Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
for a master is open email and did not find it. Did I make a
mistake?

Scott

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 

Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :

I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
for a master is open email and did not find it. Did I make a
mistake?


I did that too, and began to wonder what is supposed to happen wrt 
2.2-staging. Who is going to cherry-pick what is there? When? In the 
meantime, shall we commit to 2.2-staging or master?


I see that master is version 2.2.0dev, so it is presumably open.

JMarc

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Richard Heck 

On 04/21/2014 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :

I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
for a master is open email and did not find it. Did I make a
mistake?


I did that too, and began to wonder what is supposed to happen wrt 
2.2-staging. Who is going to cherry-pick what is there? When? In the 
meantime, shall we commit to 2.2-staging or master?


I see that master is version 2.2.0dev, so it is presumably open.


I took it still to be closed, until 2.2-staging had been merged. I have 
a merged branch on my machine,

with the two small conflicts fixed. Shall I push it?

Richard

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Kornel Benko 
Am Montag, 21. April 2014 um 11:01:39, schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org
 On 04/21/2014 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
  Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
  I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
  for a master is open email and did not find it. Did I make a
  mistake?
 
  I did that too, and began to wonder what is supposed to happen wrt 
  2.2-staging. Who is going to cherry-pick what is there? When? In the 
  meantime, shall we commit to 2.2-staging or master?
 
  I see that master is version 2.2.0dev, so it is presumably open.
 
 I took it still to be closed, until 2.2-staging had been merged. I have 
 a merged branch on my machine,
 with the two small conflicts fixed. Shall I push it?

+1

I mistakenly committed to master too ...

 Richard

Kornel

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Richard Heck 

On 04/21/2014 11:05 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:


Am Montag, 21. April 2014 um 11:01:39, schrieb Richard Heck 
rgh...@lyx.org


 On 04/21/2014 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

  Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :

  I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked

  for a master is open email and did not find it. Did I make a

  mistake?

 

  I did that too, and began to wonder what is supposed to happen wrt

  2.2-staging. Who is going to cherry-pick what is there? When? In the

  meantime, shall we commit to 2.2-staging or master?

 

  I see that master is version 2.2.0dev, so it is presumably open.



 I took it still to be closed, until 2.2-staging had been merged. I have

 a merged branch on my machine,

 with the two small conflicts fixed. Shall I push it?

+1

I mistakenly committed to master too ...



Let me wait a bit and see if we hear from Vincent.

Richard

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 

Richard Heck schreef op 21-4-2014 17:36:

Let me wait a bit and see if we hear from Vincent.

Richard



I was working on it until something slightly more important came into my 
life.


Please proceed with what you think is right for the moment.

Vincent

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Richard Heck 

On 04/21/2014 05:37 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:

Richard Heck schreef op 21-4-2014 17:36:

Let me wait a bit and see if we hear from Vincent.

Richard



I was working on it until something slightly more important came into 
my life.


Please proceed with what you think is right for the moment.


Fully understood.

Richard

Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
for a "master is open" email and did not find it. Did I make a
mistake?

Scott

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 

Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :

I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
for a "master is open" email and did not find it. Did I make a
mistake?


I did that too, and began to wonder what is supposed to happen wrt 
2.2-staging. Who is going to cherry-pick what is there? When? In the 
meantime, shall we commit to 2.2-staging or master?


I see that master is version 2.2.0dev, so it is presumably open.

JMarc

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Richard Heck 

On 04/21/2014 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :

I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
for a "master is open" email and did not find it. Did I make a
mistake?


I did that too, and began to wonder what is supposed to happen wrt 
2.2-staging. Who is going to cherry-pick what is there? When? In the 
meantime, shall we commit to 2.2-staging or master?


I see that master is version 2.2.0dev, so it is presumably open.


I took it still to be closed, until 2.2-staging had been merged. I have 
a merged branch on my machine,

with the two small conflicts fixed. Shall I push it?

Richard

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Kornel Benko 
Am Montag, 21. April 2014 um 11:01:39, schrieb Richard Heck 
> On 04/21/2014 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >> I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
> >> for a "master is open" email and did not find it. Did I make a
> >> mistake?
> >
> > I did that too, and began to wonder what is supposed to happen wrt 
> > 2.2-staging. Who is going to cherry-pick what is there? When? In the 
> > meantime, shall we commit to 2.2-staging or master?
> >
> > I see that master is version 2.2.0dev, so it is presumably open.
> 
> I took it still to be closed, until 2.2-staging had been merged. I have 
> a merged branch on my machine,
> with the two small conflicts fixed. Shall I push it?

+1

I mistakenly committed to master too ...

> Richard

Kornel

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Richard Heck 

On 04/21/2014 11:05 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:


Am Montag, 21. April 2014 um 11:01:39, schrieb Richard Heck 



> On 04/21/2014 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

> > Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :

> >> I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked

> >> for a "master is open" email and did not find it. Did I make a

> >> mistake?

> >

> > I did that too, and began to wonder what is supposed to happen wrt

> > 2.2-staging. Who is going to cherry-pick what is there? When? In the

> > meantime, shall we commit to 2.2-staging or master?

> >

> > I see that master is version 2.2.0dev, so it is presumably open.

>

> I took it still to be closed, until 2.2-staging had been merged. I have

> a merged branch on my machine,

> with the two small conflicts fixed. Shall I push it?

+1

I mistakenly committed to master too ...



Let me wait a bit and see if we hear from Vincent.

Richard

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn 

Richard Heck schreef op 21-4-2014 17:36:

Let me wait a bit and see if we hear from Vincent.

Richard



I was working on it until something slightly more important came into my 
life.


Please proceed with what you think is right for the moment.

Vincent

Re: Is master open?

2014-04-21 Thread Richard Heck 

On 04/21/2014 05:37 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:

Richard Heck schreef op 21-4-2014 17:36:

Let me wait a bit and see if we hear from Vincent.

Richard



I was working on it until something slightly more important came into 
my life.


Please proceed with what you think is right for the moment.


Fully understood.

Richard