RE: Make master-buffer-update (and -view) compile current document when there is no master
> This makes sense IMHO. Please file an enhancement request at > http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome so that it does not get > forgotten. Done (#9842). Thank you. Best,JoonFrom: joon...@outlook.com To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org Subject: Make master-buffer-update (and -view) compile current document when there is no master Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:32:48 -0800 Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible to make master-buffer-update (and -view) compile the current document when there is no master defined. It will reduce the psychological overhead involved with remembering to press two different shortcuts to achieve the same goal (compile the whole document) depending on document structures. For example, I have two document projects going on, one with a master (a separate lyx file for each sections), the other without a master (all sections in one lyx file). Since I developed the habit of pressing the shortcut for master-buffer-update for the first project, I often find myself mistakenly pressing the same shortcut while I'm working on the second project, which does not do anything. Since this command is disabled when there is no master, I don't think it will add any confusion. Thank you,Joon
Re: Make master-buffer-update (and -view) compile current document when there is no master
Joon Ro wrote: > Hi, > I was wondering if it would be possible to make master-buffer-update (and > -view) compile the current document when there is no master defined. It > will reduce the psychological overhead involved with remembering to press > two different shortcuts to achieve the same goal (compile the whole > document) depending on document structures. For example, I have two > document projects going on, one with a master (a separate lyx file for > each sections), the other without a master (all sections in one lyx file). > Since I developed the habit of pressing the shortcut for > master-buffer-update for the first project, I often find myself mistakenly > pressing the same shortcut while I'm working on the second project, which > does not do anything. Since this command is disabled when there is no > master, I don't think it will add any confusion. Thank you,Joon This makes sense IMHO. Please file an enhancement request at http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome so that it does not get forgotten. Georg
