Re: Release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4?
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 04:47:29PM +, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 07:57:23AM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 27.01.2018, 14:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:50:07AM +, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:51:09AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > > > > > > > Very good. Can the translator be sure that no string will be > > > > > changed > > > > > afterwards (except for a bugfixes of course)? > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > Note that fdc98c3 requires a po change. > > > > I'd suggest that you remerge strings, Scott. > > Thanks for the reminder, I will do so soon. I will remerge strings right before tagging, unless you suggest I do it as soon as possible for some reason. I'm glad you reminded me though, because I forgot in the past. Since that time, I have ensured that it is part of my release process. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4?
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 07:57:23AM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Samstag, den 27.01.2018, 14:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:50:07AM +, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:51:09AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > > > > > Very good. Can the translator be sure that no string will be > > > > changed > > > > afterwards (except for a bugfixes of course)? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > Note that fdc98c3 requires a po change. > > I'd suggest that you remerge strings, Scott. Thanks for the reminder, I will do so soon. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4?
Am Samstag, den 27.01.2018, 14:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:50:07AM +, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:51:09AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > > > Very good. Can the translator be sure that no string will be > > > changed > > > afterwards (except for a bugfixes of course)? > > > > Yes. > > Note that fdc98c3 requires a po change. I'd suggest that you remerge strings, Scott. Jürgen > > Scott signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4?
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:50:07AM +, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:51:09AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > Very good. Can the translator be sure that no string will be changed > > afterwards (except for a bugfixes of course)? > > Yes. Note that fdc98c3 requires a po change. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4?
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 05:58:28AM +, Stephan Witt wrote: > I got it and can build the Qt-frameworks and the LyX-bundle with it. > My first impression is good. I cannot see a problem with it. Great! Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4?
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:51:09AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Very good. Can the translator be sure that no string will be changed > afterwards (except for a bugfixes of course)? Yes. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4?
Am 23.01.2018 um 19:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > Qt 5.9.4 was released today: > > http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/01/23/qt-5-9-4-released/ > > This is good for a few reasons. First, it seems that Qt is sticking to > their planned schedule more than they have in the past. Qt 5.9.4 was > scheduled for January, and they delivered. This is good to know for our > planning in the future. > > There are no new features (which I am happy about) and > "Compared to Qt 5.9.3, the new Qt 5.9.4 contains nearly 200 bug fixes" > > I think we should release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4. Stephan and Uwe, what > are your thoughts? Will you have time to build now so you can give it a > test before we do the release? I got it and can build the Qt-frameworks and the LyX-bundle with it. My first impression is good. I cannot see a problem with it. Stephan
Re: Release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4?
Am 23.01.2018 um 19:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Qt 5.9.4 was released today: http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/01/23/qt-5-9-4-released/ Many thanks. I upgraded and can compile LyX with it. I also built an installer using current 2.3.x branch and all tests were passed. However, https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10848 remains. It might be a bug in LyX and not in Qt. Uwe, since we have caught problems in the past this way, can I send you a tar ball from 2.3.0rc2 so that you can see if there is any problem when generating a binary from it? Yes please. I'm still hoping to go forward with releasing rc2 this weekend. Very good. Can the translator be sure that no string will be changed afterwards (except for a bugfixes of course)? thanks and regards Uwe
Release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4?
Qt 5.9.4 was released today: http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/01/23/qt-5-9-4-released/ This is good for a few reasons. First, it seems that Qt is sticking to their planned schedule more than they have in the past. Qt 5.9.4 was scheduled for January, and they delivered. This is good to know for our planning in the future. There are no new features (which I am happy about) and "Compared to Qt 5.9.3, the new Qt 5.9.4 contains nearly 200 bug fixes" I think we should release 2.3.0rc2 with Qt 5.9.4. Stephan and Uwe, what are your thoughts? Will you have time to build now so you can give it a test before we do the release? Uwe, since we have caught problems in the past this way, can I send you a tar ball from 2.3.0rc2 so that you can see if there is any problem when generating a binary from it? I'm still hoping to go forward with releasing rc2 this weekend. Scott p.s. I am behind on emails and trac tickets. I will catch up tomorrow. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
