Re: Comment + insetnote

2003-03-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
 Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Dekel On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:55:25AM +, John Levon wrote:
  why do we have both again ?

Dekel Currently insetnote is not versatile enough:

Dekel - The text does not appear in the .tex file, so if you give
Dekel someone the .tex file, he doesn't see the notes. - You cannot
Dekel redefine it, so the text will appear in the output.

Of course, both would be rather easy to implement...

JMarc


Re: Comment + insetnote

2003-03-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Dekel> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:55:25AM +, John Levon wrote:
>>  why do we have both again ?

Dekel> Currently insetnote is not versatile enough:

Dekel> - The text does not appear in the .tex file, so if you give
Dekel> someone the .tex file, he doesn't see the notes. - You cannot
Dekel> redefine it, so the text will appear in the output.

Of course, both would be rather easy to implement...

JMarc


Re: Comment + insetnote

2003-03-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:55:25AM +, John Levon wrote:
 
 why do we have both again ?

Currently insetnote is not versatile enough:

- The text does not appear in the .tex file, so if you give someone the .tex
file, he doesn't see the notes.
- You cannot redefine it, so the text will appear in the output.


Re: Comment + insetnote

2003-03-15 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 09:25:41PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:

 Currently insetnote is not versatile enough:
 
 - The text does not appear in the .tex file, so if you give someone the .tex
 file, he doesn't see the notes.
 - You cannot redefine it, so the text will appear in the output.

Yes, I see now..

thanks
john


Re: Comment + insetnote

2003-03-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:55:25AM +, John Levon wrote:
> 
> why do we have both again ?

Currently insetnote is not versatile enough:

- The text does not appear in the .tex file, so if you give someone the .tex
file, he doesn't see the notes.
- You cannot redefine it, so the text will appear in the output.


Re: Comment + insetnote

2003-03-15 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 09:25:41PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:

> Currently insetnote is not versatile enough:
> 
> - The text does not appear in the .tex file, so if you give someone the .tex
> file, he doesn't see the notes.
> - You cannot redefine it, so the text will appear in the output.

Yes, I see now..

thanks
john


Comment + insetnote

2003-03-13 Thread John Levon

why do we have both again ?

john


Comment + insetnote

2003-03-13 Thread John Levon

why do we have both again ?

john