:

 Should be fixed in master at [16ca5290/lyxgit].

-- 
Ticket URL: 
The LyX Project 
LyX -- The Document Processor


   

|  | Virus-free. www.avast.com  |

Re: Theorem numbering by type and IEEETran class

[Virgil L]

--- On Mon, 7/23/12, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
 From: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org
 Subject: Re: Theorem numbering by type and IEEETran class
 To: Virgil virgili...@yahoo.com
 Cc: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
 Date: Monday, July 23, 2012, 4:02 PM
 On 07/23/2012 07:32 AM, Virgil
 wrote:

  Thanks, Richard, for your detailed reply...I have implemented it and so far 
  it
    seems to be working...However, step (ii) above
  (renaming IEEEtran.layout) seems to cause problems, because, apparently LyX
  assumes there would a matching class called IEEEtran-bytype.cls...I 
  reverted the
  name back to IEEEtran.layout and that seems to have fixed it... (I suppose I
  could have also made a copy of the class named IEEEtran-bytype.cls and it 
  might
  have worked).


 Sorry, I messed up slightly at (iii). The line should say:
     # \DeclareLaTeXClass[IEEEtran]{article (IEEEtran, by type)}
 LyX assumes, as you found, that the class name is the same
 as the layout file name, unless you tell it otherwise.
 
 If you make that change rename the file back to
 IEEEtran-bytype.layout, you should be able to see both of
 the layouts after you reconfigure.

Hi, Richard,
I did as you suggest above, and it seems to be working well now...
I have also experimented switching between both document types (the original 
IEEEtran and the modified one), and also between the various Theorem modules 
each provides, and all seems to work well...this solution is certainly 
livable...
Many thanks again!

Virgil

Re: Theorem numbering by type and IEEETran class

[Virgil L]

--- On Mon, 7/23/12, Richard Heck  wrote:
> From: Richard Heck 
> Subject: Re: Theorem numbering by type and IEEETran class
> To: "Virgil" 
> Cc: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
> Date: Monday, July 23, 2012, 4:02 PM
> On 07/23/2012 07:32 AM, Virgil
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Richard, for your detailed reply...I have implemented it and so far 
> > it
> >   seems to be working...However, step (ii) above
> > (renaming IEEEtran.layout) seems to cause problems, because, apparently LyX
> > assumes there would a matching class called IEEEtran-bytype.cls...I 
> > reverted the
> > name back to IEEEtran.layout and that seems to have fixed it... (I suppose I
> > could have also made a copy of the class named IEEEtran-bytype.cls and it 
> > might
> > have worked).
>
>
> Sorry, I messed up slightly at (iii). The line should say:
>     # \DeclareLaTeXClass[IEEEtran]{article (IEEEtran, by type)}
> LyX assumes, as you found, that the class name is the same
> as the layout file name, unless you tell it otherwise.
> 
> If you make that change rename the file back to
> IEEEtran-bytype.layout, you should be able to see both of
> the layouts after you reconfigure.

Hi, Richard,
I did as you suggest above, and it seems to be working well now...
I have also experimented switching between both document types (the original 
IEEEtran and the modified one), and also between the various Theorem modules 
each provides, and all seems to work well...this solution is certainly 
livable...
Many thanks again!

Virgil