Re: [rework docs] include mathed documentation
John Weiss wrote: Better to move the more esoteric features into the Extended doc. OK, I'll do so.
Re: [rework docs] include mathed documentation
John Weiss wrote: Better to move the more esoteric features into the Extended doc. OK, I'll do so.
Re: [rework docs] include mathed documentation
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:31:37AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, [UTF-8] Uwe Sthr wrote: I covers now nearly all math constructs. I want to replace the mathed section in the userguide by this documentation. In my opinion the tutorial has a very good introduction to mathed: It explains navigating in formulas, the math-panel and the most common used constructs (fractions etc.). So that we could go deeper in the userguide. Mathed supports so many constructs that aren't explained in the docs at the moment. Are there any objections against this plan? I doubt that... the only concern I can think of is that it might be too much/advanced? That's what I was about to say. We (a Maths professor and myself) intentionally *did* *not* cover all possible mathed features in the User's Guide precisely because of scope. Better to move the more esoteric features into the Extended doc. -- John Weiss
Re: [rework docs] include mathed documentation
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:31:37AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, [UTF-8] Uwe StïÃïÂïhr wrote: > > > I covers now nearly all math constructs. I want to replace the mathed > > section in the userguide by this documentation. > > In my opinion the tutorial has a very good introduction to mathed: It > > explains navigating in formulas, the math-panel and the most common used > > constructs (fractions etc.). So that we could go deeper in the > > userguide. Mathed supports so many constructs that aren't explained in > > the docs at the moment. > > > > Are there any objections against this plan? > > I doubt that... the only concern I can think of is that it might be too > much/advanced? That's what I was about to say. We (a Maths professor and myself) intentionally *did* *not* cover all possible mathed features in the User's Guide precisely because of scope. Better to move the more esoteric features into the Extended doc. -- John Weiss
Re: [rework docs] include mathed documentation
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, [UTF-8] Uwe Stöhr wrote: I covers now nearly all math constructs. I want to replace the mathed section in the userguide by this documentation. In my opinion the tutorial has a very good introduction to mathed: It explains navigating in formulas, the math-panel and the most common used constructs (fractions etc.). So that we could go deeper in the userguide. Mathed supports so many constructs that aren't explained in the docs at the moment. Are there any objections against this plan? I doubt that... the only concern I can think of is that it might be too much/advanced? /Christian PS. Give a shout if you'd like help proofreading the english translation. I was going to offer help translating, but realized how stupid that'd be... -- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
Re: [rework docs] include mathed documentation
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, [UTF-8] Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I covers now nearly all math constructs. I want to replace the mathed > section in the userguide by this documentation. > In my opinion the tutorial has a very good introduction to mathed: It > explains navigating in formulas, the math-panel and the most common used > constructs (fractions etc.). So that we could go deeper in the > userguide. Mathed supports so many constructs that aren't explained in > the docs at the moment. > > Are there any objections against this plan? I doubt that... the only concern I can think of is that it might be too much/advanced? /Christian PS. Give a shout if you'd like help proofreading the english translation. I was going to offer help translating, but realized how stupid that'd be... -- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
[rework docs] include mathed documentation
Hello LyXers, I forgot to say that I want to include my mathed documentation. For those who are able to read german, it is available at http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/LyX/LyXMathebefehle (In german because I wrote it once for me and fellow students.) I covers now nearly all math constructs. I want to replace the mathed section in the userguide by this documentation. In my opinion the tutorial has a very good introduction to mathed: It explains navigating in formulas, the math-panel and the most common used constructs (fractions etc.). So that we could go deeper in the userguide. Mathed supports so many constructs that aren't explained in the docs at the moment. Are there any objections against this plan? regards Uwe
[rework docs] include mathed documentation
Hello LyXers, I forgot to say that I want to include my mathed documentation. For those who are able to read german, it is available at http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/LyX/LyXMathebefehle (In german because I wrote it once for me and fellow students.) I covers now nearly all math constructs. I want to replace the mathed section in the userguide by this documentation. In my opinion the tutorial has a very good introduction to mathed: It explains navigating in formulas, the math-panel and the most common used constructs (fractions etc.). So that we could go deeper in the userguide. Mathed supports so many constructs that aren't explained in the docs at the moment. Are there any objections against this plan? regards Uwe
